Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1198931
| From | Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86, pat: Add comments to cachemode translation tables |
| Date | 2015-08-03 17:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pTpxg-6Ex-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <pPq8y-1pC-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPqBB-2df-43@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPqLg-2oy-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPqUV-2A7-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <pSYnn-Jb-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 12:07 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Toshi Kani wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 09:36 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 23.07.15 at 17:25, <toshi.kani@hp.com> wrote: > > > > Yes, I agree with you. But such risk is very low -- 1) the regular > > > > case > > > > (no fallback) is used most of the cases, 2) the code using WT knows > > > > what > > > > type of memory it is dealing with. For example, pmem may map NVDIMM > > > > > > > > with > > > > WT, and any sane BIOS sets MTRR to WB for NVDIMM. > > > > > > Do the words "sane" and "BIOS" really fit together in your opinion? > > > > :-) > > > > Anyway, I am not disagreeing with you... When UC is ready for both > > regular > > memory and IO memory, it should be changed to fall back to UC. > > What's the resolution of this discussion? Is that patch correct as is > or do we get an updated version? Yes, this patch is correct and we are in agreement. What Jan mentioned about falling back to UC, instead of UC-, is a separate item, and the code does not support it yet. Thanks, -Toshi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] x86, pat: Add comments to cachemode translation tables Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> - 2015-07-22 20:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86, pat: Add comments to cachemode translation tables "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> - 2015-07-23 08:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86, pat: Add comments to cachemode translation tables Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-08-02 12:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86, pat: Add comments to cachemode translation tables Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> - 2015-08-03 17:10 +0200
csiph-web