Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #227331 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2020-09-25 13:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2020-09-28 19:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 23 — 9 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.user
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> - 2020-09-25 13:50 +0200
Re: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2020-09-25 14:50 +0200
Re: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> - 2020-09-25 15:10 +0200
Re: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2020-09-25 15:20 +0200
Re: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> - 2020-09-25 15:40 +0200
Re: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-09-25 17:20 +0200
Re: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2020-09-26 09:20 +0200
Re: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download Fabien Roucaute <fabien.roucaute@free.fr> - 2020-09-25 16:50 +0200
Re: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download Kushal Kumaran <kushal@locationd.net> - 2020-09-26 02:50 +0200
Re: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2020-09-26 03:00 +0200
Re: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> - 2020-09-26 11:20 +0200
Re: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2020-09-26 12:10 +0200
Re: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> - 2020-09-26 12:30 +0200
Re: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> - 2020-09-27 13:40 +0200
Re: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-09-27 15:30 +0200
Re: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> - 2020-09-27 17:10 +0200
Re: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-09-27 17:40 +0200
Re: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-09-27 18:50 +0200
Re: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> - 2020-09-27 19:10 +0200
Re: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-09-27 19:40 +0200
Re: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> - 2020-09-28 15:50 +0200
Re: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download Kushal Kumaran <kushal@locationd.net> - 2020-09-28 17:00 +0200
Re: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2020-09-28 19:20 +0200
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
| From | "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-25 13:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download |
| Message-ID | <ASUoF-7Tw-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
I am running up-to-date Buster, unfortunately there seems to be a bit of a problem. Normally I run the update process several times a week with the command sudo apr update && sudo apt upgrade. This morning this resulted in the error The following partially installed packages will be configured: brscan4 No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed. 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64' After unpacking 0 B will be used. E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64' E: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download E: Perhaps the package lists are out of date, please try 'aptitude update' (or equivalent); otherwise some packages or versions are not available from the current repository sources I reinstalled the Brother printer drivers, apparently barscan4 was not included. I contgaced Brother tech support, but was told that they did not support Linux. I tried: sudo mv /var/lib/apt/lists /var/lib/apt/lists.old sudo apt-get clean sudo apt-get update This resulted in a long list of get: (ellipses) followed by my user prompt. Unfortunately, update generated the same errors. At this point I don't have the faintest idea as to how to proceed. Pointers towards a solution to the problem will be much appreciated. Thanks in advance. -- Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D. www.molecular-modeling.net 614.312.7528 (c) Skype: smolnar1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-25 14:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ASVkJ-8rY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #227331 |
Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > I am running up-to-date Buster, unfortunately there seems to be a bit of a > problem. > > Normally I run the update process several times a week with the command sudo > apr update && sudo apt upgrade. This morning this resulted in the error > > The following partially installed packages will be configured: > brscan4 > No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed. > 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64' > After unpacking 0 B will be used. > E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64' > E: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download > E: Perhaps the package lists are out of date, please try 'aptitude update' > (or equivalent); otherwise some packages or versions are not available from > the current repository sources > > I reinstalled the Brother printer drivers, apparently barscan4 was not > included. I contgaced Brother tech support, but was told that they did not > support Linux. > > I tried: > > sudo mv /var/lib/apt/lists /var/lib/apt/lists.old > sudo apt-get clean > sudo apt-get update > > This resulted in a long list of get: (ellipses) followed by my user > prompt. Unfortunately, update generated the same errors. > > At this point I don't have the faintest idea as to how to proceed. Pointers > towards a solution to the problem will be much appreciated. apt-get update fetches package lists apt-get upgrade fetches and install packages In this case, I think you have a problem with update, which leads to the problem with upgrade. Check your /etc/apt/sources.list and entries in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ Something probably is not responding. There are mirrors for most repos, so pick different mirrors, or use http://deb.debian.org/debian/ -dsr-
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-25 15:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ASVE5-m6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #227337 |
