Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1169621

[PATCH - regression 4.1-rc8] can: fix loss of CAN frames in raw_rcv

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH - regression 4.1-rc8] can: fix loss of CAN frames in raw_rcv
Date Sun, 21 Jun 2015 19:00:02 +0200
Message-ID <pDQL8-2s4-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
X-Original-To netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, manfred.schlaegl@gmx.at, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mkl@pengutronix.de
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1434905821; l=3099; s=domk; d=hartkopp.net; h=Date:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=csQDf3GRz8H92JfXgflwAEDcXbQyXRzw0pjo4v+UZ20=; b=TJaccgH653XBA+UDS9B1hhd/c9MlYVyLhHJWyEcxVJRgaOQ2tonWFz8Ngmd9pp147Cu rQptAd98ePqZf6JyT1BT14iHFbQYpXmmIv9bvDXmzcuHTmfCIOLMphGeXRlnQp9SiAuUP J/YDtaRWl2svKjPnBdIw80AreRhBVDkwo9M=
X-Rzg-Auth :P2MHfkW8eP4Mre39l357AZT/I7AY/7nT2yrUzasv/3rS3K77wPZ4+wUwO9U0RVoWmVK/kg+X
X-Rzg-Class-ID mo00
X-Mailer git-send-email 2.1.4
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
List-ID <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 106
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Cc Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
X-Original-Date Sun, 21 Jun 2015 18:50:44 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <1434905444-11438-1-git-send-email-socketcan@hartkopp.net>
X-Original-Sender linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Xref aioe.org linux.kernel:1169621

Show key headers only | View raw


As reported by Manfred Schlaegl here

   http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=143482089824232&w=2

commit 514ac99c64b "can: fix multiple delivery of a single CAN frame for
overlapping CAN filters" requires the skb->tstamp to be set to check for
identical CAN skbs.

As net timestamping is influenced by several players (netstamp_needed and
netdev_tstamp_prequeue) Manfred missed a proper timestamp which leads to
CAN frame loss.

As skb timestamping became now mandatory for CAN related skbs this patch
makes sure that received CAN skbs always have a proper timestamp set.
Maybe there's a better solution in the future but this patch fixes the
CAN frame loss so far.

Reported-by: Manfred Schlaegl <manfred.schlaegl@gmx.at>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
---
 drivers/net/can/dev.c   | 5 +++++
 drivers/net/can/slcan.c | 1 +
 drivers/net/can/vcan.c  | 3 +++
 net/can/af_can.c        | 6 +++++-
 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/dev.c b/drivers/net/can/dev.c
index b0f6924..e9b1810 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/dev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/dev.c
@@ -440,6 +440,9 @@ unsigned int can_get_echo_skb(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int idx)
 		struct can_frame *cf = (struct can_frame *)skb->data;
 		u8 dlc = cf->can_dlc;
 
+		if (!(skb->tstamp.tv64))
+			__net_timestamp(skb);
+
 		netif_rx(priv->echo_skb[idx]);
 		priv->echo_skb[idx] = NULL;
 
@@ -575,6 +578,7 @@ struct sk_buff *alloc_can_skb(struct net_device *dev, struct can_frame **cf)
 	if (unlikely(!skb))
 		return NULL;
 
+	__net_timestamp(skb);
 	skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_CAN);
 	skb->pkt_type = PACKET_BROADCAST;
 	skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
@@ -603,6 +607,7 @@ struct sk_buff *alloc_canfd_skb(struct net_device *dev,
 	if (unlikely(!skb))
 		return NULL;
 
+	__net_timestamp(skb);
 	skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_CANFD);
 	skb->pkt_type = PACKET_BROADCAST;
 	skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/slcan.c b/drivers/net/can/slcan.c
index c837eb9..f64f529 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/slcan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/slcan.c
@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ static void slc_bump(struct slcan *sl)
 	if (!skb)
 		return;
 
+	__net_timestamp(skb);
 	skb->dev = sl->dev;
 	skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_CAN);
 	skb->pkt_type = PACKET_BROADCAST;
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/vcan.c b/drivers/net/can/vcan.c
index 674f367..0ce868d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/vcan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/vcan.c
@@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ static void vcan_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 	skb->dev       = dev;
 	skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
 
+	if (!(skb->tstamp.tv64))
+		__net_timestamp(skb);
+
 	netif_rx_ni(skb);
 }
 
diff --git a/net/can/af_can.c b/net/can/af_can.c
index 32d710e..689c818 100644
--- a/net/can/af_can.c
+++ b/net/can/af_can.c
@@ -310,8 +310,12 @@ int can_send(struct sk_buff *skb, int loop)
 		return err;
 	}
 
-	if (newskb)
+	if (newskb) {
+		if (!(newskb->tstamp.tv64))
+			__net_timestamp(newskb);
+
 		netif_rx_ni(newskb);
+	}
 
 	/* update statistics */
 	can_stats.tx_frames++;
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH - regression 4.1-rc8] can: fix loss of CAN frames in raw_rcv Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> - 2015-06-21 19:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH - regression 4.1-rc8] can: fix loss of CAN frames in  raw_rcv Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> - 2015-06-21 19:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH - regression 4.1-rc8] can: fix loss of CAN frames in raw_rcv Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> - 2015-06-21 19:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH - regression 4.1-rc8] can: fix loss of CAN frames in raw_rcv Manfred Schlaegl <manfred.schlaegl@gmx.at> - 2015-06-22 13:50 +0200

csiph-web