Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #186140
| From | Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: [Multiarch] armhf on arm64 is not working |
| Date | 2017-08-29 18:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ujRIt-4WZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <ujKxj-oP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ujQ9H-3UP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ujQt5-4gm-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <ujQt4-4gm-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <ujRIt-4WZ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi there, On 08/29/2017 06:07 PM, Adam Cecile wrote: > Could be an alternative indeed, but what about the speed compared to > my quad-core i5 with qemu ? I haven't actually tried that specific comparison, but form my experience a Pi tends to be a tiny bit faster in pure CPU performance than qemu on Intel. (But not much.) The RPi3 is also a quad core, so that is similar. YMMV may vary depending on the precise workload though. That said: - It has only 1 GiB of RAM. That might be a problem. - It doesn't have as much cache as an Intel Core CPU, so if you have workloads that require a lot of memory access, that'll probably offset any small advantages in pure CPU performance. - I/O is quite slow. If you compile large things my guess is that just because of I/O it'll take longer on the Pi than with qemu. OTOH, it's cheap, so even if it's not the right thing in the end you're not going to waste a ton of money. You could also first buy just the board and power supply and only buy a case and other accessories once you've verified that it's sufficient for your use case. Then again, there are also other ARM boards in a similar price range out there, which might suit your use case better. But I really am not an expert here, I've just played around with the Pi a bit in the past... Regards, Christian
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [Multiarch] armhf on arm64 is not working Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2017-08-28 23:30 +0200
Re: [Multiarch] armhf on arm64 is not working Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2017-08-28 23:40 +0200
Re: [Multiarch] armhf on arm64 is not working Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 08:30 +0200
Re: [Multiarch] armhf on arm64 is not working Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 11:00 +0200
Re: [Multiarch] armhf on arm64 is not working Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2017-08-29 17:00 +0200
Re: [Multiarch] armhf on arm64 is not working Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2017-08-29 17:20 +0200
Re: [Multiarch] armhf on arm64 is not working Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2017-08-29 18:40 +0200
csiph-web