|
Subject
|
Author
|
Date [asc]
|
|
Re: CVE-2016-7117 Remote code execution vulnerability in kernel networking subsystem
|
Felix Knecht <debian@felixknecht.de> |
2016-10-04 19:50 +0200 |
|
Re: CVE-2016-7117 Remote code execution vulnerability in kernel networking subsystem
|
Nicholas Luedtke <nicholas.luedtke@hpe.com> |
2016-10-04 20:00 +0200 |
|
Re: CVE-2016-7117 Remote code execution vulnerability in kernel networking subsystem
|
Jan Lühr <jan@jluehr.de> |
2016-10-05 00:00 +0200 |
|
Re: CVE-2016-7117 Remote code execution vulnerability in kernel networking subsystem
|
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
2016-10-05 07:00 +0200 |
|
Re: CVE-2016-7117 Remote code execution vulnerability in kernel networking subsystem
|
Jan Lühr <jan@jluehr.de> |
2016-10-05 10:00 +0200 |
|
Re: CVE-2016-7117 Remote code execution vulnerability in kernel networking subsystem
|
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
2016-10-05 10:00 +0200 |
|
timing of PHP 5.6 security updates
|
tmc <tmc@vandradlabs.com.au> |
2016-10-05 12:20 +0200 |
|
Re: timing of PHP 5.6 security updates
|
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
2016-10-05 22:10 +0200 |
|
Re: timing of PHP 5.6 security updates
|
tmc <tmc@vandradlabs.com.au> |
2016-10-05 22:50 +0200 |
|
Helping Debian Lists Address S*P*A*M (Was: Activate your GlobalTestMarket membership)
|
Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> |
2016-10-07 14:40 +0200 |
|
Re: timing of PHP 5.6 security updates
|
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
2016-10-08 16:30 +0200 |
|
Re: timing of PHP 5.6 security updates
|
tmc <tmc@vandradlabs.com.au> |
2016-10-09 01:20 +0200 |
|
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Debian Security Advisory DSA-2949-1 security@debian.org http://www.debian.org/security/ Salvatore Bonaccorso June 05, 2014 http://www.debian.org/security/faq - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Package : linux CVE ID : CVE-2014-3144 CVE-2014-3145 CVE-2014-3153 Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in the Linux kernel that may lead to a denial of service or privilege escalation: CVE-2014-3144 / CVE-2014-3145 A local user can cause a denial of service (system crash) via crafted BPF instructions. CVE-2014-3153 Pinkie Pie discovered an issue in the futex subsystem that allows a local user to gain ring 0 control via the futex syscall. An unprivileged user could use this flaw to crash the kernel (resulting in denial of service) or for privilege escalation. For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in version 3.2.57-3+deb7u2. For the unstable
|
maher abidi <abidimaher87@gmail.com> |
2016-10-10 19:50 +0200 |
|
Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct?
|
te3d4q@sigaint.org |
2016-10-11 17:10 +0200 |
|
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct?
|
Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> |
2016-10-11 17:30 +0200 |
|
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct?
|
te3d4q@sigaint.org |
2016-10-11 22:10 +0200 |
|
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct?
|
Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org> |
2016-10-11 23:10 +0200 |
|
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct?
|
te3d4q@sigaint.org |
2016-10-12 12:50 +0200 |
|
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct?
|
Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> |
2016-10-12 17:20 +0200 |
|
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct?
|
Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> |
2016-10-12 22:40 +0200 |
|
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct?
|
te3d4q@sigaint.org |
2016-10-13 16:50 +0200 |
|
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct?
|
te3d4q@sigaint.org |
2016-10-13 16:50 +0200 |
|
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct?
|
Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> |
2016-10-13 20:40 +0200 |
|
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct?
|
Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> |
2016-10-18 22:30 +0200 |
|
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct?
|
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> |
2016-10-19 17:00 +0200 |
|
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct?
|
Alexander Schreiber <als@thangorodrim.ch> |
2016-10-20 01:00 +0200 |
|
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct?
|
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> |
2016-10-20 02:40 +0200 |
|
Novell Users list
|
"Cheryl Walker " <cheryl.walker@hostingintellect.com> |
2016-11-02 15:10 +0100 |
|
Re: Userdata stays in RAM after Logout and Relogin
|
herve <herve@couvelard.com> |
2016-11-04 17:40 +0100 |
|
Urgent Credit Notice !
|
"Us Debt Admin." <kusoyaro379@gmail.com> |
2016-11-04 19:20 +0100 |
|
RE: Userdata stays in RAM after Logout and Relogin
|
"Radzykewycz, T (Radzy)" <radzy@windriver.com> |
2016-11-04 20:30 +0100 |
|
Re: Userdata stays in RAM after Logout and Relogin
|
Felix Knecht <debian@felixknecht.de> |
2016-11-04 23:40 +0100 |
|
Re: Userdata stays in RAM after Logout and Relogin
|
"H. N." <deb_mailinglist@niemeczek.at> |
2016-11-05 01:20 +0100 |
|
Re: Userdata stays in RAM after Logout and Relogin
|
Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> |
2016-11-06 01:00 +0100 |
|
Re: Userdata stays in RAM after Logout and Relogin
|
"H. N." <deb_mailinglist@niemeczek.at> |
2016-11-06 10:40 +0100 |
|
vulnerability in 8.6
|
Ozgur <okaratas@member.fsf.org> |
2016-11-07 17:00 +0100 |
|
Re: vulnerability in 8.6
|
Richard van den Berg <richard@vdberg.org> |
2016-11-07 17:20 +0100 |
|
Re: vulnerability in 8.6
|
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> |
2016-11-07 17:20 +0100 |
|
Re: vulnerability in 8.6
|
Ozgur <okaratas@member.fsf.org> |
2016-11-07 17:50 +0100 |
|
Re: vulnerability in 8.6
|
Nicholas Luedtke <nicholas.luedtke@hpe.com> |
2016-11-07 18:00 +0100 |
|
Re: vulnerability in 8.6
|
Matias Mucciolo <mmucciolo@suteba.org.ar> |
2016-11-07 18:00 +0100 |
|
Re: vulnerability in 8.6
|
Ozgur <okaratas@member.fsf.org> |
2016-11-07 18:10 +0100 |
|
Re: vulnerability in 8.6
|
Matias Mucciolo <mmucciolo@suteba.org.ar> |
2016-11-07 18:10 +0100 |
|
Re: vulnerability in 8.6
|
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br> |
2016-11-07 18:20 +0100 |
|
Re: vulnerability in 8.6
|
Andrew Deck <andrew.hastings.deck@gmail.com> |
2016-11-07 18:20 +0100 |
|
Re: vulnerability in 8.6
|
Mike Oliver <mike@mopmeat.net> |
2016-11-07 18:30 +0100 |
|
Re: vulnerability in 8.6
|
Ozgur <okaratas@member.fsf.org> |
2016-11-07 20:00 +0100 |
|
Re: vulnerability in 8.6
|
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br> |
2016-11-07 20:00 +0100 |
|
Handling of "malware" in Debian
|
"W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> |
2016-11-09 16:00 +0100 |
|
Re: Handling of "malware" in Debian
|
Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> |
2016-11-09 16:00 +0100 |