Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1180562
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] perf: Provide status of known PMUs |
| Date | 2015-07-09 11:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pKfQt-6pD-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pKeUr-5Qy-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 10:48:00AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: > Known PMUs may not be present for various reasons. > Provide a way for the user to know what the reason > is. Not a bad idea, but I do wonder where we should draw the line on what is 'known'. The patch as proposed will have bts/pt listed as 'known' for every arch out there. By that logic, x86 should list the ppc/sparc/mips/arm/etc.. PMUs as known and wrong_arch too, which might be a tad excessive. Can we limit it to PMUs for which we've (attempted to) load the drivers? That would obviously make a few of your status bits redundant, but then you've not explained why we're interested in it. > Supported > Driver error > Driver not loaded > Not supported by hardware > Wrong vendor > Unknown status There would work. > Driver not in kernel config > Not supported by kernel > Wrong architecture These will be hard, for if we don't load the driver we don't 'know' of them. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH] perf: Provide status of known PMUs Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> - 2015-07-09 10:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] perf: Provide status of known PMUs Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-07-09 10:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] perf: Provide status of known PMUs Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> - 2015-07-09 10:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] perf: Provide status of known PMUs Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-07-09 11:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] perf: Provide status of known PMUs Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-07-09 13:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] perf: Provide status of known PMUs Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-07-09 14:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] perf: Provide status of known PMUs Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-07-09 14:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] perf: Provide status of known PMUs Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-07-09 14:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] perf: Provide status of known PMUs Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-07-10 10:40 +0200
csiph-web