Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1184416
| From | Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v7 3/9] nvmem: Add nvmem_device based consumer apis. |
| Date | 2015-07-15 10:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pMqeK-1Vx-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pKD6q-4eQ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <pKD6q-4eQ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <pMgyJ-4SO-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Thanks Stephen,
On 14/07/15 23:06, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/10, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>> +static int devm_nvmem_device_match(struct device *dev, void *res, void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct nvmem_device **nvmem = res;
>> +
>> + if (!nvmem || !*nvmem) {
>> + WARN_ON(!nvmem || !*nvmem);
>
> This could be
>
> if (WARN_ON(!nvmem || !*nvmem))
>
Yep, will fix it.
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> + return *nvmem == data;
>> +}
>> +
>> [..]
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * nvmem_device_write() - Write cell to a given nvmem device
>> + *
>> + * @nvmem: nvmem device to be written to.
>> + * @offset: offset in nvmem device.
>> + * @bytes: number of bytes to write.
>> + * @buf: buffer to be written.
>> + *
>> + * The return value will be an length of bytes written or non zero on failure.
>
> Should say negative value instead of non-zero? Length is
> non-zero already.
>
> General nitpick comment: Kernel-doc allows for a standard return
> syntax.
Ok, I will fix such instances.
>
> Return: length of bytes written or negative value on failure.
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
>> index f589d3b..74eed42 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
>> @@ -12,15 +12,9 @@
>> #ifndef _LINUX_NVMEM_PROVIDER_H
>> #define _LINUX_NVMEM_PROVIDER_H
>>
>> -struct nvmem_device;
>> +#include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h>
>>
>> -struct nvmem_cell_info {
>> - const char *name;
>> - int offset;
>> - int bytes;
>> - int bit_offset;
>> - int nbits;
>> -};
>
> Why does this move from provider to consumer? Can't we do put
> this struct in the right place from the beginning?
>
I will take care of it in next version.
--srini
>> +struct nvmem_device;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v7 3/9] nvmem: Add nvmem_device based consumer apis. Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> - 2015-07-10 11:50 +0200 Re: [PATCH v7 3/9] nvmem: Add nvmem_device based consumer apis. Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> - 2015-07-15 10:30 +0200
csiph-web