Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1190949
| From | Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm: rename and document alloc_pages_exact_node |
| Date | 2015-07-23 16:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pPpvQ-Ga-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pOGfo-1GD-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <pONqy-3CG-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <pP0xr-5zq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pPads-3Fl-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015, David Rientjes wrote: > Eek, yeah, that does look bad. I'm not even sure the > > if (nid < 0) > nid = numa_node_id(); > > is correct; I think this should be comparing to NUMA_NO_NODE rather than > all negative numbers, otherwise we silently ignore overflow and nobody > ever knows. Comparing to NUMA_NO_NODE would be better. Also use numa_mem_id() instead to support memoryless nodes better? > The only possible downside would be existing users of > alloc_pages_node() that are calling it with an offline node. Since it's a > VM_BUG_ON() that would catch that, I think it should be changed to a > VM_WARN_ON() and eventually fixed up because it's nonsensical. > VM_BUG_ON() here should be avoided. The offline node thing could be addresses by using numa_mem_id()? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] mm: rename and document alloc_pages_exact_node Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2015-07-23 16:20 +0200
csiph-web