Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #239050 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-08-19 18:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2021-08-20 15:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
Typical timescales for publishing binary packages in -backports? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2021-08-19 18:20 +0200
Re: Typical timescales for publishing binary packages in -backports? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-19 21:30 +0200
Re: Typical timescales for publishing binary packages in -backports? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2021-08-20 15:50 +0200
| From | Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-19 18:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Typical timescales for publishing binary packages in -backports? |
| Message-ID | <CNSVQ-3oE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi,
I notice that yesterday there's been an acceptance email for source
package linux-signed-amd64 version 5.10.46+4~bpo10+1 in
buster-backports:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2021/08/msg00139.html
Previously there had also been one for version 5.10.46+3~bpo10+1.
Yet as of today there seems to only be binary packages built from
version 5.10.46+2~bpo10+1:
$ apt show linux-image-amd64/buster-backports
Package: linux-image-amd64
Version: 5.10.46-2~bpo10+1
Built-Using: linux (= 5.10.46-2~bpo10+1)
Priority: optional
Section: kernel
Source: linux-signed-amd64 (5.10.46+2~bpo10+1)
This is from back in July sometime.
So I was wondering what is the typical timescale for binary packages
from the kernel source upload to appear in buster-backports?
I am aware that I can build the binary packages myself if I want
them sooner. It looks like I could also install the package from sid
or bookworm:
https://packages.debian.org/sid/linux-image-amd64
Cheers,
Andy
--
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-19 21:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CNVTJ-5gb-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #239050 |
On Thu 19 Aug 2021 at 16:16:01 +0000, Andy Smith wrote: > Hi, > > I notice that yesterday there's been an acceptance email for source > package linux-signed-amd64 version 5.10.46+4~bpo10+1 in > buster-backports: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2021/08/msg00139.html > > Previously there had also been one for version 5.10.46+3~bpo10+1. > > Yet as of today there seems to only be binary packages built from > version 5.10.46+2~bpo10+1: > > $ apt show linux-image-amd64/buster-backports > Package: linux-image-amd64 > Version: 5.10.46-2~bpo10+1 > Built-Using: linux (= 5.10.46-2~bpo10+1) > Priority: optional > Section: kernel > Source: linux-signed-amd64 (5.10.46+2~bpo10+1) > > This is from back in July sometime. > > So I was wondering what is the typical timescale for binary packages > from the kernel source upload to appear in buster-backports? I do not think there is a typical timescale. -backports is by special effort for any of its packages. Perhaps "soon" is the best that can be predicted. -- Brian.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-20 15:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <COd4e-7Ht-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #239059 |
Hello, On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 08:26:07PM +0100, Brian wrote: > On Thu 19 Aug 2021 at 16:16:01 +0000, Andy Smith wrote: > > So I was wondering what is the typical timescale for binary packages > > from the kernel source upload to appear in buster-backports? > > I do not think there is a typical timescale. -backports is by special > effort for any of its packages. Perhaps "soon" is the best that can be > predicted. Hah, today is the day, apparently! Thanks, Andy
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web