Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1163097

Re: [PATCH 08/12] fsl/fman: Add Frame Manager support

From Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 08/12] fsl/fman: Add Frame Manager support
Date 2015-06-11 11:40 +0200
Message-ID <pA77Q-1Bx-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <pzQ6Z-1QR-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pzQ6Z-1QR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pzQ6Z-1QR-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <pzQ6Z-1QR-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <pA6v8-Ch-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


So I couldn't help having yet another look at the code, just to drive
home my point.

On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 10:55 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > +void *fm_drv_init(void)
> 
> static.
> 
> > +{
> > +	memset(&fm_drvs, 0, sizeof(fm_drvs));

fm_drvs is an external variable. It is guaranteed to be zero, isn't it?

> > +	mutex_init(&fm_drv_mutex);
> > +
> > +	/* Register to the DTB for basic FM API */
> > +	platform_driver_register(&fm_driver);
> > +
> > +	return &fm_drvs;

You're returning a pointer to external variable. How's that useful?

And note this is the last time we'll ever see fm_drvs. So I think that
all this variable does for the code is getting initialized to zero,
twice.

> > +}
> > +
> > +int fm_drv_free(void *p_fm_drv)
> 
> static.
> 
> > +{
> > +	platform_driver_unregister(&fm_driver);
> > +	mutex_destroy(&fm_drv_mutex);
> > +
> > +	return 0;

This function has one caller, which doesn't check the return value. So
this should be a function returning void. Of course, a wrapper of two
lines called only once means you should actually not put this into a
separate function.

> > +}

> > +static void *p_fm_drv;
> 
> > +static int __init __cold fm_load(void)
> > +{
> > +	p_fm_drv = fm_drv_init();
> > +	if (!p_fm_drv) {

fm_drv_init() returns a pointer to an external variable. So how can this
happen?

> > +		pr_err("Failed to init FM wrapper!\n");
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	pr_info("Freescale FM module\n");
> > +	return 0;
> > +}

This is all rather basic. It must be, otherwise I wouldn't spot it.

So I keep spotting these basic oddities, with every cup of coffee I
treat myself to while reading through this, wherever I look. By now I'm
sure there's no need for the netdev people to look at this, not yet. 


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 08/12] fsl/fman: Add Frame Manager support Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> - 2015-06-11 11:40 +0200

csiph-web