Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #269816 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-06-01 22:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2024-06-02 19:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 12 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20240501) "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2024-06-01 22:10 +0200
Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" (was: Re: Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20240501)) Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2024-06-02 05:10 +0200
Re: Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2024-06-02 05:20 +0200
Re: Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" (was: Re: Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20240501)) Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2024-06-02 05:20 +0200
Re: Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2024-06-02 05:30 +0200
Re: Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" (was: Re: Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20240501)) "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2024-06-02 12:10 +0200
Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" (was: Re: Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20240501)) eben@gmx.us - 2024-06-02 19:00 +0200
Re: Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2024-06-02 19:10 +0200
Re: Tbird and square brackets in subject field - was - Re: Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2024-06-02 19:20 +0200
Re: Tbird and square brackets in subject field - was - Re: Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2024-06-03 05:30 +0200
Re: Tbird and square brackets in subject field - was - Re: Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2024-06-02 19:20 +0200
Tbird and square brackets in subject field - was - Re: Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2024-06-02 19:20 +0200
| From | "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-01 22:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20240501) |
| Message-ID | <IKDd7-hwBE-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Debian-user is a mailing list provided for support for Debian users, and to facilitate discussion on relevant topics. Codes of Conduct ================ * The list is a Debian communication forum. As such, it is subject to both the Debian mailing list Code of Conduct and the main Debian Code of Conduct https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct Guidelines for this list ======================== Some guidelines which may help explain how the list should work: Language ======== * The language on this mailing list is English. There may be other mailing lists that are language-specific, for example, debian-user-french or debian-user-catalan * It is common for users to be redirected here from other lists, for example, from debian-project. It is also common for people to be posting here when English is not their primary language. Please be considerate. Answering questions and contributing to discussions constructively ================================================================== * This is a fairly busy mailing list but even so you may have to wait some time for an answer - please be patient. * Help and advice on this list is provided by volunteers in their own time. It is common for there to be different opinions or answers provided. * It is not necessary to answer every post on the mailing list. * Be constructive in your responses. It may be that somebody else answers a question before you - if so, you should not reply simply in order to get the last word in, only reply if you can add useful information. Off-topic posts =============== * Please try to stay on topic. * Off-topic posts will happen occasionally as threads wander. Don't reply to them to make them carry on. * If you wish to introduce an off-topic subject that might be of interest to the wider list, start a new thread and preface the title with [OT]. * There is no debian-offtopic mailing list: please don't try to start one. Partisan topics and political arguments ======================================= * Arguments for the sake of it are not welcome here. * Partisan political / religious / cultural arguments do not belong here either. Debian's community is world wide; do not assume others will agree with your views or need to read them on a Debian list. Editing and answering mailing list posts ======================================== * It is helpful to write meaningful subject lines. If you change subject or emphasis in mid-thread, please change the subject line on your email accordingly so that this can be clearly seen. For example: New question [WAS Old topic] * It may also be useful for someone to post a summary email from time to time to explain long threads. * Before posting, it may be useful to check your post for spelling mistakes and scan it for redundancy, duplicate words and redundancy. * Clear replies and a short mailing list thread are much easier to read and follow than long threads. * If you are replying to a post, please reply in-line if possible and cut out extra text that is not relevant to your point. Private replies and responding to posts off-list ================================================ * Please post answers back to the list so others can benefit: private conversations don't benefit people who may only be following along on the list or reading the archives later. * We're only human: you may want to respond to someone off-list to make a point (or to wish them Happy Birthday / comment that you haven't seen them for a long time). We're also a community and the people you find on the list may become familiar friends BUT * Posting outside the list can be unhelpful: bad behaviour outside the lists can't easily be dealt with and will be invisible. You may inadvertently leak personal information by posting a private reply back to the list. If you *do* want to post outside the list - make it clear that you have done so at the top of the message. If someone replies to you privately and you think that this should go back to the list - ask them to post it to the list - do not just do so on their behalf without checking. I can't see what I want here - help me! ======================================= * It is often useful to look through the archives to see whether the issue