Re: weird tzdata version numbers

From	Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: weird tzdata version numbers
Date	2024-12-08 20:20 +0100
Message-ID	<JRuYV-eVtI-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<JRuFz-eUFh-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, Dec 08, 2024 at 19:44:49 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> version number for tzdata in bullseye is 2024b-0+deb11u1, but
> for bookworm it is still 2024a-0+deb12u1. This seems weird.
> Shouldn't the bookworm version number be "newer" than the bullseye
> version?

hobbit:~$ apt policy tzdata
tzdata:
  Installed: 2024b-0+deb12u1
  Candidate: 2024b-0+deb12u1
  Version table:
 *** 2024b-0+deb12u1 500
        500 http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-updates/main amd64 Packages
        500 http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-updates/main i386 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     2024a-0+deb12u1 500
        500 http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm/main amd64 Packages
        500 http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm/main i386 Packages

Perhaps you're missing the bookworm-updates source?  It's optional,
but recommended.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

weird tzdata version numbers Harald Dunkel <harri@afaics.de> - 2024-12-08 20:00 +0100
  Re: weird tzdata version numbers Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2024-12-08 20:20 +0100

csiph-web