Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #163379

Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now
Date Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:00:01 +0100
Message-ID <qToSl-6CC-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qQWxb-3FW-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qQYpk-56C-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qR1Gy-7or-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qRaqu-5f3-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <qReDN-84a-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <qRf6P-5r-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <qRfgw-8O-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSDTs-7Wg-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qSGRj-1sS-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qT19o-78z-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qT4TF-1oo-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Alberto Salvia Novella <es20490446e@gmail.com>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Thu Jan 21 14:58:55 2016
Old-Return-Path <joel.rees@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-5.799 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .gmail. - helo: .mail-ig0-x232.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -7
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=yvmPulUGejaqk8pJXnjnTeAQk5XIvSGSdjZgT+uNCLg=; b=X7i76VVpdU8BHoP9RM0xOrDl1p8TakLxIHqp3aaxpdzhVgIw2YuBu7FAWcYhAkyabI iEXS1LvkDU9Rpld85wcwvAePEpbhlVPQDhPeoWnmD0Q9gj7w7vo42gtr9xr9cuDc8+e5 m8huAARj03lG+BP64IY5IUO3WKEFmN/LJVK+EhV+Y5sbUpngHZp8FELtv1lE30SoAP+b rxZpzJ9o4GtivLn+Wv61PJV0vncV6N9cN0sYwd9nqI6NHDigk/a3HzuP8L6yOgJJ7aI7 I4wKsbCXfKSYhKPa5zLQrN+ochfractV+1tV2vNuEHNYB8U8/iUZHUG33XWKQPC6cmrB mQ+A==
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=yvmPulUGejaqk8pJXnjnTeAQk5XIvSGSdjZgT+uNCLg=; b=c2r2QiwzragbN8+yc4pnwCSVZjbjlBo05nsc2hJ1O1HTooc7c0K0w6xXt/nCw2WB4E wzCo0Rr8vWsPJQ+dbIdjQUbCNDh+uWv3oNoCPrwhqMuBZaVsxDw5Q6ao6cx4BnYn6PcI 0P1jrnw3yH573hs93xadXvAjIgYsfb8kdF9qLrqn1+h6/Re7VAp15e2jpayQj3cPKOWI 5cPbSt/jRbfjjPeHZygCYBo+BYOUjD7VbRoDY0gTfaZMR3uzMh0WY7zOJmWcJuPTk5qK 0RcPvEl/Tk6blw36v0v5ZJJQ1blWTjWP6ZNEUIOERR8ob5L4Pb426x5k5+qCw9M9YAZu GeHw==
X-Gm-Message-State AG10YORfFQyPLCX3nc7/J5TSmFpyg3sJTUfLmwVu4LQ+EjLrZWIzoXGZJlwNWL0GlsCqf6SFkbadhP2AhuRrAw==
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Received by 10.50.41.65 with SMTP id d1mr9381442igl.44.1453388318598; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 06:58:38 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01183b70736f080529d95643
X-Mailing-List <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/702858
List-ID <debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAAr43iNnfs1Nwou78v3_AYecd=GhMJx9r=WXS7ZZ6mvL+xvGrw@mail.gmail.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 141
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date Thu, 21 Jan 2016 23:58:38 +0900
X-Original-Message-ID <CAAr43iNnfs1Nwou78v3_AYecd=GhMJx9r=WXS7ZZ6mvL+xvGrw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-References <56980107.3050403@gmail.com> <56981CF3.9070407@riseup.net> <CAJbZA21MTwkRxaLCbhjK86w3JBMjW922hkUoHieSpf+S+MCwOw@mail.gmail.com> <5698D0F0.9030901@riseup.net> <569911C3.6070706@gmail.com> <569914CA.90408@riseup.net> <56991B54.6060304@gmail.com> <CAAr43iP20=RVdv5Q6JNU6peH1Nb-qcVzHNyHMKMSkfR9dzQ=8Q@mail.gmail.com> <569E5C62.2040508@gmail.com> <CAAr43iPVk3mtHtNYg8HmqDY0hUycGGHJMAQj_4jLEbOFpy5RXg@mail.gmail.com> <569FC4F4.9030806@gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.user:163379

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

2016/01/21 2:33 "Alberto Salvia Novella" <es20490446e@gmail.com>:
>
> Joel Rees:
>
>> It supports neither your peculiar assertion that microcode is not
>> executable nor your equally peculiar assertion that microcode is not
>> and has not been a cause for concern.
>
>
> Polynomial (http://tinyurl.com/hdtpa7g):

You know, a url contains useful information in and of itself. I appreciate
that urls get long and code points out of the basic plane make them hard to
read and encoded server internal indexing really isn't interesting, but at
least it would tell us in this case that what you are taking out of context
is supposed to be from stackexchange.

