Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1204357
| From | Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [Bugfix] x86, irq: Fix a regression caused by commit b5dc8e6c21e7 |
| Date | 2015-08-10 17:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pVWS5-1tl-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pVtZL-gN-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:15 AM, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Alex Deucher, Mark Rustad and Alexander Holler reported a regression
> with the latest v4.2-rc4 kernel, which breaks some SATA controllers.
> With multi-MSI capable SATA controllers, only the first port works,
> all other ports times out when executing SATA commands. This regression
> bisects to 52f518a3a7c2 ("x86/MSI: Use hierarchical irqdomains to manage
> MSI interrupts"), but it's not the root cause, it just triggers a bug
> caused by b5dc8e6c21e7 ("x86/irq: Use hierarchical irqdomain to manage
> CPU interrupt vectors").
>
> With this patch applied, the affected SATA controllers work as expected.
Yes, this fixes the SATA regression:
Tested-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
I'm not sure if it's related to this patch or not (I haven't bisected
it independently yet), but MSIs don't seem to work on GPUs. See the
line for amdgpu. This is just after loading the driver.
$ cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
0: 138 0 0 0 IR-IO-APIC
2-edge timer
1: 2 2 1 4 IR-IO-APIC
1-edge i8042
7: 1 0 0 0 IR-IO-APIC 7-edge
8: 0 0 1 0 IR-IO-APIC
8-edge rtc0
9: 0 0 0 0 IR-IO-APIC
9-fasteoi acpi
14: 0 0 0 0 IR-IO-APIC
14-edge pata_atiixp
15: 0 0 0 0 IR-IO-APIC
15-edge pata_atiixp
16: 302 303 301 314 IR-IO-APIC
16-fasteoi snd_hda_intel
17: 0 0 0 0 IR-IO-APIC
17-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb7, ehci_hcd:usb8
18: 0 0 0 0 IR-IO-APIC
18-fasteoi ohci_hcd:usb9, ohci_hcd:usb10, ohci_hcd:usb11
24: 0 0 0 1 PCI-MSI 4096-edge
AMD-Vi
26: 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI
34816-edge PCIe PME
27: 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI
344064-edge PCIe PME
28: 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI
348160-edge PCIe PME
29: 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI
350208-edge PCIe PME
30: 247 255 1381 4617 IR-PCI-MSI
278528-edge ahci0
31: 162 163 164 181 IR-PCI-MSI
278529-edge ahci1
34: 2 1 2 17 IR-PCI-MSI
262144-edge xhci_hcd
35: 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI
262145-edge xhci_hcd
36: 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI
262146-edge xhci_hcd
37: 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI
262147-edge xhci_hcd
38: 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI
262148-edge xhci_hcd
39: 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI
264192-edge xhci_hcd
40: 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI
264193-edge xhci_hcd
41: 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI
264194-edge xhci_hcd
42: 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI
264195-edge xhci_hcd
43: 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI
264196-edge xhci_hcd
44: 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI
2097152-edge xhci_hcd
45: 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI
2097153-edge xhci_hcd
46: 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI
2097154-edge xhci_hcd
47: 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI
2097155-edge xhci_hcd
48: 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI
2097156-edge xhci_hcd
50: 40 41 41 40 IR-PCI-MSI
526336-edge snd_hda_intel
51: 14 15 21 1105 IR-PCI-MSI
2621440-edge em1
52: 16579895 16579562 16580988 16583443 IR-PCI-MSI
524288-edge amdgpu
NMI: 4 3 4 3 Non-maskable interrupts
LOC: 15020 10425 8933 8584 Local timer interrupts
SPU: 0 0 0 0 Spurious interrupts
PMI: 4 3 4 3 Performance
monitoring interrupts
IWI: 1 1 1 1 IRQ work interrupts
RTR: 0 0 0 0 APIC ICR read retries
RES: 7203 5501 10621 5077 Rescheduling interrupts
CAL: 498 559 614 591 Function call interrupts
TLB: 58 149 104 95 TLB shootdowns
TRM: 0 0 0 0 Thermal event interrupts
THR: 0 0 0 0 Threshold APIC interrupts
DFR: 0 0 0 0 Deferred Error
APIC interrupts
MCE: 0 0 0 0 Machine check exceptions
MCP: 1 1 1 1 Machine check polls
HYP: 0 0 0 0 Hypervisor
callback interrupts
ERR: 1
MIS: 0
PIN: 0 0 0 0 Posted-interrupt
notification event
PIW: 0 0 0 0 Posted-interrupt
wakeup event
This worked fine on 4.1. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Alex
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
> Reported-by: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Mark Rustad <mrustad@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
> ---
> Hi Alex, Mark and Alexandler,
> Sorry for the long delay to root cause this regression, it's
> really annoying. Could you please help test this patch against the
> latest v4.2-rcx?
> Thanks!
> Gerry
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> index f813261d9740..2683f36e4e0a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static int x86_vector_alloc_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> irq_data->chip = &lapic_controller;
> irq_data->chip_data = data;
> irq_data->hwirq = virq + i;
> - err = assign_irq_vector_policy(virq, irq_data->node, data,
> + err = assign_irq_vector_policy(virq + i, irq_data->node, data,
> info);
> if (err)
> goto error;
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[Bugfix] x86, irq: Fix a regression caused by commit b5dc8e6c21e7 Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-09 10:20 +0200
Re: [Bugfix] x86, irq: Fix a regression caused by commit b5dc8e6c21e7 Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de> - 2015-08-09 12:20 +0200
Re: [Bugfix] x86, irq: Fix a regression caused by commit b5dc8e6c21e7 Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-09 16:20 +0200
Re: [Bugfix] x86, irq: Fix a regression caused by commit b5dc8e6c21e7 Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 17:10 +0200
Re: [Bugfix] x86, irq: Fix a regression caused by commit b5dc8e6c21e7 Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-11 03:10 +0200
Re: [Bugfix] x86, irq: Fix a regression caused by commit b5dc8e6c21e7 Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 21:50 +0200
Re: [Bugfix] x86, irq: Fix a regression caused by commit b5dc8e6c21e7 Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 22:20 +0200
Re: [Bugfix] x86, irq: Fix a regression caused by commit b5dc8e6c21e7 Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 00:20 +0200
Re: [Bugfix] x86, irq: Fix a regression caused by commit b5dc8e6c21e7 "Rustad, Mark D" <mark.d.rustad@intel.com> - 2015-08-10 18:50 +0200
Re: [Bugfix] x86, irq: Fix a regression caused by commit b5dc8e6c21e7 Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 23:10 +0200
Re: [Bugfix] x86, irq: Fix a regression caused by commit b5dc8e6c21e7 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-08-18 15:00 +0200
Re: [Bugfix] x86, irq: Fix a regression caused by commit b5dc8e6c21e7 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-08-17 23:20 +0200
[Bugfix] x86, irq: Fix an error in building CPU vector to IRQ number mapping for MSI Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-18 17:20 +0200
[tip:x86/urgent] x86/irq: Build correct vector mapping for multiple MSI interrupts tip-bot for Jiang Liu <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2015-08-18 18:30 +0200
csiph-web