Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #240025

Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap

From Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap
Date 2021-09-15 20:20 +0200
Message-ID <CXHFM-4py-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <CXDiN-1Hw-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <CXFkB-2S3-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <CXHmp-43N-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:58:10PM -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2021 15 Sep 10:44 -0500, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > What does this command report?
> > 
> >     ;see --norun application/octet-stream:/dev/null
> 
> In the message window, "key not bound", in the view attachment window,
> "no tagged entries".  If I tag the file attachment, then ; is accepted
> and s is interpreted as 'save file' and the rest of the command string
> becomes the proposed file name to save.
> 
> I tried preceding the command with : instead and that failed.

Jonathan's message confused me too.  As far as I can tell, "see" is
a *shell* command, not a mutt command.  I don't know why there's a ";"
in front of it.

unicorn:~$ see --norun application/octet-stream:/dev/null
Error: no "view" mailcap rules found for type "application/octet-stream"

Nothing else I tried made any more sense than that.  Even using ":"
instead of ";" (to invoke it as a mutt command) didn't work, because "see"
isn't a mutt command.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2021-09-15 15:40 +0200
  Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> - 2021-09-15 17:50 +0200
    Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2021-09-15 20:00 +0200
      Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-09-15 20:20 +0200
        Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2021-09-15 20:20 +0200
        Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-09-15 21:20 +0200
          Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2021-09-15 23:30 +0200
            Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-09-16 04:40 +0200
              Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-09-16 08:30 +0200
              Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2021-09-16 12:40 +0200
                Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-09-19 06:50 +0200
        Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> - 2021-09-16 09:50 +0200
          Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-09-16 11:10 +0200
          Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-09-16 13:50 +0200
            Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> - 2021-09-18 00:30 +0200
  Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-09-16 09:40 +0200
    Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2021-09-16 12:10 +0200

csiph-web