Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #165437
| From | Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: flash? [OT] |
| Date | 2016-03-15 21:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rd3BE-77u-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <rcG2m-7Z0-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <rcGOK-8hS-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rcN3Q-459-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rcNdw-49L-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rcOjg-4Vr-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue 15 Mar 2016 at 14:51:13 +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote: > On 15/03/2016 1:47 PM, David Wright wrote: > >> Nothing would ever happen if everyone adopted the logic of "oh well, I'm > >> alone so I can't change anything". The journey of a thousand miles > >> starts with a single step. > >> > >>> Does it even notice you didn't even visit its site? "By God", they > >>> say, Brian didn't watch Happy Valley; why not?; we must do something > >>> about this. > >> > >> They will notice when lots of people no longer use Flash, and we will > >> force them to react accordingly. > > > > Please stop trolling on this list. > > Oh come on. > > Flash is on it's last legs; even Adobe is moving away from it. So that is the writing on the wall? All Adobe's server products are out of the window? No more flash products on SMART TVs? Adobe is moving to some other technology? Citation, please. > > Every computer that stops using flash will mean some websites will lose > traffic; if they lose enough, then they /may/ change or they may die > along with flash. The first statement is bloody obvious. The second is conjecture based on your idea that flash is dead (or soon will be).
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
flash? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-14 17:30 +0100
Re: flash? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-14 17:30 +0100
Re: flash? Alex Mestiashvili <mailatgoogl@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 18:00 +0100
Re: flash? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-14 19:10 +0100
Re: flash? Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 18:50 +0100
Re: flash? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 19:00 +0100
Re: flash? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-14 19:20 +0100
Re: flash? "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@galactic.demon.co.uk> - 2016-03-14 22:40 +0100
Re: flash? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 00:20 +0100
Re: flash? "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@galactic.demon.co.uk> - 2016-03-15 00:50 +0100
Re: flash? Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 00:20 +0100
Re: flash? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-15 02:50 +0100
Re: flash? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-14 19:10 +0100
Re: flash? Charlie Kravetz <cjk@teamcharliesangels.com> - 2016-03-14 19:50 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Jörg-Volker Peetz <jvpeetz@web.de> - 2016-03-14 19:10 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2016-03-14 19:20 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2016-03-14 20:10 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-03-14 21:00 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Adam Wilson <moxalt@riseup.net> - 2016-03-15 03:40 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2016-03-15 03:50 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Adam Wilson <moxalt@riseup.net> - 2016-03-15 04:50 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2016-03-15 05:00 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 10:00 +0100
"A Modest Proposal" - was [Re: flash? [OT]] Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-03-15 11:40 +0100
Re: "A Modest Proposal" - was [Re: flash? [OT]] deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 15:20 +0100
Re: "A Modest Proposal" - was [Re: flash? [OT]] Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-03-15 16:00 +0100
Re: "A Modest Proposal" - was [Re: flash? [OT]] Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 17:50 +0100
Re: "A Modest Proposal" - was [Re: flash? [OT]] Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2016-03-16 01:50 +0100
Re: "A Modest Proposal" - was [Re: flash? [OT]] Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 02:50 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-03-15 21:00 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 02:50 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 14:00 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 15:00 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 16:20 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 16:50 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 17:30 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 23:40 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-03-15 21:20 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 22:10 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Adam Wilson <moxalt@riseup.net> - 2016-03-17 17:10 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 17:40 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Adam Wilson <moxalt@riseup.net> - 2016-03-17 17:50 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2016-03-17 19:10 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Adam Wilson <moxalt@riseup.net> - 2016-03-15 03:40 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 21:20 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-03-14 21:30 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 22:00 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2016-03-16 00:00 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 05:00 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Adam Wilson <moxalt@riseup.net> - 2016-03-15 03:40 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 08:40 +0100
Re: flash? [OT] Adam Wilson <moxalt@riseup.net> - 2016-03-17 17:10 +0100
csiph-web