you wish to raise or a similar issue has been raised before by someone else. The top level link to the archives of this list is at https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/ organised by year, then month. * Although there are only 20 or 30 regular contributors, there may be a couple of thousand readers in the background. Nobody is a mind reader, nobody can sit beside you. Please help by providing useful details if asked, especially which version of Debian you are running. I'm not using Debian but ... ============================ * Strictly, discussions of other distributions are off-topic here. Please note: advice on Linux distributions other than Debian will be only our best guess - other distributions may do things very differently. Any advice given accordingly may be inaccurate but is given in good faith. FAQ topics ========== * There is an FAQ on the Debian wiki derived from some questions asked on this list at https://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser This is a public list, archived in many places ============================================== * One question that comes up on almost all Debian lists from time to time is of the form: "I have done something wrong / included personal details in an email. Could you please delete my name / details / remove the mail" Practically, this is impossible: the mailing lists are archived, potentially cached by Google and so on. Unfortunately, there is nothing much we can do to ensure that all copies anywhere on the Internet are deleted. Asking to do this may only serve to draw further attention - the so-called "Streisand effect" See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect Problems and inappropriate behaviour? ===================================== Complaints about inappropriate behaviour should be referred to the Debian Community Team <community@debian.org>. Inappropriate behaviour on the list may lead to warnings: repeated bad behaviour may lead to temporary or permanent bans for offenders.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-02 05:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" (was: Re: Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20240501)) |
| Message-ID | <IKJLA-iV-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #269816 |
On 02/06/2024 02:59, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > If you change subject > or emphasis in mid-thread, please change the subject line on your email > accordingly so that this can be clearly seen. > > For example: New question [WAS Old topic] Are square brackets intentional here? E.g. thunderbird strips "(was:" subject part from response subject. Perhaps Gnus may treat square brackets as well. I have no idea concerning other mailers. Sorry for violating the rule. Curious users may test if their MUAs recognize "(was: ...)" in the subject and remove old part.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-02 05:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" |
| Message-ID | <IKJVf-rf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #269827 |
On 2/6/24 11:13, Bret Busby wrote: > On 2/6/24 11:09, Greg Wooledge wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 02, 2024 at 10:02:58AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: >>> On 02/06/2024 02:59, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: >>>> If you change subject >>>> or emphasis in mid-thread, please change the subject line on your email >>>> accordingly so that this can be clearly seen. >>>> >>>> For example: New question [WAS Old topic] >>> >>> Are square brackets intentional here? E.g. thunderbird strips "(was:" >>> subject part from response subject. Perhaps Gnus may treat square >>> brackets >>> as well. I have no idea concerning other mailers. >> >> My despair and agony increase every time I hear about some new >> abomination >> that people's mail user agents perform by default. >> >> *face palms, shakes head* >> > > I simply use single hyphen; for example > abomination - was Re: yeti another snowman > or, more appropriately (because it is an abomni nation) abomination - was Re: yeti another country of snowmen ... .... Bret Busby Armadale Western Australia (UTC+0800) .................
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-02 05:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" (was: Re: Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20240501)) |
| Message-ID | <IKJVf-rf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #269827 |
On Sun, Jun 02, 2024 at 10:02:58AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > On 02/06/2024 02:59, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > If you change subject > > or emphasis in mid-thread, please change the subject line on your email > > accordingly so that this can be clearly seen. > > > > For example: New question [WAS Old topic] > > Are square brackets intentional here? E.g. thunderbird strips "(was:" > subject part from response subject. Perhaps Gnus may treat square brackets > as well. I have no idea concerning other mailers. My despair and agony increase every time I hear about some new abomination that people's mail user agents perform by default. *face palms, shakes head*
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-02 05:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" |
| Message-ID | <IKJVf-rf-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #269829 |
On 2/6/24 11:09, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Sun, Jun 02, 2024 at 10:02:58AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: >> On 02/06/2024 02:59, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: >>> If you change subject >>> or emphasis in mid-thread, please change the subject line on your email >>> accordingly so that this can be clearly seen. >>> >>> For example: New question [WAS Old topic] >> >> Are square brackets intentional here? E.g. thunderbird strips "(was:" >> subject part from response subject. Perhaps Gnus may treat square brackets >> as well. I have no idea concerning other mailers. > > My despair and agony increase every time I hear about some new abomination > that people's mail user agents perform by default. > > *face palms, shakes head* > I simply use single hyphen; for example abomination - was Re: yeti another snowman .... Bret Busby Armadale Western Australia (UTC+0800) .................