On 09/25/2020 08:49 AM, Dan Ritter wrote: > Stephen P. Molnar wrote: >> I am running up-to-date Buster, unfortunately there seems to be a bit of a >> problem. >> >> Normally I run the update process several times a week with the command sudo >> apr update && sudo apt upgrade. This morning this resulted in the error >> >> The following partially installed packages will be configured: >> brscan4 >> No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed. >> 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. >> E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64' >> After unpacking 0 B will be used. >> E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64' >> E: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download >> E: Perhaps the package lists are out of date, please try 'aptitude update' >> (or equivalent); otherwise some packages or versions are not available from >> the current repository sources >> >> I reinstalled the Brother printer drivers, apparently barscan4 was not >> included. I contgaced Brother tech support, but was told that they did not >> support Linux. >> >> I tried: >> >> sudo mv /var/lib/apt/lists /var/lib/apt/lists.old >> sudo apt-get clean >> sudo apt-get update >> >> This resulted in a long list of get: (ellipses) followed by my user >> prompt. Unfortunately, update generated the same errors. >> >> At this point I don't have the faintest idea as to how to proceed. Pointers >> towards a solution to the problem will be much appreciated. > apt-get update fetches package lists > apt-get upgrade fetches and install packages > > In this case, I think you have a problem with update, which > leads to the problem with upgrade. > > Check your /etc/apt/sources.list and entries in > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ > > Something probably is not responding. There are mirrors for most > repos, so pick different mirrors, or use > http://deb.debian.org/debian/ > > -dsr- > > Many thanks for the quick response. Here is my edited sources.list: deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.1.0 _Buster_ - Official amd64 DVD Binary-1 20190908-01:09]/ buster contrib main # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.1.0 _Buster_ - Official amd64 DVD Binary-1 20190908-01:09]/ buster contrib main deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ buster main non-free contrib deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ buster main non-free contrib deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ buster/updates main contrib non-free deb-src http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ buster/updates main contrib non-free # buster-updates, previously known as 'volatile' deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ buster-updates main contrib non-free deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ buster-updates non-free contrib main Unfortunately, I got the same error list. -- Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D. www.molecular-modeling.net 614.312.7528 (c) Skype: smolnar1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-25 15:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ASVNL-ph-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #227340 |
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 09:08:09AM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > Here is my edited sources.list: Your *what*?! What do you mean, "edited"? Do you mean, "here is a file that is not my sources.list, but some part of it may be similar, and you get to guess what the real one contains"? How is that helpful? How about: you post the ACTUAL sources.list file, plus any ACTUAL files under sources.list.d. Then, you post the ACTUAL command you are typing and its ACTUAL output. (At this point, the most likely scenario is either "my secret sources.list contains third-party repositories that are broken but I won't let you know that", or "some of the files in /var/lib/apt/lists/ have become corrupt". Good luck figuring out which one is true when the information needed to determine that is all kept from you.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-25 15:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ASW77-vh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #227341 |
On 09/25/2020 09:13 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 09:08:09AM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: >> Here is my edited sources.list: > Your *what*?! > > What do you mean, "edited"? Do you mean, "here is a file that is not > my sources.list, but some part of it may be similar, and you get to guess > what the real one contains"? How is that helpful? > > How about: you post the ACTUAL sources.list file, plus any ACTUAL files > under sources.list.d. > > Then, you post the ACTUAL command you are typing and its ACTUAL output. > > (At this point, the most likely scenario is either "my secret sources.list > contains third-party repositories that are broken but I won't let you > know that", or "some of the files in /var/lib/apt/lists/ have become > corrupt". Good luck figuring out which one is true when the information > needed to determine that is all kept from you.) > > Sorry, nonexistent proof reading. Here are the requested files sources.list: # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.1.0 _Buster_ - Official amd64 DVD Binary-1 20190908-01:09]/ buster contrib main # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.1.0 _Buster_ - Official amd64 DVD Binary-1 20190908-01:09]/ buster contrib main deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ buster main non-free contrib deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ buster main non-free contrib deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ buster/updates main contrib non-free deb-src http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ buster/updates main contrib non-free # buster-updates, previously known as 'volatile' deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ buster-updates main contrib non-free deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ buster-updates non-free contrib main Contents of /etc/apt/sourceslist.d: dropbox.list google-chrome.list google-earth-pro.list mendeleydesktop.list skype-stable.list vscode.list -- Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D. www.molecular-modeling.net 614.312.7528 (c) Skype: smolnar1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-25 17:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ASXFT-1x7-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #227343 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Vi, 25 sep 20, 09:32:27, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> >
> Sorry, nonexistent proof reading.
