Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.security > #5089
| From | "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.security |
| Subject | Handling of "malware" in Debian |
| Date | 2016-11-09 16:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sBCw1-el-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi, because of the WOT[*] incident, I wonder how Debian should handle malware packages in favour of our users. The current scheme is to remove the offending package from stable and go along. With unattended-upgrades or other automatic upgrade schemes, such packages would remain on many systems and potentially harm users. I suggest to handle such cases differently by uploading a new, empty package (like transitional packages, but without new depends). What do you think? Cheers [*] https://bugs.debian.org/842939
Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Handling of "malware" in Debian "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2016-11-09 16:00 +0100
csiph-web