Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #230785
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) |
| Date | 2021-01-18 10:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <Byz1f-2QP-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <BxY1H-5nE-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <BxYl5-5JB-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <BxZTQ-6vR-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <BymGK-3Ux-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <BywZr-1GP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 09:19:10AM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Du, 17 ian 21, 20:12:38, Brian wrote: > > On Sat 16 Jan 2021 at 20:57:19 +0100, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: [...] > > > This > > > may have advantages and disadvantages, but you don't get to control > > > those :) > > > > In terms of control, the burnt-in firmware cannot cannot be controlled > > either. I do not know where this gets us. I don't know what was ambiguous in what I said. I said "you don't get to control when (and what kind of) an update arrives". No more, no less. In the case of a burnt-in firmware, you get to work with a "known xxx" [1] state. You lear to know (and possibly circumvent) bugs, backdoors and other old fellas. > Besides, the manufacturer might even fix some bugs in the firmware. Or to insert new and nastier backdoors, as mandated by their local government (or by their new, ad-industry fueled corporate overlords, or by whomever whose interests might not align with yours). Did I say "advantages and disadvantages? Cheers [1] for "xxx" in "good", "bad" and any other suitable value in between. - t
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) Steven Mainor <steve@degga.net> - 2021-01-16 18:30 +0100
Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2021-01-16 19:00 +0100
Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) Steven Mainor <steve@degga.net> - 2021-01-16 19:20 +0100
Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-01-16 19:30 +0100
Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-01-16 20:40 +0100
Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2021-01-16 22:20 +0100
Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-01-17 20:30 +0100
Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-01-16 23:00 +0100
Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> - 2021-01-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2021-01-17 06:10 +0100
Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2021-01-17 13:50 +0100
Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 08:20 +0100
Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 08:00 +0100
Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) didier gaumet <didier.gaumet@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 10:00 +0100
Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-01-16 21:00 +0100
Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2021-01-17 21:20 +0100
Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 08:20 +0100
Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-01-18 10:30 +0100
Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2021-01-16 21:50 +0100
Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2021-01-17 02:50 +0100
Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2021-01-17 10:20 +0100
Re: Open source Atheros wifi? (ath10k) Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2021-01-16 22:50 +0100
csiph-web