Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #240024

Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap

From Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap
Date 2021-09-15 20:00 +0200
Message-ID <CXHmp-43N-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <CXDiN-1Hw-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <CXFkB-2S3-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Amateur Radio!

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

* On 2021 15 Sep 10:44 -0500, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 08:37:51AM -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > application/octet-stream; vim %s; description=Patch file; nametemplate=%s.patch
> 
> application/octet-stream is a fairly generic mime type (and an odd
> choice for a text file, but so it goes). You may find vim is not a
> suitable tool for other attachments with that mime type.

It looks like the email came from the SourceForge Web mail server and it
apparently assigned the MIME attachment type.

> That aside,
> 
> What does this command report?
> 
>     ;see --norun application/octet-stream:/dev/null

In the message window, "key not bound", in the view attachment window,
"no tagged entries".  If I tag the file attachment, then ; is accepted
and s is interpreted as 'save file' and the rest of the command string
becomes the proposed file name to save.

I tried preceding the command with : instead and that failed.

- Nate

-- 
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds.  The pessimist fears this is true."
Web: https://www.n0nb.us
Projects: https://github.com/N0NB
GPG fingerprint: 82D6 4F6B 0E67 CD41 F689 BBA6 FB2C 5130 D55A 8819

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2021-09-15 15:40 +0200
  Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> - 2021-09-15 17:50 +0200
    Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2021-09-15 20:00 +0200
      Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-09-15 20:20 +0200
        Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2021-09-15 20:20 +0200
        Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-09-15 21:20 +0200
          Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2021-09-15 23:30 +0200
            Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-09-16 04:40 +0200
              Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-09-16 08:30 +0200
              Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2021-09-16 12:40 +0200
                Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-09-19 06:50 +0200
        Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> - 2021-09-16 09:50 +0200
          Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-09-16 11:10 +0200
          Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-09-16 13:50 +0200
            Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> - 2021-09-18 00:30 +0200
  Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-09-16 09:40 +0200
    Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2021-09-16 12:10 +0200

csiph-web