Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #240025
| From | Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap |
| Date | 2021-09-15 20:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <CXHFM-4py-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <CXDiN-1Hw-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <CXFkB-2S3-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <CXHmp-43N-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:58:10PM -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote: > * On 2021 15 Sep 10:44 -0500, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > What does this command report? > > > > ;see --norun application/octet-stream:/dev/null > > In the message window, "key not bound", in the view attachment window, > "no tagged entries". If I tag the file attachment, then ; is accepted > and s is interpreted as 'save file' and the rest of the command string > becomes the proposed file name to save. > > I tried preceding the command with : instead and that failed. Jonathan's message confused me too. As far as I can tell, "see" is a *shell* command, not a mutt command. I don't know why there's a ";" in front of it. unicorn:~$ see --norun application/octet-stream:/dev/null Error: no "view" mailcap rules found for type "application/octet-stream" Nothing else I tried made any more sense than that. Even using ":" instead of ";" (to invoke it as a mutt command) didn't work, because "see" isn't a mutt command.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2021-09-15 15:40 +0200
Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> - 2021-09-15 17:50 +0200
Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2021-09-15 20:00 +0200
Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-09-15 20:20 +0200
Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2021-09-15 20:20 +0200
Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-09-15 21:20 +0200
Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2021-09-15 23:30 +0200
Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-09-16 04:40 +0200
Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-09-16 08:30 +0200
Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2021-09-16 12:40 +0200
Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2021-09-19 06:50 +0200
Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> - 2021-09-16 09:50 +0200
Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-09-16 11:10 +0200
Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2021-09-16 13:50 +0200
Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> - 2021-09-18 00:30 +0200
Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-09-16 09:40 +0200
Re: Mutt/Neomutt and mailcap Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2021-09-16 12:10 +0200
csiph-web