Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #267009

Re: tn5250

From Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: tn5250
Date 2024-02-05 23:40 +0100
Message-ID <I4fN8-89lY-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <I42wy-815M-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <I42Zz-81fZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <I42Zz-81fZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <I4exH-88Gh-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 4:14 PM Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> wrote:
>
> On 5 Feb 2024 08:58 +0000, from henrik@morsing.cc (Henrik Morsing):
> >> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tn5250
> >>
> >> https://tracker.debian.org/news/219802/bug540953-removed-packages-from-unstable/
> >>
> >> https://bugs.debian.org/540953
> >
> > Ok, so it can be added again, thanks.
>
> I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure a debian-user list post is not
> the preferred way to request addition of a package that hasn't been in
> Debian for some 12-13 years.

Requesting a former package seems to be a grey area:
<https://wiki.debian.org/RFP>.

A former package seems to violate the criteria "It is not packaged
yet" to make the request. I'm guessing that it should say something
along the lines, "it is not currently packaged."

Jeff

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

tn5250 Henrik Morsing <henrik@morsing.cc> - 2024-02-05 09:30 +0100
  Re: tn5250 Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2024-02-05 10:00 +0100
    Re: tn5250 Henrik Morsing <henrik@morsing.cc> - 2024-02-05 10:00 +0100
      Re: tn5250 Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2024-02-05 22:20 +0100
        Re: tn5250 Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-02-05 23:40 +0100
    Re: tn5250 Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-02-05 23:50 +0100

csiph-web