Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #180420
| Path | csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.unit0.net!news.panservice.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. |
| Date | Sun, 23 Apr 2017 19:50:02 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tztO2-37S-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tz653-57Y-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzn5V-7jm-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzpr3-va-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Sun Apr 23 17:41:44 2017 |
| Old-Return-Path | <gheskett@shentel.net> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-6.999 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URI_TRY_3LD=0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -6.1 |
| X-Asg-Debug-ID | 1492969285-097fa229171a84220001-KlT975 |
| X-Barracuda-Envelope-From | gheskett@shentel.net |
| X-Barracuda-Rbl-Trusted-Forwarder | 204.111.2.17 |
| X-Barracuda-Effective-Source-IP | n64s149.fttx.shentel.net[204.111.64.149] |
| X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP | 204.111.64.149 |
| X-Barracuda-Rbl-IP | 204.111.64.149 |
| X-Asg-Orig-Subj | Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. |
| User-Agent | KMail/1.9.10 (enterprise35 0.20100827.1168748) |
| X-Kmail-Quoteprefix | > |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| X-Barracuda-Connect | smtp1.edbg.cloud.shentel.net[204.111.2.17] |
| X-Barracuda-Start-Time | 1492969285 |
| X-Barracuda-URL | https://204.111.1.147:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi |
| X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size | 1661 |
| X-Barracuda-Brts-Status | 1 |
| X-Barracuda-Spam-Score | 0.50 |
| X-Barracuda-Spam-Status | No, SCORE=0.50 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=6.0 tests=WEIRD_PORT |
| X-Barracuda-Spam-Report | Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.38295 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.50 WEIRD_PORT URI: Uses non-standard port number for HTTP |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/720038 |
| List-ID | <debian-user.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/201704231341.24735.gheskett@shentel.net |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 41 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Sun, 23 Apr 2017 13:41:24 -0400 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <201704231341.24735.gheskett@shentel.net> |
| X-Original-References | <201704221224.32435.gheskett@shentel.net> <201704230637.38003.gheskett@shentel.net> <b25439ba-754c-8097-1531-8b6be083b39a@ziggo.nl> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.user:180420 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Sunday 23 April 2017 07:35:36 Frank de Bruijn wrote: > Op 23-04-17 om 12:37 schreef Gene Heskett: > > On Sunday 23 April 2017 01:54:21 Frank wrote: > >> Op 23-04-17 om 06:21 schreef Gene Heskett: > >>> And how do you get that 10 year newer flash? The adobe site > >>> doesn't show me anything newer than the 11.xx.xx.xxx stuff. > >> > >> Really? Both https://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ and > >> https://get.adobe.com/nl/flashplayer/ definitely show 25.0.0.148 > >> for me. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Frank > > > > After writing that, I did a google search, which gave me a slightly > > different adobe url and that link gave me a tarball of 25.0.0.148. > > The installation instructions were a bit confusing, so I wound up > > overwriting libflashplayer.so in 5 locations with this newer > > version. Leftovers from previous attempts to arrive at a working 75% > > of the time flash player. No one, including me, has a clue where > > the one being used actually is. > > I usually look in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins, but the plugin file there > may actually be a symlink pointing to something in /etc/alternatives, > which in turn will probably point to some other item somewhere in > /usr/lib... > > Regards, > Frank The link in /etc/alternatives points at the new version in /usr/lib/flashplayer-mozilla/libflashplayer.so So I think I'm ok. Thank you for reminding me about alternatives. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-04-22 18:30 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2017-04-22 23:40 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-04-23 01:00 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-04-23 05:30 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-04-23 06:30 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Frank <zuiderduin@gmx.com> - 2017-04-23 08:00 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-04-23 12:40 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Frank de Bruijn <frank.de.bruijn@ziggo.nl> - 2017-04-23 15:10 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-04-23 16:00 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-04-23 19:50 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2017-04-23 08:10 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-04-23 11:30 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-04-23 21:20 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-04-23 21:50 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-04-24 00:50 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-04-24 02:40 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-04-24 04:00 +0200
csiph-web