>
> Here are the requested files
>
> sources.list:
>
> # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.1.0 _Buster_ - Official amd64 DVD Binary-1
> 20190908-01:09]/ buster contrib main
>
> # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 10.1.0 _Buster_ - Official amd64 DVD Binary-1
> 20190908-01:09]/ buster contrib main
>
> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ buster main non-free contrib
> deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ buster main non-free contrib
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ buster/updates main contrib
> non-free
> deb-src http://security.debian.org/debian-security/ buster/updates main
> contrib non-free
These should be two long lines. Are the line breaks here in the file or
added by your mail program? In order to prevent any mangling please
*attach* the file (yes, the mailing list does accept attachments of
reasonable size).
> # buster-updates, previously known as 'volatile'
> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ buster-updates main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ buster-updates non-free contrib main
>
>
> Contents of /etc/apt/sourceslist.d:
^^^ I'm guessing you missed a dot here
> dropbox.list
> google-chrome.list
> google-earth-pro.list
> mendeleydesktop.list
> skype-stable.list
> vscode.list
Please attach these as well in addition to full and unedited output of
'apt update'.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-26 09:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ATcEV-25z-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #227341 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 09:13:28AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 09:08:09AM -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > > Here is my edited sources.list: > > Your *what*?! [...] Greg, your knowledge is invaluable here. And while I do agree with the content of your post, the form is... uh, could be improved. Cheers - t
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabien Roucaute <fabien.roucaute@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-25 16:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ASXcR-17T-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #227331 |
Le 25/09/2020 à 13:48, Stephen P. Molnar a écrit : > I am running up-to-date Buster, unfortunately there seems to be a bit of > a problem. > > Normally I run the update process several times a week with the command > sudo apr update && sudo apt upgrade. This morning this resulted in the > error > > The following partially installed packages will be configured: > brscan4 > No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed. > 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64' > After unpacking 0 B will be used. > E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64' > E: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download > E: Perhaps the package lists are out of date, please try 'aptitude > update' (or equivalent); otherwise some packages or versions are not > available from the current repository sources > > I reinstalled the Brother printer drivers, apparently barscan4 was not > included. I contgaced Brother tech support, but was told that they did > not support Linux. > > I tried: > > sudo mv /var/lib/apt/lists /var/lib/apt/lists.old > sudo apt-get clean > sudo apt-get update > > This resulted in a long list of get: (ellipses) followed by my user > prompt. Unfortunately, update generated the same errors. > > At this point I don't have the faintest idea as to how to proceed. > Pointers towards a solution to the problem will be much appreciated. > > Thanks in advance. > Look like a package that is a dependency to barscan4 have been updated to version that need barscan4 to be at least the version 0.4.8-1, but barscan4 is not on the debian repositories. I think you have to download it and install it manually.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kushal Kumaran <kushal@locationd.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-26 02:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <AT6zv-6Gj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #227331 |
On Fri, Sep 25 2020 at 07:48:28 AM, "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > I am running up-to-date Buster, unfortunately there seems to be a bit > of a problem. > > Normally I run the update process several times a week with the > command sudo apr update && sudo apt upgrade. This morning this > resulted in the error > > The following partially installed packages will be configured: > brscan4 > No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed. > 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. > E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64' > After unpacking 0 B will be used. > E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64' > E: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download > E: Perhaps the package lists are out of date, please try 'aptitude > update' (or equivalent); otherwise some packages or versions are not > available from the current repository sources > > I reinstalled the Brother printer drivers, apparently barscan4 was not > included. I contgaced Brother tech support, but was told that they did > not support Linux. brscan4 is the package with the scanner driver. That is provided as a separate download. In my setup, it did not have a debian repository; it was provided as a bare .deb download. > > I tried: > > sudo mv /var/lib/apt/lists /var/lib/apt/lists.old > sudo apt-get clean > sudo apt-get update > > This resulted in a long list of get: (ellipses) followed by my user > prompt. Unfortunately, update generated the same errors. > > At this point I don't have the faintest idea as to how to > proceed. Pointers towards a solution to the problem will be much > appreciated. > Try dpkg --configure -a to finish configuration for partially installed packages. If your device is supported by https://github.com/alexpevzner/sane-airscan, you can just switch to that and ditch the Brother software. -- regards, kushal
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-26 03:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <AT6Jb-6JU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #227331 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 2020-09-25 at 07:48, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> I am running up-to-date Buster, unfortunately there seems to be a bit of
> a problem.
