Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1199358

Re: [PATCH] x86: Clean up files of Intel Processor Trace

From Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] x86: Clean up files of Intel Processor Trace
Date 2015-08-04 03:10 +0200
Message-ID <pTyTT-3sQ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <pTj8u-5Oc-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <pTjUS-6Yc-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pTjUS-6Yc-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <pTkxB-7HQ-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 2015/08/03 18:44, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> On 3 August 2015 at 12:08, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:03:13PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>>> Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com> writes:
>>
>>> Even though TOPA_SHIFT happens to be the same as PAGE_SHIFT, it is a
>>> property of a separate hardware block, not mmu. PAGE_SHIFT is 12, but
>>> 12 is not always PAGE_SHIFT.
>>
>> PAGE_SHIFT is _always_ 12 on x86. Changing that will require changing
>> the page table format, a rather unlikely thing to go happen.
> 
> Of course. Yet that doesn't justify turning every 12 into PAGE_SHIFT
> is what I'm saying.
> 
> Oh, look, it's PAGE_SHIFT o'clock on x86, time for lunch. :)

I thought the base address of output region is page aligned. I took a
look at Intel SDM again, it just says the base address is 4K-aligned
physical address, does not mention page size. So, logically TOPA_SHIFT
and PAGE_SHIFT are different things and I'll remove this change in next
version.

Thanks,
Takao Indoh

> 
> Regards,
> --
> Alex
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] x86: Clean up files of Intel Processor Trace Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com> - 2015-08-03 10:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] x86: Clean up files of Intel Processor Trace Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-03 11:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] x86: Clean up files of Intel Processor Trace Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-08-03 11:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] x86: Clean up files of Intel Processor Trace Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2015-08-03 11:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] x86: Clean up files of Intel Processor Trace Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com> - 2015-08-04 03:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] x86: Clean up files of Intel Processor Trace Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-08-03 13:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] x86: Clean up files of Intel Processor Trace Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com> - 2015-08-04 03:20 +0200

csiph-web