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-02 12:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" (was: Re: Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20240501)) |
| Message-ID | <IKQk1-4nX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #269827 |
On Sun, Jun 02, 2024 at 10:02:58AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > On 02/06/2024 02:59, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > If you change subject > > or emphasis in mid-thread, please change the subject line on your email > > accordingly so that this can be clearly seen. > > > > For example: New question [WAS Old topic] > > Are square brackets intentional here? E.g. thunderbird strips "(was:" > subject part from response subject. Perhaps Gnus may treat square brackets > as well. I have no idea concerning other mailers. > No - the square brackets are an example :) Square brackets can be noticed, perhaps, and the effort to type them may be worth the distinctiveness, but what I really wanted was to make the distinction visually clear so that the reader would notice it.. I routinely type ammedments to the subject in square brackets and add WAS in upper case so that this is immediately apparent in a long email thread. Whatever your mailer does is fine but it needs to stand out clearly. Similarly, whenever I reply to something on behalf of the Community Team, I add that in square brackets to show that it is distinct. New topic - brackets or parentheses (WAS: Debian-user Monthly FAQ) might be appropriate here. So that email subjects don't go beyond 72 characters, you may always need to abbreviate the amended subject. [WAS: WAS: WAS (previous subject)] would be too many levels of off-topic discussion - but this discussion is still, just about, on topic. All the very best, as ever, Andy Cater (amacater@debian.org) > Sorry for violating the rule. Curious users may test if their MUAs recognize > "(was: ...)" in the subject and remove old part. > > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | eben@gmx.us |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-02 19:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" (was: Re: Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20240501)) |
| Message-ID | <IKWIN-83w-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #269827 |
On 6/1/24 23:02, Max Nikulin wrote: > On 02/06/2024 02:59, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: >> If you change subject >> or emphasis in mid-thread, please change the subject line on your email >> accordingly so that this can be clearly seen. >> >> For example: New question [WAS Old topic] > > Are square brackets intentional here? E.g. thunderbird strips "(was:" > subject part from response subject. This is true. I (on Thunderbird 115) had to restore the subject line after Thunderbird modified it. Do you know of a plugin or weird setting to make it stop doing that? Web searches were fruitless. -- A mob with torches and pitchforks approaches the castle. "Sire, the peasants are revolting!" "Yeah, disgusting, aren't they?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-02 19:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" |
| Message-ID | <IKWSt-8nh-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #269840 |
On 3/6/24 00:52, eben@gmx.us wrote: > On 6/1/24 23:02, Max Nikulin wrote: >> On 02/06/2024 02:59, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: >>> If you change subject >>> or emphasis in mid-thread, please change the subject line on your email >>> accordingly so that this can be clearly seen. >>> >>> For example: New question [WAS Old topic] >> >> Are square brackets intentional here? E.g. thunderbird strips "(was:" >> subject part from response subject. > > This is true. I (on Thunderbird 115) had to restore the subject line after > Thunderbird modified it. Do you know of a plugin or weird setting to make > it stop doing that? Web searches were fruitless. > > -- > A mob with torches and pitchforks approaches the castle. > "Sire, the peasants are revolting!" > "Yeah, disgusting, aren't they?" > I am using Tbird "115.11.0 (64-bit)" and, in checking, have found that square brackets are apparently not molested in this version of Tbird. In checking in my Inbox, for email from a mailing list that uses mailing list name subject field prepending, I observed that the GnuCash mailing list uses such prepending, and the subject line "Re: [GNC] Problem with New Account Creation" is apparently not molested by Tbird. Similarly, with this (the Debian users) list, "Re: [solved] Re: No login with Debian 12 ssh client, ssh-rsa key, Debian 8 sshd" and "Re: [Solved]: What DE to replace GNOME with?" appear to be unmolested by Tbird. Whilst I regard Tbird after v102.x, as a pile of faecal matter, having been downgraded from v102.x (the higher the version number, the greater the degree of downgrading), the reported problem involving square brackets in the subject field, is not apparent on this system, making me wonder whether the reported problem, is an effect of either affected users' settings, or, desktop environments, or, themes. .. Bret Busby Armadale West Australia (UTC+0800) ..............