>
> Normally I run the update process several times a week with the command
> sudo apr update && sudo apt upgrade.
^
I'm presuming this is a pure mail-writing typo.
> This morning this resulted in the error
>
> The following partially installed packages will be configured:
> brscan4
As I think at least one other person has noted, this does not appear to
be available in the Debian archives, at least not as far as I've managed
to determine.
> No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
> 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64'
> After unpacking 0 B will be used.
> E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64'
To my eye, this looks as if something is telling apt that version
0.4.8-1 is available somewhere, and the upgrade session is deciding that
it needs to install that version, but then none of the configured
sources include that version (and it's not already cached locally).
What do
$ apt-cache policy brscan4
$ apt-cache rdepends brscan4
say?
--
The Wanderer
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all
progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-26 11:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ATex3-3cl-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #227376 |
On 09/25/2020 08:53 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2020-09-25 at 07:48, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
>
>> I am running up-to-date Buster, unfortunately there seems to be a bit of
>> a problem.
>>
>> Normally I run the update process several times a week with the command
>> sudo apr update && sudo apt upgrade.
> ^
>
> I'm presuming this is a pure mail-writing typo.
Correct.
>> This morning this resulted in the error
>>
>> The following partially installed packages will be configured:
>> brscan4
> As I think at least one other person has noted, this does not appear to
> be available in the Debian archives, at least not as far as I've managed
> to determine.
That's correct. It is pat of the Brother Laser Printer driver package.
>> No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
>> 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
>> E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64'
>> After unpacking 0 B will be used.
>> E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64'
> To my eye, this looks as if something is telling apt that version
> 0.4.8-1 is available somewhere, and the upgrade session is deciding that
> it needs to install that version, but then none of the configured
> sources include that version (and it's not already cached locally).
>
> What do
>
> $ apt-cache policy brscan4
> $ apt-cache rdepends brscan4
>
> say?
>
Thank you for your reply.
comp@AbNormal:~$ apt-cache policy brscan4
brscan4:
Installed: 0.4.8-1
Candidate: 0.4.8-1
Version table:
*** 0.4.8-1 100
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
comp@AbNormal:~$ apt-cache rdepends
E: No packages found
Suggestions?
--
Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D.
