Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #226773

Printed page vs. computer screen (was: Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions)

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From rhkramer@gmail.com
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Printed page vs. computer screen (was: Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions)
Date Tue, 08 Sep 2020 01:20:01 +0200
Message-ID <AMyAx-3Lo-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <AMpGW-6Jk-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <AMuwW-19H-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <AMyAx-3Lo-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-user@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-user-request@lists.debian.org Mon Sep 7 23:10:56 2020
Old-Return-Path <rhkramer@gmail.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-7.199 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -5.5
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=9ABXp1+ywhYiTfvDGMrbW+QkD55EIqr72v4msDDTr38=; b=Eult8vpzCv2hciV1juaLkaxqfv1lKrtKWc5gXqKhMwXGkW+tcb93LOVvLwk+jiYNgA ElUdDVS0Yy4jrrZ0B3Jx0oIzH30PPfKJbegQCK+xSUoy00pfNO5ELmHDPNggxSBcNkBx HzQHzWKaJytrKj8wYMxfn/TQlatZuHAGTXPn2qiM6tQMCKaZYk6BYkBhnllXY47vR5Uf C5XUzMZlE9oXAfJP3TttmExapEI5NRMpyPkwhB5RxgNg4SurirPWf+GzQiO0NaVdJ/Sd p0ith/J8Te3zRvT99vWY4EpcA/37Udpzbt5+KFE6pI58dyef2NKGpjRrK+fEPFHlloRm zETw==
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=9ABXp1+ywhYiTfvDGMrbW+QkD55EIqr72v4msDDTr38=; b=F3owkmWoeweWqdF5lFJ0Eis7ZDY2yBYiZckqC8MGiFKS8SsGRhGFwh1DmTGNS7pvsf 8S/Eq1YefRLGgshfcvbZ1FU93aa6pqEDs5UDb4+rzkFPVpH/HpWZ6GzXdeybv6RQ8fMd iD/yN/vGrpvRAU0ZTjj/nnDLUC0I+rr+0hIW3BkLCDmay7ezU1U+JpIlDiSn4S4uwGFE mmhvRLrAeeRY/VOJbrq6QhU8wkPV1V2A20DRL7TpKZZQVZcjp0Kk7/Al029VIDKAfjmW Zlclu5AWFTVHvgoz9NrmiTOdLc1CgMit0/j+zvbnO0cM7gKyvbTIUyvkZd47hWZBmiSB CvPg==
X-Gm-Message-State AOAM532AgMCg5K3jKXkDTDg35Qn77ZDq92PqUgwqjrZEnCvzwRFJHJpQ EStnjX3971ZHWJmrw+pMlpW75hFlJt4=
X-Google-SMTP-Source ABdhPJxxMSsfoBfpWhd/Y9LgPSH/TjVm+bM4IEn2sG//N3VHZ7IKyiciAHMkOILXyE15vHjqdlXjdQ==
X-Received by 2002:a0c:a481:: with SMTP id x1mr20514191qvx.6.1599520241032; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 16:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-6-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; )
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Mailing-List <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/767124
List-ID <debian-user.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/202009071910.39421.rhkramer@gmail.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 14
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Mon, 7 Sep 2020 19:10:39 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID <202009071910.39421.rhkramer@gmail.com>
X-Original-References <f7d642b7-fd2b-cabb-9040-d2299be21d2f@cloud85.net> <20200907185340.GA16077@axis.corp> <8627b4a1-1eaa-f1b6-129d-c5a52588c06e@gmail.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.user:226773

Show key headers only | View raw

On Monday, September 07, 2020 03:46:39 PM D. R. Evans wrote:
> Sorry; I missed that. (I find it too easy to skim instead of actually
> /read/ on a computer screen.)

That's interesting, I'll say it this way first, then elaborate a little.

I tend to skim more on the printed page than on the computer screen.  (But, 
even then, I tend to skim somewhat, especially in long texts.

The elaboration : I also tend to read too fast, not catching the exact nuance 
of some of the words used on the computer screen (and on printed pages).

The computer screen has the advantage for me of being able to adjust (usually 
increase) the font size.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2020-09-07 15:50 +0200
  Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-09-07 16:20 +0200
    Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-09-07 16:50 +0200
    Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2020-09-07 17:10 +0200
      Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2020-09-07 17:20 +0200
        Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2020-09-07 17:50 +0200
  Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Jonathan Dowland <jon+debian-user@dow.land> - 2020-09-07 16:30 +0200
    Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2020-09-07 17:20 +0200
      Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Andrew Cater <amacater@gmail.com> - 2020-09-07 17:30 +0200
        Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-09-07 20:00 +0200
          Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Andrew Cater <amacater@gmail.com> - 2020-09-07 20:10 +0200
            Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-09-07 20:30 +0200
          Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2020-09-07 21:30 +0200
            Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-09-07 22:00 +0200
              Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Andrew Cater <amacater@gmail.com> - 2020-09-07 22:10 +0200
                Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-09-08 07:50 +0200
                Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2020-09-08 14:30 +0200
                Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-09-08 19:30 +0200
                Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2020-09-08 21:30 +0200
                Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-09-08 22:00 +0200
                Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2020-09-08 17:20 +0200
                Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-09-08 19:40 +0200
                Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2020-09-09 07:50 +0200
                Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2020-09-09 14:20 +0200
                Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-09-09 14:30 +0200
                Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2020-09-09 14:50 +0200
                Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-09-09 20:50 +0200
              Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Kenneth Parker <sea7kenp@gmail.com> - 2020-09-08 00:00 +0200
            Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-09-08 10:50 +0200
              Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-09-08 19:40 +0200
                Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2020-09-09 07:40 +0200
                Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2020-09-09 14:20 +0200
      Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2020-09-07 21:00 +0200
        Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2020-09-07 22:20 +0200
        Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2020-09-07 23:40 +0200
          Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2020-09-08 00:10 +0200
            Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2020-09-08 08:10 +0200
      Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-09-07 21:00 +0200
        Printed page vs. computer screen (was: Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions) rhkramer@gmail.com - 2020-09-08 01:20 +0200
  Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Georgi Naplatanov <gosho@oles.biz> - 2020-09-07 16:30 +0200
  Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2020-09-07 17:00 +0200
    Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2020-09-07 20:00 +0200
      Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2020-09-07 21:10 +0200
        Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> - 2020-09-07 21:30 +0200
          Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2020-09-07 23:00 +0200
        Re: 32 versus 64 bit reading list suggestions Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2020-09-07 22:30 +0200

csiph-web