Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1207981
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi: bitbang: Replace spinlock by mutex when calling chipselect |
| Date | 2015-08-15 04:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pXzeF-3OQ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pU47n-6U1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 06:24:05PM +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote: > Anyway, the "safer" way to fix this would be to keep the > prepare/unprepare functions, busy variable, and just protect it with a > mutex instead of a spinlock... OK, that seems reasonable.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi: bitbang: Replace spinlock by mutex when calling chipselect Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> - 2015-08-05 12:30 +0200 Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi: bitbang: Replace spinlock by mutex when calling chipselect Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-08-15 04:20 +0200
csiph-web