Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #180420

Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

Path csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.unit0.net!news.panservice.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.
Date Sun, 23 Apr 2017 19:50:02 +0200
Message-ID <tztO2-37S-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tz653-57Y-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzn5V-7jm-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzpr3-va-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Sun Apr 23 17:41:44 2017
Old-Return-Path <gheskett@shentel.net>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-6.999 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URI_TRY_3LD=0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -6.1
X-Asg-Debug-ID 1492969285-097fa229171a84220001-KlT975
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From gheskett@shentel.net
X-Barracuda-Rbl-Trusted-Forwarder 204.111.2.17
X-Barracuda-Effective-Source-IP n64s149.fttx.shentel.net[204.111.64.149]
X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP 204.111.64.149
X-Barracuda-Rbl-IP 204.111.64.149
X-Asg-Orig-Subj Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.
User-Agent KMail/1.9.10 (enterprise35 0.20100827.1168748)
X-Kmail-Quoteprefix >
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type Text/Plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Content-Disposition inline
X-Barracuda-Connect smtp1.edbg.cloud.shentel.net[204.111.2.17]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time 1492969285
X-Barracuda-URL https://204.111.1.147:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size 1661
X-Barracuda-Brts-Status 1
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score 0.50
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status No, SCORE=0.50 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=6.0 tests=WEIRD_PORT
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.38295 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.50 WEIRD_PORT URI: Uses non-standard port number for HTTP
X-Mailing-List <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/720038
List-ID <debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/201704231341.24735.gheskett@shentel.net
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 41
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Sun, 23 Apr 2017 13:41:24 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID <201704231341.24735.gheskett@shentel.net>
X-Original-References <201704221224.32435.gheskett@shentel.net> <201704230637.38003.gheskett@shentel.net> <b25439ba-754c-8097-1531-8b6be083b39a@ziggo.nl>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.user:180420

Show key headers only | View raw


On Sunday 23 April 2017 07:35:36 Frank de Bruijn wrote:

> Op 23-04-17 om 12:37 schreef Gene Heskett:
> > On Sunday 23 April 2017 01:54:21 Frank wrote:
> >> Op 23-04-17 om 06:21 schreef Gene Heskett:
> >>> And how do you get that 10 year newer flash?  The adobe site
> >>> doesn't show me anything newer than the 11.xx.xx.xxx stuff.
> >>
> >> Really? Both https://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ and
> >> https://get.adobe.com/nl/flashplayer/ definitely show 25.0.0.148
> >> for me.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Frank
> >
> > After writing that, I did a google search, which gave me a slightly
> > different adobe url and that link gave me a tarball of 25.0.0.148. 
> > The installation instructions were a bit confusing, so I wound up
> > overwriting libflashplayer.so in 5 locations with this newer
> > version. Leftovers from previous attempts to arrive at a working 75%
> > of the time flash player.  No one, including me, has a clue where
> > the one being used actually is.
>
> I usually look in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins, but the plugin file there
> may actually be a symlink pointing to something in /etc/alternatives,
> which in turn will probably point to some other item somewhere in
> /usr/lib...
>
> Regards,
> Frank

The link in /etc/alternatives points at the new version 
in /usr/lib/flashplayer-mozilla/libflashplayer.so

So I think I'm ok.  Thank you for reminding me about alternatives.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-04-22 18:30 +0200
  Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net  today. songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2017-04-22 23:40 +0200
    Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-04-23 01:00 +0200
  Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net  today. Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-04-23 05:30 +0200
    Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-04-23 06:30 +0200
      Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net  today. Frank <zuiderduin@gmx.com> - 2017-04-23 08:00 +0200
        Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-04-23 12:40 +0200
          Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net  today. Frank de Bruijn <frank.de.bruijn@ziggo.nl> - 2017-04-23 15:10 +0200
            Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net  today. Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-04-23 16:00 +0200
            Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-04-23 19:50 +0200
      Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net  today. Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2017-04-23 08:10 +0200
      Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net  today. Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-04-23 11:30 +0200
      Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net  today. Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-04-23 21:20 +0200
        Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-04-23 21:50 +0200
          Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net  today. Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-04-24 00:50 +0200
            Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net  today. David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-04-24 02:40 +0200
              Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net  today. Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-04-24 04:00 +0200

csiph-web