Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #248789
| From | "sp007@caiway.net" <sp007@caiway.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Why do experimental packages (e.g. clang-13) get in unstable? |
| Date | 2022-06-05 09:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EuSyB-2FYj-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <DFrxf-4Om-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DFwQh-8v6-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DFVbZ-7PK-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <DGIw2-6AY-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <EuRCx-2Frq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | amd |
It has a serial connector, so I can get LIRC running again. I start studying my self programmed LIRC powered remote control system back to use. [LIRC is the tool for re-use my old self-programmed TV remote controls Always handy, a free tool to be able to get more remote controls in the house, keep my old self programmed remote controls in use again - the old ones are more reliable - and it is good to protect the environment] Arne On Sun, 5 Jun 2022 08:07:14 +0200 "sp007@caiway.net" <sp007@caiway.net> wrote: > Thanks for the reminder > > I have a still spare thin client free for testing. > > I could use this one for learning bug-fixing. > > I'll start reading the mailing lists more carefully. > > > Arne > > On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:11:50 +0100 > Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> wrote: > > > On 2022-01-15 18:33:23 +0100, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > On Vi, 14 ian 22, 15:37:21, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 10:56:19AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > > > So clang-13 1:13.0.1~+rc1-1~exp4 testing is in testing/unstable, > > > > > but the changelog says: > > > > > > > > > > llvm-toolchain-13 (1:13.0.1~+rc1-1~exp4) experimental; urgency=medium > > > > > > > > Because despite what the changelog or the version string say, the > > > > maintainer uploaded that version to unstable: > > > > > > > > https://tracker.debian.org/news/1293514/accepted-llvm-toolchain-13-11301rc1-1exp4-source-into-unstable/ > > > > > > In this particular case yes, though as far as I know it's possible that > > > a Maintainer re-uploads the same package to unstable after it's been > > > uploaded to experimental first. > > > > Thanks. I think I'll have to rely on what "apt-show-versions -a" > > says to be sure that it has really been in unstable. > > >
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why do experimental packages (e.g. clang-13) get in unstable? Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2022-01-14 11:00 +0100
Re: Why do experimental packages (e.g. clang-13) get in unstable? Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> - 2022-01-14 16:40 +0100
Re: Why do experimental packages (e.g. clang-13) get in unstable? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2022-01-15 18:40 +0100
Re: Why do experimental packages (e.g. clang-13) get in unstable? Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2022-01-17 23:20 +0100
Re: Why do experimental packages (e.g. clang-13) get in unstable? "sp007@caiway.net" <sp007@caiway.net> - 2022-06-05 08:10 +0200
Re: Why do experimental packages (e.g. clang-13) get in unstable? "sp007@caiway.net" <sp007@caiway.net> - 2022-06-05 09:10 +0200
csiph-web