Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #206336
| From | Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Printer pull half of a second blank page after the first printed page and stops |
| Date | 2019-03-18 22:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <xD7wt-6he-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <xCIRu-7vR-43@gated-at.bofh.it> <xCXns-9M-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <xD6h4-5yo-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <xD7mN-6dM-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue 19 Mar 2019 at 01:45:20 +0500, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote: > On 19.03.2019 0:38, Brian wrote: > > The advice is good but is there a good reason to advocate installing > > hplip from source rather than from the stretch package? > > > I didn't advocated per se the installation of upstream package, the > point was to tell OP of it's existence, among the other things. > As I stated before, I never used hplip myself, but it's good to know it > is already in official repositories. You could have checked beforehand. > > $ rmadison -s stretch,stretch-backports hplip > hplip | 3.16.11+repack0-3 | stable | source, amd64, > arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x > hplip | 3.18.12+dfsg0-2~bpo9+1 | stretch-backports | source, amd64, > arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x > > I would recommend to install upstream package only if the most recent > version of it is absolutely required and I highly doubt it is required > in this case. You doubt correctlly. > But even then, personally, I'd try to build a backport from source > package available from 'experimental' first, or build from a tarball and > use tools, like 'checkinstall', to make a simple deb package. > Those procedures are right thing to do, but it's for the users to decide > if they are up for the task, because these procedures often require > serious time investment and expertise. Unnecessary. Backports already exist. It's only a matter of checking. -- Brian.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Printer pull half of a second blank page after the first printed page and stops Markos <markos@c2o.pro.br> - 2019-03-17 19:40 +0100
Re: Printer pull half of a second blank page after the first printed page and stops Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> - 2019-03-18 09:30 +0100
Re: Printer pull half of a second blank page after the first printed page and stops "Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com> - 2019-03-18 11:10 +0100
Re: Printer pull half of a second blank page after the first printed page and stops Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2019-03-18 20:40 +0100
Re: Printer pull half of a second blank page after the first printed page and stops "Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com> - 2019-03-18 21:50 +0100
Re: Printer pull half of a second blank page after the first printed page and stops Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2019-03-18 22:00 +0100
Re: Printer pull half of a second blank page after the first printed page and stops "Alexander V. Makartsev" <avbetev@gmail.com> - 2019-03-18 22:10 +0100
Re: Printer pull half of a second blank page after the first printed page and stops Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2019-03-18 23:40 +0100
Re: Printer pull half of a second blank page after the first printed page and stops deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 08:20 +0100
Re: Printer pull half of a second blank page after the first printed page and stops Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-03-19 09:40 +0100
csiph-web