www.molecular-modeling.net
614.312.7528 (c)
Skype: smolnar1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-26 12:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ATfjs-3H9-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #227388 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 2020-09-26 at 05:18, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > On 09/25/2020 08:53 PM, The Wanderer wrote: > >> On 2020-09-25 at 07:48, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: >>> This morning this resulted in the error >>> >>> The following partially installed packages will be configured: I somehow managed to miss noticing this line before. I think it may be the key to resolving the issue; see below. >>> brscan4 >> As I think at least one other person has noted, this does not appear to >> be available in the Debian archives, at least not as far as I've managed >> to determine. > > That's correct. It is pat of the Brother Laser Printer driver package. Where did that come from? Did it (ever) have a repository configured, or was it downloaded as a standalone .deb? >>> No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed. >>> 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. >>> E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64' >>> After unpacking 0 B will be used. >>> E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64' >> To my eye, this looks as if something is telling apt that version >> 0.4.8-1 is available somewhere, and the upgrade session is deciding that >> it needs to install that version, but then none of the configured >> sources include that version (and it's not already cached locally). >> >> What do >> >> $ apt-cache policy brscan4 >> $ apt-cache rdepends brscan4 >> >> say? >> > Thank you for your reply. > > comp@AbNormal:~$ apt-cache policy brscan4 > brscan4: > Installed: 0.4.8-1 > Candidate: 0.4.8-1 > Version table: > *** 0.4.8-1 100 > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status That confirms (as I suppose was presumable) that there are no sources for *any* version of brscan4 in any configured repository. > comp@AbNormal:~$ apt-cache rdepends > E: No packages found Did you leave off the package name from this command? > Suggestions? I think we still don't have enough information to be sure of what's going on, but... Do you still have the .deb for brscan4 0.4.8-1 around? If so, you could try any or all of: * Reinstall it with 'dpkg -i /path/to/brscan4_0.4.8-1.deb'. That should trigger the package to be configured automatically, and with that configuration complete, apt should theoretically no longer think that it needs to do anything with this package and therefore no longer see any need to download it. * Copy that .deb into /var/cache/apt/archives/ (if it's not already there), so that apt might notice that it doesn't need to download it because there's already a local copy. (This might need some other command to be run in between, but I couldn't say what just offhand.) * Uninstall brscan4, run the upgrade, then install it again via the same reinstall command as suggested above. That both would let you proceed with whatever other package upgrades there might be, and should resolve the half-configured status. -- The Wanderer The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-26 12:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ATfCO-3NP-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #227389 |
On 09/26/2020 06:06 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2020-09-26 at 05:18, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
>
>> On 09/25/2020 08:53 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
>>
>>> On 2020-09-25 at 07:48, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
>>>> This morning this resulted in the error
>>>>
>>>> The following partially installed packages will be configured:
> I somehow managed to miss noticing this line before. I think it may be
> the key to resolving the issue; see below.
>
>>>> brscan4
>>> As I think at least one other person has noted, this does not appear to
>>> be available in the Debian archives, at least not as far as I've managed
>>> to determine.
>> That's correct. It is pat of the Brother Laser Printer driver package.
> Where did that come from? Did it (ever) have a repository configured, or
> was it downloaded as a standalone .deb?
>
>>>> No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
>>>> 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
>>>> E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64'
>>>> After unpacking 0 B will be used.
>>>> E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64'
>>> To my eye, this looks as if something is telling apt that version
>>> 0.4.8-1 is available somewhere, and the upgrade session is deciding that
>>> it needs to install that version, but then none of the configured
>>> sources include that version (and it's not already cached locally).
>>>
>>> What do
>>>
>>> $ apt-cache policy brscan4
>>> $ apt-cache rdepends brscan4
>>>
>>> say?
>>>
>> Thank you for your reply.
>>
>> comp@AbNormal:~$ apt-cache policy brscan4
>> brscan4:
>> Installed: 0.4.8-1
>> Candidate: 0.4.8-1
>> Version table:
>> *** 0.4.8-1 100
>> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> That confirms (as I suppose was presumable) that there are no sources
> for *any* version of brscan4 in any configured repository.
>
>> comp@AbNormal:~$ apt-cache rdepends
>> E: No packages found
> Did you leave off the package name from this command?
>
>> Suggestions?
> I think we still don't have enough information to be sure of what's
> going on, but...
>
> Do you still have the .deb for brscan4 0.4.8-1 around?
>
> If so, you could try any or all of:
>
> * Reinstall it with 'dpkg -i /path/to/brscan4_0.4.8-1.deb'. That should
> trigger the package to be configured automatically, and with that
> configuration complete, apt should theoretically no longer think that it
> needs to do anything with this package and therefore no longer see any
> need to download it.
>
> * Copy that .deb into /var/cache/apt/archives/ (if it's not already
> there), so that apt might notice that it doesn't need to download it
> because there's already a local copy. (This might need some other
> command to be run in between, but I couldn't say what just offhand.)
>
> * Uninstall brscan4, run the upgrade, then install it again via the same
> reinstall command as suggested above. That both would let you proceed
> with whatever other package upgrades there might be, and should resolve
> the half-configured status.
