Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #174663

Re: iptables question

Show all headers | View raw

Pascal Hambourg wrote:

> Le 13/11/2016 à 16:05, deloptes a écrit :
>>
>> These are the rules - a friend created this like 10y ago. I added few
>> rules to forward ports from outside to the intranet and to be able to
>> handle VPN.
>> You can ignore  192.168.60.1 on eth2 - not used.
> 
> IMO, this ruleset is totally insane.
> 

Haha, yes for me it is also hard to understand it all ... but as I said in
the past 10y it did a good work.

> However, after clearing out all irrelevant rules, I see nothing in what
> is left which may block connections from 192.168.40.0/24 on eth1 to
> anywhere through the firewall :
> 
> *nat
> :PREROUTING ACCEPT [26000:2533530]
> :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [87:4966]
> :OUTPUT ACCEPT [28:2038]
> -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.40.0/24 -o eth0 -j SNAT --to-source 10.0.0.1
> COMMIT
> *filter
> :INPUT DROP [0:0]
> :FORWARD DROP [0:0]
> :OUTPUT DROP [0:0]
> :ifilter - [0:0]
> :ofilter - [0:0]
> -A INPUT -j ifilter
> -A FORWARD -j ifilter
> -A FORWARD -j ofilter
> -A OUTPUT -j ofilter
> -A ifilter -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
> -A ifilter -i eth1 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
> 
> What happens exactly when your try to connect ? What is the command,
> what is the reply ? Did you make a packet capture on eth0 ?
> 

I do ssh user@10...6 and nothing happens - connection time out after ~1min

> Did you check the routing table on the firewall and the targets ? Do
> they have a route to all the 10.0.0.0/24 range ?
> 

the one I posted is on the firewall - firewall is the one I am trying to
modify.
I am not sure that I have a rule to all the 10.0.0.0/24 range, but even if I
replace 10.0.0.1/32 with 10.0.0.0/24 it does not work

>> Another important information perhaps is that the modem is configured to
>> have a DMZ with 10.0.0.1.
> 
> I don't think this is relevant. The modem is not involved.
> 

The modem is a wireless modem so the cable goes to the firewall 10..1 and
via the wlan I have 10..6 etc. So IMO it is involved, but I do not have
root on it - I have only the admin iface and there I see firewall is active
and setup in normal mode (you have easy and hard - translated from the
local language)

>> Devices 10.0.0.6 and 10.0.0.7 which I want to connect from 192.... do not
>> have any firewalls - they are mobile phones.
>>
>> I will really appreciate your help - perhaps reviewing the rules and
>> suggesting improvements as well.
> 
> This ruleset does not need improvements but a total rewrite.

Yes I was thinking the same, I'll put it on the TODO. I even tried once with
fw builder - it couldn't even import properly, because import and export
produced not working firewall.
IT is a bit complicated. However I think the ruleset is not that bad as
testing from outside shows the network 192.168... is well protected

thanks

regards

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

iptables question deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 22:20 +0100
  Re: iptables question Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2016-11-12 23:40 +0100
    Re: iptables question deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 01:30 +0100
      Re: iptables question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-11-13 10:50 +0100
      Re: iptables question Michael Milliman <michael.e.milliman@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 12:40 +0100
        Re: iptables question deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 16:10 +0100
          Re: iptables question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-11-13 18:00 +0100
            Re: iptables question deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 20:50 +0100
              Re: iptables question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-11-13 21:20 +0100
                Re: iptables question deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 21:50 +0100
                Re: iptables question Henning <henning@itcfollmann.com> - 2016-11-13 22:50 +0100
                Re: iptables question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-11-13 23:30 +0100
                Re: iptables question Henning <henning@itcfollmann.com> - 2016-11-14 00:30 +0100
                Re: iptables question deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 00:50 +0100
                Re: iptables question Henning Follmann <hfollmann@itcfollmann.com> - 2016-11-14 13:10 +0100
                Re: iptables question deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 20:20 +0100
                Re: iptables question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-11-13 23:30 +0100
                Re: iptables question deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 01:00 +0100
                Re: iptables question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-11-14 23:10 +0100
      Re: iptables question Igor Cicimov <icicimov@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 03:10 +0100
        Re: iptables question deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 08:20 +0100
          Re: iptables question deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 09:10 +0100
    Re: iptables question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-11-13 10:40 +0100
      Re: iptables question Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2016-11-13 11:10 +0100
        Re: iptables question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-11-13 11:40 +0100
          Re: iptables question Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2016-11-13 13:40 +0100
            Re: iptables question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-11-13 15:00 +0100
              Re: iptables question Igor Cicimov <icicimov@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 03:00 +0100

csiph-web