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-02 19:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Tbird and square brackets in subject field - was - Re: Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" |
| Message-ID | <IKX29-8sg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #269841 |
On 3/6/24 01:16, Bret Busby wrote: > On 3/6/24 01:09, Bret Busby wrote: >> On 3/6/24 01:06, Bret Busby wrote: >>> On 3/6/24 00:52, eben@gmx.us wrote: >>>> On 6/1/24 23:02, Max Nikulin wrote: >>>>> On 02/06/2024 02:59, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: >>>>>> If you change subject >>>>>> or emphasis in mid-thread, please change the subject line on your >>>>>> email >>>>>> accordingly so that this can be clearly seen. >>>>>> >>>>>> For example: New question [WAS Old topic] >>>>> >>>>> Are square brackets intentional here? E.g. thunderbird strips "(was:" >>>>> subject part from response subject. >>>> >>>> This is true. I (on Thunderbird 115) had to restore the subject >>>> line after >>>> Thunderbird modified it. Do you know of a plugin or weird setting >>>> to make >>>> it stop doing that? Web searches were fruitless. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> A mob with torches and pitchforks approaches the castle. >>>> "Sire, the peasants are revolting!" >>>> "Yeah, disgusting, aren't they?" >>>> >>> I am using Tbird "115.11.0 (64-bit)" and, in checking, have found >>> that square brackets are apparently not molested in this version of >>> Tbird. >>> >>> In checking in my Inbox, for email from a mailing list that uses >>> mailing list name subject field prepending, I observed that the >>> GnuCash mailing list uses such prepending, and the subject line >>> "Re: [GNC] Problem with New Account Creation" >>> is apparently not molested by Tbird. >>> >>> >>> Similarly, with this (the Debian users) list, >>> "Re: [solved] Re: No login with Debian 12 ssh client, ssh-rsa key, >>> Debian 8 sshd" >>> and >>> "Re: [Solved]: What DE to replace GNOME with?" >>> appear to be unmolested by Tbird. >>> >>> Whilst I regard Tbird after v102.x, as a pile of faecal matter, >>> having been downgraded from v102.x (the higher the version number, >>> the greater the degree of downgrading), the reported problem >>> involving square brackets in the subject field, is not apparent on >>> this system, making me wonder whether the reported problem, is an >>> effect of either affected users' settings, or, desktop environments, >>> or, themes. >>> >>> .. >>> Bret Busby >>> Armadale >>> West Australia >>> (UTC+0800) >>> .............. >>> >> Sorry - I should have changed the subject field value, in my last >> previous post, to more properly refer to where this thread has gone. >> >> .. >> Bret Busby >> Armadale >> West Australia >> (UTC+0800) >> .............. >> > Similarly to the above examples; just came through - the subject field > "[SECURITY] [DSA 5703-1] linux security update" > is also unmolested by Tbird. > > And, that has two sets of square brackets. > Also, from the claws-mail users mailing list; "Re: [Users] How to check if Bogofilter is still working?" ... .. Bret Busby Armadale West Australia (UTC+0800) ..............
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-03 05:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Tbird and square brackets in subject field - was - Re: Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" |
| Message-ID | <IL6yt-efa-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #269842 |
On 03/06/2024 00:19, Bret Busby wrote: > On 3/6/24 01:16, Bret Busby wrote: >> On 3/6/24 01:09, Bret Busby wrote: >>> On 3/6/24 01:06, Bret Busby wrote: >>>>> On 6/1/24 23:02, Max Nikulin wrote: >>>>>> On 02/06/2024 02:59, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For example: New question [WAS Old topic] >>>>>> >>>>>> Are square brackets intentional here? E.g. thunderbird strips "(was:" >>>>>> subject part from response subject. [...] >>>> "Re: [GNC] Problem with New Account Creation" >>>> is apparently not molested by Tbird. [...] >>>> "Re: [solved] Re: No login with Debian 12 ssh client, ssh-rsa key, >>>> Debian 8 sshd" [...] >> "[SECURITY] [DSA 5703-1] linux security update" [...] > "Re: [Users] How to check if Bogofilter is still working?" Relax. In the case of thunderbird the pattern is namely " (was:". It is not configurable, but I do not expect significant rate of false positives. I do not see any problem with this behavior as the default. When subject is changed you see both old and new variants. In follow-ups it allows to keep subject concise without additional efforts from users. Messages still have links to all messages in the thread in the References header, so you may find original subject if you need it. UI may offer to revert subject to the original one and I would consider it as an improvement. Regexp in Emacs includes square bracket and variation of case. However there are more tunables: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/tree/lisp/gnus/message.el#n321 - `message-subject-trailing-was-query' - `message-subject-trailing-was-ask-regexp' - `message-subject-trailing-was-regexp' I accidentally noticed stripping old subject part in another mailing list, so I was curious if "[WAS" in the FAQ follows another convention than thunderbird implements. Andrew clarified that it is just an example and it is intended for humans. It seems thunderbird may add "(was:", but I have never used message templates.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-02 19:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Tbird and square brackets in subject field - was - Re: Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" |
