Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #180418
| From | Frank de Bruijn <frank.de.bruijn@ziggo.nl> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. |
| Date | 2017-04-23 15:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tzpr3-va-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tz653-57Y-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzhjQ-3Gd-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tziIV-4of-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzn5V-7jm-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Op 23-04-17 om 12:37 schreef Gene Heskett: > On Sunday 23 April 2017 01:54:21 Frank wrote: > >> Op 23-04-17 om 06:21 schreef Gene Heskett: >>> And how do you get that 10 year newer flash? The adobe site doesn't >>> show me anything newer than the 11.xx.xx.xxx stuff. >> >> Really? Both https://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ and >> https://get.adobe.com/nl/flashplayer/ definitely show 25.0.0.148 for >> me. >> >> Regards, >> Frank > > After writing that, I did a google search, which gave me a slightly > different adobe url and that link gave me a tarball of 25.0.0.148. The > installation instructions were a bit confusing, so I wound up > overwriting libflashplayer.so in 5 locations with this newer version. > Leftovers from previous attempts to arrive at a working 75% of the time > flash player. No one, including me, has a clue where the one being used > actually is. I usually look in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins, but the plugin file there may actually be a symlink pointing to something in /etc/alternatives, which in turn will probably point to some other item somewhere in /usr/lib... Regards, Frank
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-04-22 18:30 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2017-04-22 23:40 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-04-23 01:00 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-04-23 05:30 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-04-23 06:30 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Frank <zuiderduin@gmx.com> - 2017-04-23 08:00 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-04-23 12:40 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Frank de Bruijn <frank.de.bruijn@ziggo.nl> - 2017-04-23 15:10 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-04-23 16:00 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-04-23 19:50 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2017-04-23 08:10 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2017-04-23 11:30 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-04-23 21:20 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2017-04-23 21:50 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-04-24 00:50 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2017-04-24 02:40 +0200
Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today. Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2017-04-24 04:00 +0200
csiph-web