Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1214242
| From | Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition |
| Date | 2015-08-27 01:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q1Ssp-3Ko-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q1LKh-2zS-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <q1LTZ-2LN-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <q1MwH-3Km-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <q1QgW-GC-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <q1S94-3nY-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 01:16 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 10:16 -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> wrote: > > > > ACPI 6.0 NFIT Memory Device State Flags in Table 5-129 defines > > > > bit 3 as follows. > > > > > > > > Bit [3] set to 1 to indicate that the Memory Device is observed > > > > to be not armed prior to OSPM hand off. A Memory Device is > > > > considered armed if it is able to accept persistent writes. > > > > > > > > This bit is currently defined as ACPI_NFIT_MEM_ARMED, which can be > > > > confusing as if the Memory Device is armed when this bit is set. > > > > > > > > Change the name to ACPI_NFIT_MEM_NOT_ARMED per the spec. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> > > > > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> > > > > Cc: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> > > > > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/acpi/nfit.c | 6 +++--- > > > > drivers/acpi/nfit.h | 2 +- > > > > include/acpi/actbl1.h | 2 +- > > > > > > This file "include/acpi/actbl1.h" is owned by the ACPICA project so > > > any changes need to come through them. But that said, I'm not sure we > > > need friendly names at this level. > > > > I think the name is misleading, but I agree with the process and this > > patch2 can be dropped. It'd be nice if the ACPICA project can pick it > > up later when they have a chance, though. > > A good way to cause that to happen would be to send a patch to the > ACPICA development list + maintainers as per MAINTAINERS. Oh, I see. I did run get_maintainer.pl for this patch, but devel@acpica.org did not come out in output... So, I did not realize this email list. Thanks for the suggestion! -Toshi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/2]: acpi, nfit: Clarify memory device state flags Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> - 2015-08-26 18:30 +0200
[PATCH 1/2]: nfit: Clarify memory device state flags strings Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> - 2015-08-26 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2]: nfit: Clarify memory device state flags strings Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-27 05:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2]: nfit: Clarify memory device state flags strings Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> - 2015-08-27 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2]: nfit: Clarify memory device state flags strings Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-08-27 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2]: nfit: Clarify memory device state flags strings Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> - 2015-08-27 21:10 +0200
[PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> - 2015-08-26 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-08-26 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hp.com> - 2015-08-26 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> - 2015-08-26 23:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-08-26 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> - 2015-08-26 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-08-27 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hp.com> - 2015-08-27 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hp.com> - 2015-08-27 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-08-27 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hp.com> - 2015-08-27 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hp.com> - 2015-08-27 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-08-27 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2015-08-27 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2015-08-27 01:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> - 2015-08-27 01:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> - 2015-08-27 01:40 +0200
RE: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com> - 2015-08-27 04:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2]: acpica/nfit: Rename not-armed bit definition Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> - 2015-08-27 16:40 +0200
csiph-web