Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #186114
| From | Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: [Multiarch] armhf on arm64 is not working |
| Date | 2017-08-29 11:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ujKxj-oP-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ujzLA-2eP-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <ujzLA-2eP-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <ujIca-7vX-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <ujIca-7vX-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <ujKxj-oP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi. On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 08:49:40AM +0200, Adam Cecile wrote: > > > I'm actually running arm64, not amd64 ;-) > > My eyes are failing me then ☺. > > > > Can you provide your /proc/cpuinfo then please? > > Sure: > > processor : 0 > BogoMIPS : 200.00 > Features : fp asimd evtstrm aes pmull sha1 sha2 crc32 atomics > CPU implementer : 0x43 > CPU architecture: 8 > CPU variant : 0x1 > CPU part : 0x0a1 > CPU revision : 1 Ok, I got armhf binary running on ARM64, but the only CPU I have access to has 'CPU implementer' 0x41 and a different set of features. Unsure if it matters. So, I'm proposing to start with something more simple - statically linked binaries. Get yourself busybox-static package from armhf and armel. Unpack it with 'dpkg -x', see if either of them works. Reco
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [Multiarch] armhf on arm64 is not working Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2017-08-28 23:30 +0200
Re: [Multiarch] armhf on arm64 is not working Sven Hartge <sven@svenhartge.de> - 2017-08-28 23:40 +0200
Re: [Multiarch] armhf on arm64 is not working Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 08:30 +0200
Re: [Multiarch] armhf on arm64 is not working Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2017-08-29 11:00 +0200
Re: [Multiarch] armhf on arm64 is not working Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2017-08-29 17:00 +0200
Re: [Multiarch] armhf on arm64 is not working Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2017-08-29 17:20 +0200
Re: [Multiarch] armhf on arm64 is not working Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> - 2017-08-29 18:40 +0200
csiph-web