> > Let's assume for a moment that you could overwrite microcode in a
> > useful way. How would you make it do anything useful?

The poster you are quoting part of does know somewhat about his topic, but
these two sentences together should cause you to think carefully.

Useful is not useful?

Clearly he is thinking of more than one kind of usefulness.

> > Keep in mind
> > that each code simply shifts some values around in the internals of
> > the hardware, rather than a real operation.

If "simply shifting values around in the internals of the hardware" is not
doing any "real" operation, how would the results of any "real operation"
ever get out of the arithmetic or logic units?

Putting an address on the address bus in-and-of-itself neither reads nor
writes data, but putting an address on the address bus is part of both
reading and writing data.

"Modern" CPUs have plenty of spare register space, most of it undocumented.
Register space can be used to record something of state, allowing
instruction streams to be self-parsing.

How many elements of the stuff that enables malware do you want me to point
out? Sure, you're not going to write a backdoor entirely in microcode, but
you can use rogue updates to slip bits and pieces of microcode in to
instructions that allow a backdoor to run and get around the walls.

And not all rogue updates come from 3rd parties.

Read the links Anders posted.

> Mark Shuttleworth (http://tinyurl.com/pk8zwmv):
> > Declarative firmware that describes hardware linkages and
> > dependencies but doesn’t include executable code is the best chance
> > we have of real bottom-up security.

In some ideal world, you could pre-define all the customizations an
integrator or end-user could want in code that gets shipped in the kernel,
and provide a declarative interface to select the tweaks an integrator or
end-user wants.

>From where I stand, it requires the kernel developers to know an awful lot
more about what every possible thing an end user or integrator might want
than is humanly possible.

--
Joel Rees

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Alberto Salvia Novella <es20490446e@gmail.com> - 2016-01-14 21:20 +0100
  Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now deloptes <deloptes@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-14 22:50 +0100
  Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Zlatan Todoric <zlatan@riseup.net> - 2016-01-14 23:30 +0100
    Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2016-01-15 02:10 +0100
    Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Michael Haney <thezorch@gmail.com> - 2016-01-15 02:50 +0100
      Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Zlatan Todoric <zlatan@riseup.net> - 2016-01-15 12:10 +0100
        Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Alberto Salvia Novella <es20490446e@gmail.com> - 2016-01-15 16:40 +0100
          Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Zlatan Todoric <zlatan@riseup.net> - 2016-01-15 17:10 +0100
            Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Alberto Salvia Novella <es20490446e@gmail.com> - 2016-01-15 17:20 +0100
              Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 13:50 +0100
                Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Alberto Salvia Novella <es20490446e@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 17:00 +0100
                Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Anders Andersson <pipatron@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 17:10 +0100
                Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 14:10 +0100
                Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 14:40 +0100
                Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Alberto Salvia Novella <es20490446e@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 18:40 +0100
                Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 16:00 +0100
                Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Alberto Salvia Novella <es20490446e@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 17:40 +0100
                Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 19:00 +0100
                Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now jdd <jdd@dodin.org> - 2016-01-22 23:20 +0100
                Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 01:30 +0100
                Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 02:20 +0100
                Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-01-23 11:20 +0100
                Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2016-01-24 05:40 +0100
                Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2016-01-24 12:30 +0100
    Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now shawn wilson <ag4ve.us@gmail.com> - 2016-01-15 11:00 +0100
      Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Svante Signell <svante.signell@gmail.com> - 2016-01-15 11:40 +0100
      Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Zlatan Todoric <zlatan@riseup.net> - 2016-01-15 12:10 +0100
    Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2016-01-15 15:10 +0100
      Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Zlatan Todoric <zlatan@riseup.net> - 2016-01-15 15:50 +0100
  Re: Libre graphics could become the standard if we push right now Paul Johnson <baloo@ursamundi.org> - 2016-01-15 10:00 +0100

csiph-web