Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1215618
| From | "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] S390: add pci_iomap_wc() and pci_iomap_wc_range() |
| Date | 2015-08-29 02:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q2C2d-2c4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q1Ssp-3Ko-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <q2l1o-37W-83@gated-at.bofh.it> <q2ncR-6b8-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:22:27AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 08/27/2015 11:06 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > >* Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> wrote: > > > >>From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com> > >> > >>S390 requires its own implementation of pcio_iomap*() calls > >>is because it has its "BAR spaces are not disjunctive on s390 > >>so we need the bar parameter of pci_iomap to find the corresponding > >>device and create the mapping cookie" -- in summary, it has its own > >>lookup/lock solution. > >> > >>It does not include asm-generic/pci_iomap.h > >> > >>Since it currenty maps ioremap_wc() to ioremap_nocache() and that's > >>the architecture default we can easily just map the wc calls to > >>the default calls as well. > >> > >>Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> > >>Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> > >>Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> > >>Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org > >>Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >>Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> > >>Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> > >>Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> > >>Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > >>Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> > >>Reported-by: 0 day bot > >>Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@suse.com> > >>--- > >> > >>This broke through some series that went into Ingo's tip tree which > >>I added. As such I *think* this should go through Ingo's tip tree. > >>Let me know. Up to you guys. > > > >I fixed the changelog to explain all this. > > > >Also, is there any other architecture that got broken by: > > > > 1b3d4200c1e0 PCI: Add pci_iomap_wc() variants > > > > Should be the only one. There are only two implementations of pci_iomap(), > one in s390 code and the generic implementation. Indeed, sadly there is no semantics well defined to establish this requirement so the best we can do is infer: mcgrof@ergon ~/linux-next (git::20150805-pend-all)$ git grep pci_iomap_range arch/ arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:#define pci_iomap_wc_range pci_iomap_range arch/s390/pci/pci.c:void __iomem *pci_iomap_range(struct pci_dev *pdev, arch/s390/pci/pci.c:EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_iomap_range); arch/s390/pci/pci.c: return pci_iomap_range(dev, bar, 0, maxlen); To this end a Kconfig option to implicate this might be more well suited for future lookups and make other architectures which are incompatible with generic pci_iomap clearer. Will post an RFC. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] S390: add pci_iomap_wc() and pci_iomap_wc_range() "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> - 2015-08-27 01:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] S390: add pci_iomap_wc() and pci_iomap_wc_range() Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-08-28 08:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] S390: add pci_iomap_wc() and pci_iomap_wc_range() Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-08-28 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] S390: add pci_iomap_wc() and pci_iomap_wc_range() "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com> - 2015-08-29 02:20 +0200
[tip:x86/mm] s390/io: Add pci_iomap_wc() and pci_iomap_wc_range() "tip-bot for Luis R. Rodriguez" <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2015-08-28 08:50 +0200
csiph-web