Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #266971 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Henrik Morsing <henrik@morsing.cc> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-02-05 09:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2024-02-05 23:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 6 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
tn5250 Henrik Morsing <henrik@morsing.cc> - 2024-02-05 09:30 +0100
Re: tn5250 Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2024-02-05 10:00 +0100
Re: tn5250 Henrik Morsing <henrik@morsing.cc> - 2024-02-05 10:00 +0100
Re: tn5250 Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2024-02-05 22:20 +0100
Re: tn5250 Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-02-05 23:40 +0100
Re: tn5250 Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-02-05 23:50 +0100
| From | Henrik Morsing <henrik@morsing.cc> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-02-05 09:30 +0100 |
| Subject | tn5250 |
| Message-ID | <I42wy-815M-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Good morning, Does anyone know the reason from removing the tn5250 emulator from the package system? It is still maintained and available in other distros. Regards, Henrik Morsing --
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-02-05 10:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <I42Zz-81fZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #266971 |
On 5 Feb 2024 08:28 +0000, from henrik@morsing.cc (Henrik Morsing): > Does anyone know the reason from removing the tn5250 emulator from > the package system? It is still maintained and available in other > distros. https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tn5250 https://tracker.debian.org/news/219802/bug540953-removed-packages-from-unstable/ https://bugs.debian.org/540953 -- Michael Kjörling 🔗 https://michael.kjorling.se “Remember when, on the Internet, nobody cared that you were a dog?”
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Henrik Morsing <henrik@morsing.cc> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-02-05 10:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <I42Zz-81fZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #266972 |
On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 08:55:33AM +0000, Michael Kjörling wrote: >On 5 Feb 2024 08:28 +0000, from henrik@morsing.cc (Henrik Morsing): >> Does anyone know the reason from removing the tn5250 emulator from >> the package system? It is still maintained and available in other >> distros. > >https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tn5250 > >https://tracker.debian.org/news/219802/bug540953-removed-packages-from-unstable/ > >https://bugs.debian.org/540953 > https://github.com/tn5250/tn5250?tab=readme-ov-file Ok, so it can be added again, thanks. Regards, Henrik Morsing
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-02-05 22:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <I4exH-88Gh-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #266973 |
On 5 Feb 2024 08:58 +0000, from henrik@morsing.cc (Henrik Morsing): >> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tn5250 >> >> https://tracker.debian.org/news/219802/bug540953-removed-packages-from-unstable/ >> >> https://bugs.debian.org/540953 > > Ok, so it can be added again, thanks. I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure a debian-user list post is not the preferred way to request addition of a package that hasn't been in Debian for some 12-13 years. -- Michael Kjörling 🔗 https://michael.kjorling.se “Remember when, on the Internet, nobody cared that you were a dog?”
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-02-05 23:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <I4fN8-89lY-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #267003 |
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 4:14 PM Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> wrote: > > On 5 Feb 2024 08:58 +0000, from henrik@morsing.cc (Henrik Morsing): > >> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tn5250 > >> > >> https://tracker.debian.org/news/219802/bug540953-removed-packages-from-unstable/ > >> > >> https://bugs.debian.org/540953 > > > > Ok, so it can be added again, thanks. > > I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure a debian-user list post is not > the preferred way to request addition of a package that hasn't been in > Debian for some 12-13 years. Requesting a former package seems to be a grey area: <https://wiki.debian.org/RFP>. A former package seems to violate the criteria "It is not packaged yet" to make the request. I'm guessing that it should say something along the lines, "it is not currently packaged." Jeff
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-02-05 23:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <I4fWN-89pc-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #266972 |
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 3:56 AM Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> wrote: > > On 5 Feb 2024 08:28 +0000, from henrik@morsing.cc (Henrik Morsing): > > Does anyone know the reason from removing the tn5250 emulator from > > the package system? It is still maintained and available in other > > distros. > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tn5250 > > https://tracker.debian.org/news/219802/bug540953-removed-packages-from-unstable/ > > https://bugs.debian.org/540953 This looks like the one Henrik would be interested in. It is the WNPP bug report: <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826643>. Also see <https://wnpp.debian.net/>, where tn5250 is a hit in the database. Jeff
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web