>
Thank you for your suggestions.
You're correct, I did omit the file make.. Here's what happens:
comp@AbNormal:~$ apt-cache policy brscan4
brscan4:
Installed: 0.4.8-1
Candidate: 0.4.8-1
Version table:
*** 0.4.8-1 100
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
comp@AbNormal:~$ apt-cache rdepends brscan4
brscan4
I have some other commitments today, but will try your suggestions as
soon as possible.
Reverse Depends:
--
Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D.
www.molecular-modeling.net
614.312.7528 (c)
Skype: smolnar1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-27 13:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ATDc5-Y1-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #227389 |
On 09/26/2020 06:06 AM, The Wanderer wrote: > On 2020-09-26 at 05:18, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > >> On 09/25/2020 08:53 PM, The Wanderer wrote: >> >>> On 2020-09-25 at 07:48, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: >>>> This morning this resulted in the error >>>> >>>> The following partially installed packages will be configured: > I somehow managed to miss noticing this line before. I think it may be > the key to resolving the issue; see below. > >>>> brscan4 >>> As I think at least one other person has noted, this does not appear to >>> be available in the Debian archives, at least not as far as I've managed >>> to determine. >> That's correct. It is pat of the Brother Laser Printer driver package. > Where did that come from? Did it (ever) have a repository configured, or > was it downloaded as a standalone .deb? > >>>> No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed. >>>> 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. >>>> E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64' >>>> After unpacking 0 B will be used. >>>> E: Can't find a source to download version '0.4.8-1' of 'brscan4:amd64' >>> To my eye, this looks as if something is telling apt that version >>> 0.4.8-1 is available somewhere, and the upgrade session is deciding that >>> it needs to install that version, but then none of the configured >>> sources include that version (and it's not already cached locally). >>> >>> What do >>> >>> $ apt-cache policy brscan4 >>> $ apt-cache rdepends brscan4 >>> >>> say? >>> >> Thank you for your reply. >> >> comp@AbNormal:~$ apt-cache policy brscan4 >> brscan4: >> Installed: 0.4.8-1 >> Candidate: 0.4.8-1 >> Version table: >> *** 0.4.8-1 100 >> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > That confirms (as I suppose was presumable) that there are no sources > for *any* version of brscan4 in any configured repository. > >> comp@AbNormal:~$ apt-cache rdepends >> E: No packages found > Did you leave off the package name from this command? > >> Suggestions? > I think we still don't have enough information to be sure of what's > going on, but... > > Do you still have the .deb for brscan4 0.4.8-1 around? > > If so, you could try any or all of: > > * Reinstall it with 'dpkg -i /path/to/brscan4_0.4.8-1.deb'. That should > trigger the package to be configured automatically, and with that > configuration complete, apt should theoretically no longer think that it > needs to do anything with this package and therefore no longer see any > need to download it. comp@AbNormal:~/Downloads/Brother$ sudo dpkg -i brscan4-0.4.8-1.amd64.deb (Reading database ... 421150 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack brscan4-0.4.8-1.amd64.deb ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/brscan4.prerm: 3: /var/lib/dpkg/info/brscan4.prerm: /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/setupSaneScan4: not found /var/lib/dpkg/info/brscan4.prerm: 4: /var/lib/dpkg/info/brscan4.prerm: /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/udev_uninstall.sh: not found rm: cannot remove '/opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/udev_uninstall.sh': No such file or directory dpkg: warning: old brscan4 package pre-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1 dpkg: trying script from the new package instead ... /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/prerm: 3: /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/prerm: /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/setupSaneScan4: not found /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/prerm: 4: /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/prerm: /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/udev_uninstall.sh: not found rm: cannot remove '/opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/udev_uninstall.sh': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing archive brscan4-0.4.8-1.amd64.deb (--install): new brscan4 package pre-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1 This software is based in part on the work of the Independent JPEG Group. /var/lib/dpkg/info/brscan4.postinst: 18: /var/lib/dpkg/info/brscan4.postinst: /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/setupSaneScan4: not found /var/lib/dpkg/info/brscan4.postinst: 19: /var/lib/dpkg/info/brscan4.postinst: /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/udev_config.sh: not found dpkg: error while cleaning up: installed brscan4 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 127 Errors were encountered while processing: brscan4-0.4.8-1.amd64.deb comp@AbNormal:~/Downloads/Brother$ > > * Copy that .deb into /var/cache/apt/archives/ (if it's not already > there), so that apt might notice that it doesn't need to download it > because there's already a local copy. (This might need some other > command to be run in between, but I couldn't say what just offhand.) I had already copied the .deb to that location. > * Uninstall brscan4, run the upgrade, then install it again via the same > reinstall command as suggested above. That both would let you proceed > with whatever other package upgrades there might be, and should resolve > the half-configured status. > comp@AbNormal:~/Downloads/Brother$ sudo ./uninstaller_brscan4 [sudo] password for comp: dpkg: error processing package brscan4 (--purge): package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting a removal Errors were encountered while processing: brscan4 rm: cannot remove '/etc/udev/rules.d/60-brother-libsane-type1-inst.rules': No such file or directory -- Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D. www.molecular-modeling.net 614.312.7528 (c) Skype: smolnar1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-27 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ATEUx-22c-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #227413 |
On Sun 27 Sep 2020 at 07:32:20 -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/setupSaneScan4: not found > /var/lib/dpkg/info/brscan4.postinst: 19: > /var/lib/dpkg/info/brscan4.postinst: > /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/udev_config.sh: not found You have checked whether tose files exist or not? ls -l /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/setupSaneScan4 ls -l /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/udev_config.sh If not, you can cheat by extracting them from the the deb package, putting them where they are looked for and then running apt purge brscan4 -- Brian.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-27 17:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ATGtj-33l-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #227418 |
On 09/27/2020 09:21 AM, Brian wrote: > On Sun 27 Sep 2020 at 07:32:20 -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > >> /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/setupSaneScan4: not found >> /var/lib/dpkg/info/brscan4.postinst: 19: >> /var/lib/dpkg/info/brscan4.postinst: >> /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/udev_config.sh: not found > You have checked whether tose files exist or not? > > ls -l /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/setupSaneScan4 > ls -l /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/udev_config.sh > > If not, you can cheat by extracting them from the the deb package, > putting them where they are looked for and then running > > apt purge brscan4 > Thank you for your response. Both files were missing. I followed your suggestion, extracted the deb and copied the files to /opt/brother/scanner. However, sudo apt purge brscan4 I got: comp@AbNormal:~/Downloads/Brother/tmp$ sudo apt purge brscan4 [sudo] password for comp: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: The package brscan4 needs to be reinstalled, but I can't find an archive for it. -- Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D. www.molecular-modeling.net 614.312.7528 (c) Skype: smolnar1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-27 17:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ATGWm-3cT-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #227421 |
On Sun 27 Sep 2020 at 11:01:42 -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > > > On 09/27/2020 09:21 AM, Brian wrote: > > On Sun 27 Sep 2020 at 07:32:20 -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > > > > > /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/setupSaneScan4: not found > > > /var/lib/dpkg/info/brscan4.postinst: 19: > > > /var/lib/dpkg/info/brscan4.postinst: > > > /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/udev_config.sh: not found > > You have checked whether tose files exist or not? > > > > ls -l /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/setupSaneScan4 > > ls -l /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/udev_config.sh > > > > If not, you can cheat by extracting them from the the deb package, > > putting them where they are looked for and then running > > > > apt purge brscan4 > > > Thank you for your response. > > Both files were missing. > > > I followed your suggestion, extracted the deb and copied the files to > /opt/brother/scanner. However, sudo apt purge brscan4 I got: We hope you meant /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4. You can also use 'dpkg -P brscan4' instead of the apt command. Not that should make any difference to the outcome. -- Brian.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-27 18:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ATI26-3Q4-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #227421 |
On Sun 27 Sep 2020 at 11:01:42 -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote:
> I followed your suggestion, extracted the deb and copied the files to
> /opt/brother/scanner. However, sudo apt purge brscan4 I got:
>
> comp@AbNormal:~/Downloads/Brother/tmp$ sudo apt purge brscan4
> [sudo] password for comp:
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> E: The package brscan4 needs to be reinstalled, but I can't find an archive
> for it.
