Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #245002

Re: Security

Show all headers | View raw

	Hi.

On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 09:43:18AM +0100, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 30 ian 22, 19:27:56, Reco wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > How does "people installing without recommends" translate to "GNOME 
> > > users" is beyond me,
> > 
> > Easy. Look closely at two graphical frontends to libvirt they provide in
> > main archive.
> > Now ask yourself - would I need these on a server? Who would need to use
> > these?
>  
> Those who want a graphical tool to manage their VMs?

I.e. those who have a dozen VM at most, a single "server" to host them,
and said "server" is most probably translates to a localhost. I don't
see all that as a bad thing, but each GUI has its share of limitations
once it comes to managing something in big quantities, and both GNOME
boxes and Virt Manager follow that principle.


> Installing some -gnome packages still doesn't make me a GNOME user ;)

But installing them gives you a pile of GNOME core packages by
dependency.
Thus the software in question behaves the way GNOME developers want it
to behave, and the dependent software does it too. #768376 is a fine
example of that.
Thus I have bad news for you - installing either GNOME boxes or Virt
Manager (or other GNOME stuff) made you GNOME user, but if you insist
you're not - I won't press it ;)

For the record, for me both "GNOME" and "GNOME user" does not have a
negative connotation. About the only flaw of GNOME project for me is
their abuse of Scrum software development methodology, and that's a
topic for another discussion.

Reco

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Security Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2022-01-25 21:10 +0100
  Re: Security Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2022-01-25 21:50 +0100
    Re: Security Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2022-01-25 22:00 +0100
      Re: Security Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2022-01-26 16:40 +0100
  Re: Security Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2022-01-25 23:20 +0100
    Re: Security Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2022-01-26 19:40 +0100
      Re: Security Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2022-01-28 04:50 +0100
        Re: Security Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2022-01-28 14:20 +0100
          Re: Security Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2022-01-28 17:20 +0100
            Re: Security Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2022-01-28 19:00 +0100
        Re: Security Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2022-01-28 16:20 +0100
          Re: Security Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2022-01-28 17:30 +0100
          Re: Security Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2022-01-30 13:40 +0100
            Re: Security Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2022-01-30 14:20 +0100
              Re: Security Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2022-01-30 14:40 +0100
                Re: Security Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2022-01-30 17:50 +0100
                Re: Security Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2022-02-04 09:50 +0100
                Re: Security Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2022-02-04 10:20 +0100
                Re: Security <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-02-04 10:20 +0100
            Re: Security Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2022-02-01 12:30 +0100
              Re: Security Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2022-02-02 02:00 +0100
                Re: Security Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2022-02-02 15:10 +0100
        Re: Security Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2022-01-28 17:30 +0100

csiph-web