Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #244818

Re: Security

From Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Security
Date 2022-01-30 17:50 +0100
Message-ID <DLlyN-K9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <DKqqR-84C-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DKBcC-6Eh-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <DLhER-6Uh-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <DLihz-7my-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DLiAV-7tr-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


	Hi.

On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 02:39:14PM +0100, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 30 ian 22, 15:54:17, Reco wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 01:36:06AM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
> > > On 29/01/22 04:17, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Servers shouldn't have pkexec installed in the first place, anyway.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > libvirt-daemon-system depends on policykit-1.
> > > 
> > > Should that not be on my (kvm) server either?
> > 
> > Many years ago exactly this was disputed in #768376.
> > Long story short - the only reason libvirt-daemon-system depends on
> > policykit-1 is because GNOME users could be confused if it does not.
> 
> As far as I can tell the Maintainer's stance (in 2014) was:
> 
>     Having polkit installed and doing nothing (for people switching to
>     socke based permission checks) is IMHO a better service to our users
>     than having all the bugs for people installing without recommends (and
>     there are many of those)
>  
> 
> How does "people installing without recommends" translate to "GNOME 
> users" is beyond me,

Easy. Look closely at two graphical frontends to libvirt they provide in
main archive.
Now ask yourself - would I need these on a server? Who would need to use
these?


> considering that GNOME users would have policykit-1 
> installed anyway (as a dependency of GNOME) and they are much less 
> likely to disable installation of Recommends in the first place.

Back in '14 that was not universal axiom. Things have changed since then
somewhat though.


> As written in message #80 circumstances have changed, maybe the 
> Maintainer will reconsider.

Possibly, although unlikely. I mean, it was a wishlist priority bug,
after all.

My point in all this - PolicyKit was redundant on a typical server back
then, and by large it still is. Even if your server has libvirt,
although in this case some assembly is required.

Reco

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Security Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2022-01-25 21:10 +0100
  Re: Security Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2022-01-25 21:50 +0100
    Re: Security Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2022-01-25 22:00 +0100
      Re: Security Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2022-01-26 16:40 +0100
  Re: Security Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2022-01-25 23:20 +0100
    Re: Security Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2022-01-26 19:40 +0100
      Re: Security Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2022-01-28 04:50 +0100
        Re: Security Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2022-01-28 14:20 +0100
          Re: Security Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2022-01-28 17:20 +0100
            Re: Security Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2022-01-28 19:00 +0100
        Re: Security Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2022-01-28 16:20 +0100
          Re: Security Nicholas Geovanis <nickgeovanis@gmail.com> - 2022-01-28 17:30 +0100
          Re: Security Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2022-01-30 13:40 +0100
            Re: Security Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2022-01-30 14:20 +0100
              Re: Security Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2022-01-30 14:40 +0100
                Re: Security Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2022-01-30 17:50 +0100
                Re: Security Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2022-02-04 09:50 +0100
                Re: Security Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2022-02-04 10:20 +0100
                Re: Security <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2022-02-04 10:20 +0100
            Re: Security Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2022-02-01 12:30 +0100
              Re: Security Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2022-02-02 02:00 +0100
                Re: Security Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2022-02-02 15:10 +0100
        Re: Security Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2022-01-28 17:30 +0100

csiph-web