Let's assume /opt/brother/scanner is a typo and have a glance at
dpkg(1).
reinstreq
A package marked reinstreq is broken and requires reinstallation.
These packages cannot be removed, unless forced with option
--force-remove-reinstreq.
And later in the manual:
remove-reinstreq: Remove a package, even if it's broken and marked to
require reinstallation. This may, for example, cause parts of the
package to remain on the system, which will then be forgotten by dpkg.
We could try removing the reinstall request status from the package with
sudo dpkg --remove --force-remove-reinstreq brscan4
and then have a go at
sudo dpkg -P brscan4
--
Brian.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-27 19:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ATIlr-4d3-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #227423 |
On 09/27/2020 12:44 PM, Brian wrote: > On Sun 27 Sep 2020 at 11:01:42 -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > >> I followed your suggestion, extracted the deb and copied the files to >> /opt/brother/scanner. However, sudo apt purge brscan4 I got: >> >> comp@AbNormal:~/Downloads/Brother/tmp$ sudo apt purge brscan4 >> [sudo] password for comp: >> Reading package lists... Done >> Building dependency tree >> Reading state information... Done >> E: The package brscan4 needs to be reinstalled, but I can't find an archive >> for it. > Let's assume /opt/brother/scanner is a typo and have a glance at > dpkg(1). > > reinstreq > A package marked reinstreq is broken and requires reinstallation. > These packages cannot be removed, unless forced with option > --force-remove-reinstreq. > > And later in the manual: > > remove-reinstreq: Remove a package, even if it's broken and marked to > require reinstallation. This may, for example, cause parts of the > package to remain on the system, which will then be forgotten by dpkg. > > We could try removing the reinstall request status from the package with > > sudo dpkg --remove --force-remove-reinstreq brscan4 > > and then have a go at > > sudo dpkg -P brscan4 > Halla...bloody...ulla! It worked!! sudo apt update and sudo apt upgrade worked without a burp or any warnings or errors. If you ever need any molecular modeling done give me a hollar. That I can do without nearly as many problems. -- Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D. www.molecular-modeling.net 614.312.7528 (c) Skype: smolnar1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-09-27 19:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ATIOu-4mq-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #227424 |
On Sun 27 Sep 2020 at 13:09:02 -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > > > On 09/27/2020 12:44 PM, Brian wrote: > > On Sun 27 Sep 2020 at 11:01:42 -0400, Stephen P. Molnar wrote: > > > > > I followed your suggestion, extracted the deb and copied the files to > > > /opt/brother/scanner. However, sudo apt purge brscan4 I got: > > > > > > comp@AbNormal:~/Downloads/Brother/tmp$ sudo apt purge brscan4 > > > [sudo] password for comp: > > > Reading package lists... Done > > > Building dependency tree > > > Reading state information... Done > > > E: The package brscan4 needs to be reinstalled, but I can't find an archive > > > for it. > > Let's assume /opt/brother/scanner is a typo and have a glance at > > dpkg(1). > > > > reinstreq > > A package marked reinstreq is broken and requires reinstallation. > > These packages cannot be removed, unless forced with option > > --force-remove-reinstreq. > > > > And later in the manual: > > > > remove-reinstreq: Remove a package, even if it's broken and marked to > > require reinstallation. This may, for example, cause parts of the > > package to remain on the system, which will then be forgotten by dpkg. > > > > We could try removing the reinstall request status from the package with > > > > sudo dpkg --remove --force-remove-reinstreq brscan4 > > > > and then have a go at > > > > sudo dpkg -P brscan4 > > > Halla...bloody...ulla! It worked!! Splendid! > sudo apt update and sudo apt upgrade worked without a burp or any warnings > or errors. > > If you ever need any molecular modeling done give me a hollar. That I can do > without nearly as many problems. Npthing to do with your issue, but what is your Brother model? -- Brian.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 2 [1] 2 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.user
csiph-web