Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1161904
| From | Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] do not dereference NULL pools in pools' destroy() functions |
| Date | 2015-06-10 04:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pzDCO-9p-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pzqvT-682-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <pzzfQ-246-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <pzCQp-7qt-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <pzDjs-7Zy-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Why do this at all? > > For the third time: because there are approx 200 callsites which are > already doing it. Did some grepping and I did see some call sites that do this but the majority has to do other processing as well. 200 call sites? Do we have that many uses of caches? Typical prod system have ~190 caches active and the merging brings that down to half of that. > More than half of the kmem_cache_destroy() callsites are declining that > value by open-coding the NULL test. That's reality and we should recognize > it. Well that may just indicate that we need to have a look at those callsites and the reason there to use a special cache at all. If the cache is just something that kmalloc can provide then why create a special cache. On the other hand if something special needs to be accomplished then it would make sense to have special processing on kmem_cache_destroy. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] do not dereference NULL pools in pools' destroy() functions Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2015-06-10 03:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] do not dereference NULL pools in pools' destroy() functions Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-06-10 03:50 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] do not dereference NULL pools in pools' destroy() functions Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2015-06-10 04:10 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] do not dereference NULL pools in pools' destroy() functions Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-06-10 04:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] do not dereference NULL pools in pools' destroy() functions Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> - 2015-06-10 04:10 +0200
csiph-web