Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1202972

Re: false positives with checkpatch

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, 2015-08-07 at 08:37 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-08-07 at 09:01 -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > When running checkpatch.pl against my latest patch set, I hit what I think are
> > two false positives.  Here are the related lines:
> > 
> > 	+static inline void flush_cache_pmem(void __pmem *addr, size_t size)
> > 	+{
> > 	+       if (arch_has_pmem_api())
> > 	+               arch_flush_cache_pmem(addr, size);
> > 	+}
> > 
> > The error was:
> > 
> > 	ERROR: need consistent spacing around '*' (ctx:WxV)
> > 	#88: FILE: include/linux/pmem.h:167:
> > 	+static inline void flush_cache_pmem(void __pmem *addr, size_t size)
> > 							 ^
> > The (void __annotation *variable) syntax is correct, I believe, and is used
> > consistently for both __iomem and __pmem annotations.
> 
> checkpatch doesn't know what a __pmem is.
> Neither did I until a second ago.
> 
> Are there any other sparse annotations that were
> added by this subsystem? (I don't notice any)

This was the only sparse annotation that we added.

> ---
>  scripts/checkpatch.pl | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index fd8e502..6362ec3 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ our $Sparse	= qr{
>  			__kernel|
>  			__force|
>  			__iomem|
> +			__pmem|
>  			__must_check|
>  			__init_refok|
>  			__kprobes|

Yep, this works for me.

Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: false positives with checkpatch Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2015-08-07 17:40 +0200
  Re: false positives with checkpatch Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com> - 2015-08-07 18:20 +0200
  Re: false positives with checkpatch Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-07 20:10 +0200

csiph-web