Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #268954
| From | Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Marking as spam |
| Date | 2024-04-18 18:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <IuCEp-7aMo-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <IudmF-6TWz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <IuBIl-7a8L-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <IuBS1-7adX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <IuCbn-7alP-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 18/04/2024 12:43, Hans wrote: > But the "Sorry" mail I did send without the spam tag. However, I get it WITH > the spamtag, as all mails get the DCIM=false tag in the header (created by the > debian servers) and megamailservers.eu add the ****SPAM**** tag. Or you could use a less shitty mail service, because failed DKIM (I assume that's what you mean by DCIM=false) does not mean that an email is a spam. Conversely, I see a lot of spams that have a valid DKIM signature. Moreover, I don't think the Debian list servers validate DKIM. It's probably your host that is doing so. And finally, your own mails fail DKIM, so for a mail server that seems to give so much importance to DKIM, they could at least set it up right. -- Nothing can be done in one trip. -- Snider Eduardo M KALINOWSKI eduardo@kalinowski.com.br
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
LibreOffice removed from Debian Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2024-04-17 15:20 +0200
Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2024-04-17 15:40 +0200
Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2024-04-17 15:40 +0200
Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2024-04-17 16:20 +0200
Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2024-04-18 04:30 +0200
Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2024-04-17 16:20 +0200
Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian Sarunas Burdulis <sarunas@math.dartmouth.edu> - 2024-04-17 16:00 +0200
Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian Erwan David <erwan@rail.eu.org> - 2024-04-18 10:00 +0200
Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2024-04-18 10:10 +0200
Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2024-04-18 10:30 +0200
Re: *****SPAM***** Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2024-04-18 11:40 +0200
Marking as spam [was: *****SPAM***** Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-04-18 12:00 +0200
Re: *****SPAM***** Marking as spam [was: *****SPAM***** Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian] Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2024-04-18 17:10 +0200
Re: *****SPAM***** Marking as spam [was: *****SPAM***** Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian] Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2024-04-18 17:20 +0200
Re: *****SPAM***** Marking as spam [was: *****SPAM***** Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian] "rtnetzlof@windstream.net" <rtnetzlof@windstream.net> - 2024-04-18 17:30 +0200
Re: *****SPAM***** Marking as spam [was: *****SPAM***** Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian] Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2024-04-18 17:30 +0200
Re: *****SPAM***** Marking as spam Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2024-04-18 17:50 +0200
Re: Marking as spam Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br> - 2024-04-18 18:20 +0200
Re: Marking as spam The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2024-04-18 19:00 +0200
Sorry Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2024-04-18 17:20 +0200
Re: Sorry The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2024-04-18 17:30 +0200
Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d63c@ewoof.net> - 2024-04-18 12:50 +0200
On user expectations (Was Re: *****SPAM***** Re: LibreOffice removed from Debian) Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-04-18 13:40 +0200
csiph-web