Re: [PATCH 4.1 54/56] fs/ufs: restore s_lock mutex

From	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 4.1 54/56] fs/ufs: restore s_lock mutex
Date	2015-07-10 19:40 +0200
Message-ID	<pKKrg-t8-37@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <pJS7x-8gJ-69@gated-at.bofh.it> <pK0or-50a-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <pK1ub-5CO-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <pK5eq-8fm-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <pKl9v-1jA-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:37:19PM +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 02:32:30PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 10:32:08AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 06:28:23PM +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Hello Greg,
> > > > 
> > > >                 Here's the complete list of linux-next/UFS patches needed
> > > > to stop regressions in write mode:
> > > > 
> > > > 13b987ea2758
> > > > fs/ufs: revert "ufs: fix deadlocks introduced by sb mutex merge"
> > > > 
> > > > cdd9eefdf905
> > > > fs/ufs: restore s_lock mutex
> > > > 
> > > > 12ecbb4b1d76
> > > > ufs: Fix warning from unlock_new_inode()
> > > > 
> > > > 514d748f69c9
> > > > ufs: Fix possible deadlock when looking up directories
> 
> I don't think the 2 commits above are appropriate for the 3.14 and
> 3.10 kernels as they fix commit e4502c63f56a ("ufs: deal with
> nfsd/iget races"), which isn't in these kernels

Ah, you are right, thanks, don't know how I missed that.  Now removed.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 4.1 54/56] fs/ufs: restore s_lock mutex Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-07-10 19:40 +0200

csiph-web