| Message-ID | <IKX29-8sg-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #269841 |
On 3/6/24 01:09, Bret Busby wrote: > On 3/6/24 01:06, Bret Busby wrote: >> On 3/6/24 00:52, eben@gmx.us wrote: >>> On 6/1/24 23:02, Max Nikulin wrote: >>>> On 02/06/2024 02:59, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: >>>>> If you change subject >>>>> or emphasis in mid-thread, please change the subject line on your >>>>> email >>>>> accordingly so that this can be clearly seen. >>>>> >>>>> For example: New question [WAS Old topic] >>>> >>>> Are square brackets intentional here? E.g. thunderbird strips "(was:" >>>> subject part from response subject. >>> >>> This is true. I (on Thunderbird 115) had to restore the subject line >>> after >>> Thunderbird modified it. Do you know of a plugin or weird setting to >>> make >>> it stop doing that? Web searches were fruitless. >>> >>> -- >>> A mob with torches and pitchforks approaches the castle. >>> "Sire, the peasants are revolting!" >>> "Yeah, disgusting, aren't they?" >>> >> I am using Tbird "115.11.0 (64-bit)" and, in checking, have found that >> square brackets are apparently not molested in this version of Tbird. >> >> In checking in my Inbox, for email from a mailing list that uses >> mailing list name subject field prepending, I observed that the >> GnuCash mailing list uses such prepending, and the subject line >> "Re: [GNC] Problem with New Account Creation" >> is apparently not molested by Tbird. >> >> >> Similarly, with this (the Debian users) list, >> "Re: [solved] Re: No login with Debian 12 ssh client, ssh-rsa key, >> Debian 8 sshd" >> and >> "Re: [Solved]: What DE to replace GNOME with?" >> appear to be unmolested by Tbird. >> >> Whilst I regard Tbird after v102.x, as a pile of faecal matter, having >> been downgraded from v102.x (the higher the version number, the >> greater the degree of downgrading), the reported problem involving >> square brackets in the subject field, is not apparent on this system, >> making me wonder whether the reported problem, is an effect of either >> affected users' settings, or, desktop environments, or, themes. >> >> .. >> Bret Busby >> Armadale >> West Australia >> (UTC+0800) >> .............. >> > Sorry - I should have changed the subject field value, in my last > previous post, to more properly refer to where this thread has gone. > > .. > Bret Busby > Armadale > West Australia > (UTC+0800) > .............. > Similarly to the above examples; just came through - the subject field "[SECURITY] [DSA 5703-1] linux security update" is also unmolested by Tbird. And, that has two sets of square brackets. .. Bret Busby Armadale West Australia (UTC+0800) ..............
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-02 19:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Tbird and square brackets in subject field - was - Re: Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" |
| Message-ID | <IKX29-8sg-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #269841 |
On 3/6/24 01:06, Bret Busby wrote: > On 3/6/24 00:52, eben@gmx.us wrote: >> On 6/1/24 23:02, Max Nikulin wrote: >>> On 02/06/2024 02:59, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: >>>> If you change subject >>>> or emphasis in mid-thread, please change the subject line on your email >>>> accordingly so that this can be clearly seen. >>>> >>>> For example: New question [WAS Old topic] >>> >>> Are square brackets intentional here? E.g. thunderbird strips "(was:" >>> subject part from response subject. >> >> This is true. I (on Thunderbird 115) had to restore the subject line >> after >> Thunderbird modified it. Do you know of a plugin or weird setting to >> make >> it stop doing that? Web searches were fruitless. >> >> -- >> A mob with torches and pitchforks approaches the castle. >> "Sire, the peasants are revolting!" >> "Yeah, disgusting, aren't they?" >> > I am using Tbird "115.11.0 (64-bit)" and, in checking, have found that > square brackets are apparently not molested in this version of Tbird. > > In checking in my Inbox, for email from a mailing list that uses mailing > list name subject field prepending, I observed that the GnuCash mailing > list uses such prepending, and the subject line > "Re: [GNC] Problem with New Account Creation" > is apparently not molested by Tbird. > > > Similarly, with this (the Debian users) list, > "Re: [solved] Re: No login with Debian 12 ssh client, ssh-rsa key, > Debian 8 sshd" > and > "Re: [Solved]: What DE to replace GNOME with?" > appear to be unmolested by Tbird. > > Whilst I regard Tbird after v102.x, as a pile of faecal matter, having > been downgraded from v102.x (the higher the version number, the greater > the degree of downgrading), the reported problem involving square > brackets in the subject field, is not apparent on this system, making me > wonder whether the reported problem, is an effect of either affected > users' settings, or, desktop environments, or, themes. > > .. > Bret Busby > Armadale > West Australia > (UTC+0800) > .............. > Sorry - I should have changed the subject field value, in my last previous post, to more properly refer to where this thread has gone. .. Bret Busby Armadale West Australia (UTC+0800) ..............
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web