Groups > linux.kernel > #1207219

Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values wrong in VM?

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!newsfeed.Update.UU.SE!news.Update.UU.SE!itgate.net!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values wrong in VM?
Date	Fri, 14 Aug 2015 01:00:02 +0200
Message-ID	<pX9DA-q0-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<pWWdk-6oF-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <pX2sq-74a-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pX3y9-92-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <pX4kx-1jL-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pX4Nz-1RR-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pX5JE-3dG-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <pX8oa-7bD-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <pX8xQ-7ln-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <pX9Dz-q0-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=aCFV8pf8g0OvHnCeaK3a7CRgss7tO8mxDEBC9CrMJWE=; b=qhyYvpzkjD49uDrri5Z/64CF/6gPUdQZdLKpmDMs4yJbaGiDNL4i1FhJiE3WzKOgOa mhk6s+An0lNQtwKef1ecILtJ/sG2Zf3eQEhU99+WfFDkkzaitB3Dc5+MTJjPSuqcb5AU hX6IzamFxBubUHGMnlzEnadyqIfmGoiEaIOezN+tb2g7VzGez8A4OXGhZcsGhSLm5Kqy NneWePiOiVRuydqEncCm0DMYvD6zbD5+2RWTg/sfOFE9SBo/2oisTX2SV5sX44FOpoNw SHJQiE30XZvojJWBa3XPnuWA8LkyrkwLL1BL0dAEUn16Yp2g39Nk8g9kCWekoZunoMEY iNCA==
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=aCFV8pf8g0OvHnCeaK3a7CRgss7tO8mxDEBC9CrMJWE=; b=E8BNEJXUit01doL1p4kmXhObKx1PrmCa5MFy54/LCcgZ4TYCXUGLd+ijMzJMoOPuqg YQYHUckL4fwWOYIhQKYy5JF39yz0a93H3WfmzKSQeLz0pZnHREgmp064JR7NsCmuQRgZ iPRb0foRvGTmdoXCdVx5+CyxvpZWwozJZIqF8=
MIME-Version	1.0
X-Received	by 10.107.8.216 with SMTP id h85mr32175554ioi.89.1439506487230; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Sender-Auth	0AIqSHpqv5iZUbIgjeJ7LvH4rF0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
List-ID	<linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	20
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Cc	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>
X-Original-Date	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:54:47 -0700
X-Original-Message-ID	<CA+55aFx6Ade9UwDQ2KgsQgVMog+B9VXNYqrb1vm+EvBbkazhuA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References	<CAHse=S8UeYVJqRBx-_wf=jeDERTJxzM=YRH5izBpQnrCHOxcDA@mail.gmail.com> <55CCB510.3060807@redhat.com> <CAHse=S8BrL6KeQL9gwa=9TH0nqWrNxq7rcHc--pAVriG+pxBmA@mail.gmail.com> <CALCETrXP0bH9nhh=aOPsiA-Bs0zNW_0xbXFhvbMPZeDV71VtZA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHse=S8OuPb4KFWBXJS6c9YdGPEH8MgpbWJ5qP79r04+4rK2Fw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGXu5j+gXShOAdK93KuVide93VYA_ObyjbK-zb7CwgOLc2JCnQ@mail.gmail.com> <55CD0DAC.9080809@redhat.com> <CALCETrWj6X+zCX47iHip0Qjp88p7f3p0uWvskL357XCyvPrXVA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+55aFyA9+16Jer2nKMOs6_uhRA-egvFDSR8fgNoD9AuPLE4GQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-Sender	linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Xref	csiph.com linux.kernel:1207219

Show key headers only | View raw

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Does the attached patch make sense and work?

Btw, I'm not all that happy with it anyway.

I still think Denys' patch also potentially changed what audit and
strace see for %rax in the pt_regs to -ENOSYS, which I'm not convinced
is a good change.

But maybe that three-liner patch fixes the immediate problem that
David sees. David?

                  Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Thread

[Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values wrong in VM? David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com> - 2015-08-13 10:40 +0200
  Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values  wrong in VM? Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> - 2015-08-13 17:20 +0200
    Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values  wrong in VM? David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com> - 2015-08-13 18:30 +0200
      Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values  wrong in VM? Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-08-13 19:20 +0200
        Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values  wrong in VM? David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com> - 2015-08-13 19:50 +0200
          Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values  wrong in VM? Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2015-08-13 20:50 +0200
            Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values  wrong in VM? Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> - 2015-08-13 23:40 +0200
              Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values  wrong in VM? Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-08-13 23:50 +0200
                Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values  wrong in VM? Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2015-08-14 01:00 +0200
                Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values  wrong in VM? Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-08-14 01:10 +0200
                Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values  wrong in VM? Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2015-08-14 01:20 +0200
                Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values  wrong in VM? Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-08-14 01:40 +0200
                Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values  wrong in VM? Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> - 2015-08-14 14:00 +0200
                Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values  wrong in VM? Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-08-14 16:30 +0200
                Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values  wrong in VM? David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com> - 2015-08-14 09:40 +0200
                Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values  wrong in VM? Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-08-14 01:00 +0200
                Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values  wrong in VM? Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-08-14 01:00 +0200
                Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values  wrong in VM? Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-08-14 01:30 +0200
                Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values  wrong in VM? Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-08-14 01:00 +0200
              Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values  wrong in VM? Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-08-14 00:30 +0200
                Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values  wrong in VM? Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> - 2015-08-14 13:30 +0200

csiph-web