Typical timescales for publishing binary packages in -backports?

From	Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Typical timescales for publishing binary packages in -backports?
Date	2021-08-19 18:20 +0200
Message-ID	<CNSVQ-3oE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hi,

I notice that yesterday there's been an acceptance email for source
package linux-signed-amd64 version 5.10.46+4~bpo10+1 in
buster-backports:

    https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2021/08/msg00139.html

Previously there had also been one for version 5.10.46+3~bpo10+1.

Yet as of today there seems to only be binary packages built from
version 5.10.46+2~bpo10+1:

$ apt show linux-image-amd64/buster-backports
Package: linux-image-amd64
Version: 5.10.46-2~bpo10+1
Built-Using: linux (= 5.10.46-2~bpo10+1)
Priority: optional
Section: kernel
Source: linux-signed-amd64 (5.10.46+2~bpo10+1)

This is from back in July sometime.

So I was wondering what is the typical timescale for binary packages
from the kernel source upload to appear in buster-backports?

I am aware that I can build the binary packages myself if I want
them sooner. It looks like I could also install the package from sid
or bookworm:

    https://packages.debian.org/sid/linux-image-amd64

Cheers,
Andy

-- 
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Typical timescales for publishing binary packages in -backports? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2021-08-19 18:20 +0200
  Re: Typical timescales for publishing binary packages in -backports? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-08-19 21:30 +0200
    Re: Typical timescales for publishing binary packages in -backports? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2021-08-20 15:50 +0200

csiph-web