Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #174659
| From | Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: iptables question |
| Date | 2016-11-13 18:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sD6im-2Rf-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sCNSp-7BL-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <sCP7P-8pY-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sCQQn-18E-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sD1iG-82r-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <sD4zU-1Tt-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Le 13/11/2016 à 16:05, deloptes a écrit : > > These are the rules - a friend created this like 10y ago. I added few rules > to forward ports from outside to the intranet and to be able to handle VPN. > You can ignore 192.168.60.1 on eth2 - not used. IMO, this ruleset is totally insane. However, after clearing out all irrelevant rules, I see nothing in what is left which may block connections from 192.168.40.0/24 on eth1 to anywhere through the firewall : *nat :PREROUTING ACCEPT [26000:2533530] :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [87:4966] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [28:2038] -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.40.0/24 -o eth0 -j SNAT --to-source 10.0.0.1 COMMIT *filter :INPUT DROP [0:0] :FORWARD DROP [0:0] :OUTPUT DROP [0:0] :ifilter - [0:0] :ofilter - [0:0] -A INPUT -j ifilter -A FORWARD -j ifilter -A FORWARD -j ofilter -A OUTPUT -j ofilter -A ifilter -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A ifilter -i eth1 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT What happens exactly when your try to connect ? What is the command, what is the reply ? Did you make a packet capture on eth0 ? Did you check the routing table on the firewall and the targets ? Do they have a route to all the 10.0.0.0/24 range ? > Another important information perhaps is that the modem is configured to > have a DMZ with 10.0.0.1. I don't think this is relevant. The modem is not involved. > Devices 10.0.0.6 and 10.0.0.7 which I want to connect from 192.... do not > have any firewalls - they are mobile phones. > > I will really appreciate your help - perhaps reviewing the rules and > suggesting improvements as well. This ruleset does not need improvements but a total rewrite.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
iptables question deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 22:20 +0100
Re: iptables question Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2016-11-12 23:40 +0100
Re: iptables question deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 01:30 +0100
Re: iptables question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-11-13 10:50 +0100
Re: iptables question Michael Milliman <michael.e.milliman@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 12:40 +0100
Re: iptables question deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 16:10 +0100
Re: iptables question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-11-13 18:00 +0100
Re: iptables question deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 20:50 +0100
Re: iptables question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-11-13 21:20 +0100
Re: iptables question deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 21:50 +0100
Re: iptables question Henning <henning@itcfollmann.com> - 2016-11-13 22:50 +0100
Re: iptables question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-11-13 23:30 +0100
Re: iptables question Henning <henning@itcfollmann.com> - 2016-11-14 00:30 +0100
Re: iptables question deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 00:50 +0100
Re: iptables question Henning Follmann <hfollmann@itcfollmann.com> - 2016-11-14 13:10 +0100
Re: iptables question deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 20:20 +0100
Re: iptables question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-11-13 23:30 +0100
Re: iptables question deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 01:00 +0100
Re: iptables question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-11-14 23:10 +0100
Re: iptables question Igor Cicimov <icicimov@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 03:10 +0100
Re: iptables question deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 08:20 +0100
Re: iptables question deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 09:10 +0100
Re: iptables question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-11-13 10:40 +0100
Re: iptables question Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2016-11-13 11:10 +0100
Re: iptables question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-11-13 11:40 +0100
Re: iptables question Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2016-11-13 13:40 +0100
Re: iptables question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-11-13 15:00 +0100
Re: iptables question Igor Cicimov <icicimov@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 03:00 +0100
csiph-web