Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #243606

Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it.

From Jean-Philippe MENGUAL <jpmengual@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it.
Date 2022-01-03 04:00 +0100
Message-ID <DBlJM-2Fl-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <DBhZy-tG-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi,

Le 02/01/2022 à 23:53, gene heskett a écrit :
> Greetings All;
> 
> Without any conscious prompting by me, te debian 11.1 netinstall for x86-64
> systems installed and setup whatever was needed to bring the screen reader
> to life.

That is strange. Should not happen. The accessibility is installed only 
if you press s or if you plug a braille device.

> 
> Any thing related to a braile function that I try to remove wants to kill
> another 2 or 3 gigs of system with it.

Perhaps you can provide your /var/log/installer log somewhere to enable 
the team to see what happent? Better, you could report bug to 
debian-installer (but probably show here the log first). The log will be 
required anyway.

> 
> Quite distracting to a sighted user when that robotic voice, speaking a very
> broken bandwidth of what might be english, blaring out of ones speakers 20
> db louder than firefoxes audio can I am sure, find a way to silence this w/o
> destroying the rest of the system. Removing orca will shut it up, but that
> leaves brltty spamming the daemon.log complaining about a missing library
> every 5 seconds.  And that's close to 40 megabytes a week.

Note waiting for a good solution for packages, in your desktop, you can 
disable the accessibility via the control panel.

> 
> So, how does one shut up this useless to me, screen-reader and kill the log
> spamming at the same time?

ALso see wiki.debian.org/accessibility where you see the gsetting line 
to enable accessibility (type the same one replacing true with false to 
revert the thing).

> 
> I think its great that folks have gone to that effort for the sightless, but
> why is that sort of stuff always made mandatory.

That is a bug I see for the first time. Hence my interest for a log, as 
so far no one reported it AFAIK.

Regards
> 
> I'd sure appreciate any help cleaning it out
> 
> Thanks everybody.
> 
> Cheers, Gene Heskett.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2022-01-03 00:00 +0100
  Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-01-03 00:10 +0100
    Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2022-01-03 02:30 +0100
      Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> - 2022-01-03 03:00 +0100
        Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2022-01-03 03:20 +0100
      Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-01-04 11:30 +0100
        Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. rhkramer@gmail.com - 2022-01-04 15:00 +0100
          Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> - 2022-01-04 15:20 +0100
          Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2022-01-04 19:30 +0100
  Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2022-01-03 04:00 +0100
    Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2022-01-03 04:40 +0100
      Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2022-01-03 04:50 +0100
        Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2022-01-03 10:40 +0100
          Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2022-01-03 17:00 +0100
          Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2022-01-03 22:50 +0100
            Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2022-01-04 01:30 +0100
  Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. Jean-Philippe MENGUAL <jpmengual@debian.org> - 2022-01-03 04:00 +0100
    [FIXED] Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2022-01-03 04:50 +0100
      Re: [FIXED] Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> - 2022-01-03 08:10 +0100
        Re: [FIXED] Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2022-01-03 10:50 +0100
          Re: [FIXED] Re: brltty=huge distraction for folks that don't need it. Tom Dial <tddial@comcast.net> - 2022-01-04 08:10 +0100

csiph-web