Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #236939
| From | Joe <joe@jretrading.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: MTA |
| Date | 2021-07-05 22:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CxDxL-42a-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <CxwPD-8kc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <CxwZk-8ns-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <CxxiG-8uI-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Cxxsl-mF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <Cxy54-zB-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 16:45:17 +0200 Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> wrote: > On 2021-07-05 10:06:24 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > A more sensible antispam filter might consider a mismatched reverse > > to be one potential factor in deciding whether a given message is > > "spam". In the absence of any other factors, it shouldn't be enough > > to reject a message. But if the same message has other risk > > factors, then together they might be enough to justify that > > judgment. > > Unfortunately postfix cannot do that (it just has > reject_unknown_client_hostname, but otherwise doesn't allow > the user to control how the information is obtained and used). > Exim4 can either reject or add a warning header, which spamassassin can be told to look for. Having said that, I gave up on SA after a couple of months. That really *was* high-maintenance. I also prefer not to filter on content, as it's difficult to avoid false positives. -- Joe
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
MTA Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-07-05 15:30 +0200
Re: MTA Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-07-05 15:40 +0200
Re: MTA Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-07-05 16:00 +0200
Re: MTA Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-07-05 16:10 +0200
Re: MTA Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-07-05 16:30 +0200
Re: MTA Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-07-05 17:10 +0200
Re: MTA John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> - 2021-07-05 17:20 +0200
Re: MTA Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-07-05 16:50 +0200
Re: MTA Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2021-07-05 22:40 +0200
Re: MTA Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-07-05 16:00 +0200
Re: MTA Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-07-05 16:00 +0200
Re: MTA (corrected) Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-07-05 16:40 +0200
Re: MTA (corrected) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-07-05 17:10 +0200
Re: MTA (corrected) Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-07-05 17:50 +0200
Re: MTA (corrected) Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2021-07-05 22:20 +0200
Re: MTA (corrected) Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> - 2021-07-06 12:00 +0200
Re: MTA (corrected) Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-07-05 18:50 +0200
Re: MTA (corrected) Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-07-05 19:10 +0200
Re: MTA (corrected) Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-07-05 19:20 +0200
Re: MTA (corrected) Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-07-09 22:20 +0200
Re: MTA (corrected) Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside <debian@polynamaude.com> - 2021-07-05 19:10 +0200
Re: MTA Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2021-07-05 22:10 +0200
Re: MTA Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2021-07-05 22:30 +0200
csiph-web