Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1191339
| From | Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Dealing with the NMI mess |
| Date | 2015-07-23 23:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pPwxk-2oa-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pPvhU-Eb-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPvrA-QP-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPvBg-12v-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPvUC-1EG-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPwnF-2cG-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 05:31:05PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:08:59 -0700 > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote: > > > > > > Issue A: to return with RF clear, we need to disarm the breakpoint. > > > If it's limited to the duration of the NMI, that's easy. If not, when > > > do we re-arm? New prepare_exit_to_usermode hook? Hmm, setting ti > > > flags during context switch may target the wrong task. > > > > We don't re-arm it. > > > > Let me get this straight. The idea is in the #DB handler to detect that > it was triggered in NMI context, and if so, simply disarm that > breakpoint permanently, right? > > Nothing should be adding hw breakpoints to NMI code anyway. Sounds > perfectly reasonable to me. Of course, how we tell we are in NMI > brings back all the races as we had in the nesting code. We can check > the per-cpu variable that is set with nmi_enter() and cleared at > nmi_exit() but what happens if the breakpoint is outside those calls. > We can check the stack pointer, but then we are back to userspace > fooling us. Maybe add the DF trick again? Can't the back link of the TSS tell us where we come from ? At least it should not be manipulable from user-space. Willy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Dealing with the NMI mess Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-07-23 23:40 +0200
Re: Dealing with the NMI mess Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-07-23 23:50 +0200
Re: Dealing with the NMI mess Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-07-24 00:00 +0200
Re: Dealing with the NMI mess Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-07-24 00:10 +0200
Re: Dealing with the NMI mess Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-07-24 10:20 +0200
Re: Dealing with the NMI mess Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2015-07-24 11:10 +0200
Re: Dealing with the NMI mess Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-07-24 14:00 +0200
Re: Dealing with the NMI mess Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-07-24 14:50 +0200
Re: Dealing with the NMI mess Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-07-24 15:10 +0200
Re: Dealing with the NMI mess Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2015-07-24 15:30 +0200
Re: Dealing with the NMI mess Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-07-24 15:40 +0200
Re: Dealing with the NMI mess Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-07-24 15:40 +0200
Re: Dealing with the NMI mess Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2015-07-30 17:50 +0200
Re: Dealing with the NMI mess Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-07-31 06:30 +0200
Re: Dealing with the NMI mess Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2015-07-30 18:00 +0200
Re: Dealing with the NMI mess Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-07-23 23:50 +0200
Re: Dealing with the NMI mess Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2015-07-24 00:00 +0200
Re: Dealing with the NMI mess Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2015-07-23 23:50 +0200
csiph-web