Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.security > #4460 > unrolled thread
| Started by | David ISIDORE <isidoredavid@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-11 00:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-01-13 14:30 +0100 |
| Articles | 8 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.security
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3438-1] xscreensaver security update David ISIDORE <isidoredavid@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 00:30 +0100
Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3438-1] xscreensaver security update David Cachau <safranil@safranil.fr> - 2016-01-11 01:00 +0100
Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3438-1] xscreensaver security update "contact@baal.fr" <contact@baal.fr> - 2016-01-11 01:10 +0100
Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3438-1] xscreensaver security update Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org> - 2016-01-11 09:20 +0100
Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3438-1] xscreensaver security update Povl Ole Haarlev Olsen <debian-security@stderr.dk> - 2016-01-11 10:30 +0100
Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3438-1] xscreensaver security update Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 17:20 +0100
Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3438-1] xscreensaver security update Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org> - 2016-01-11 18:20 +0100
Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3438-1] xscreensaver security update Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 14:30 +0100
| From | David ISIDORE <isidoredavid@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 00:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3438-1] xscreensaver security update |
| Message-ID | <qPxAS-2uO-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi, I'm not on Debian anymore. How can I unsubscribe from mailing list? 2016-01-10 20:08 GMT+01:00 Michael Gilbert <mgilbert@debian.org>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Debian Security Advisory DSA-3438-1 security@debian.org > https://www.debian.org/security/ Michael Gilbert > January 09, 2016 https://www.debian.org/security/faq > - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Package : xscreensaver > CVE ID : CVE-2015-8025 > Debian Bug : 802914 > > It was discovered that unplugging one of the monitors in a multi-monitor > setup can cause xscreensaver to crash. Someone with physical access to > a machine could use this problem to bypass a locked session. > > For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed > in version 5.15-3+deb7u1. > > For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in > version 5.30-1+deb8u1. > > For the testing (stretch) and unstable (sid) distributions, this problem > has been fixed in version 5.34-1. > > We recommend that you upgrade your xscreensaver packages. > > Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply > these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be > found at: https://www.debian.org/security/ > > Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1 > > iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJWkdSSAAoJELjWss0C1vRz8f8gAKZVd93r5W9p1DzxjaKo0OCi > cIBnzsUrCi1m89yztrecnYORFAEc5KRMras50I5OcTNQzOqyY0nl9VzfDL4mRIfP > w3p1qyNDvh51+4Kjnrf3g+UxiwcvZg9Js+Y5wWGI5xMeGNyJO9nARi7E1gvHOxu5 > mNoPaZTUiitxsYYR6qNliLWvqeK2DYL+cLHkzP9p14yLumlUpdML33xvgwnznUpH > UlgUCsXxvrPUYgmOACQN23WZ5ETsdj6ZKArGlpCvlx2769o+MziecICY0nYvV+St > KzWoFvf0CQ2JoyIKUcqWvCOl2ku14bSbIW5ySWHehvw+c9lSo/xbeYECUSXUf9d2 > JoO0GPUwTCGGsXsDuTj+UxmzC+7qXOgutiMA6aXWGxWlvewy9+366GVgOqvkjOly > 6/pNRVGX39xZAXdJR+jHuPldjF7iZx3v2R++Oc95nP94A3+RLksku0ZUIrG0mjli > tsfzyYzvjpxDEhS5ETn4V7aKqo0veYwuUCmFgzMjRpIKG3s+jMoO8BJmBb7FW6SR > EIyHvkhir7uVHG8ERJbAQxjWaBzqSOy45fDtasNSChhHZdH4NNzmFyY32Os7FjNF > lVIcXYaOKr+mhnDekYWGvGj+Fr08U+dJBPUztYuRS8MClIgED+y77867PovwyQdR > UM70qRYLpVDCkh46QZ/7dMEbCD5goeuJetshk90cyhl4WgRsyJMmcglIrGBi04aI > yK9JuuqPLesYrlgS+IlhNwhAGVlwrLFtj9vat/E5WckjiXN/fSuLyHxtt/lKLKsx > dxE889BHXrju7QzuCSH9KeGIpnm66CdWhIKn4SRZiaXjC6NbwHyNxalF/F9Xj6uy > q3hPzOXYddASQEH9Wyk1swlXk92uIGq8qo8fqOH9ANygcPEdFxCvSntweIrfqg6A > nJ6xBdW6aMKlLK1Tu/kq3pnIsUUz8tGIdzgYuOIucnbECIJl1SgG8O1XQXAvDx0G > kFVsuxnRJ/3f88+Y0PF1n50/90NCbXBYMQfky27R4xpQXDxppkfH2HYi1MEDXZiq > ZQQL5nm3ZbHprgVSQTrjiZ7E/lDv+g0iyd8EnUmTUi2BCOCPJqdW8+HvfKw74T7n > sDjAn+D6IDlk+qSZwVFMgzZVhOVK8dANQIOzH8Pb2VcTTVuA4SHsEyZ75lkvpXrt > 76QnSPDEo+ItK6+4j2rrZ/Smsl6ujqr7ttPLKrb+/gH/0RlYfyY+NZ6auM27bTTY > eqgKvNM9apzppcX2piMf6OUKV/cMbl+XdWdq0xEgtRixBc/OzhSE+GTTySVriP7/ > UeJinBxRZROJZMBzyavcd8hPX8iLpm9jp4PeyBoDaawUdbgxSc6hwjsVBDUQszY= > =k6lg > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Cachau <safranil@safranil.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 01:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qPy3V-2Gd-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #4460 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hello, You can follow instructions on this URL: https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#subunsub Or use this form : https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/unsubscribe Good bye Le 11/01/2016 00:04, David ISIDORE a écrit : > Hi, I'm not on Debian anymore. How can I unsubscribe from mailing list? > > 2016-01-10 20:08 GMT+01:00 Michael Gilbert <mgilbert@debian.org <mailto:mgilbert@debian.org>>: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Debian Security Advisory DSA-3438-1 > security@debian.org <mailto:security@debian.org> > https://www.debian.org/security/ Michael Gilbert > January 09, 2016 https://www.debian.org/security/faq > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Package : xscreensaver > CVE ID : CVE-2015-8025 > Debian Bug : 802914 > > It was discovered that unplugging one of the monitors in a multi-monitor > setup can cause xscreensaver to crash. Someone with physical access to > a machine could use this problem to bypass a locked session. > > For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed > in version 5.15-3+deb7u1. > > For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in > version 5.30-1+deb8u1. > > For the testing (stretch) and unstable (sid) distributions, this problem > has been fixed in version 5.34-1. > > We recommend that you upgrade your xscreensaver packages. > > Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply > these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be > found at: https://www.debian.org/security/ > > Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org > <mailto:debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org> > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "contact@baal.fr" <contact@baal.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 01:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qPydz-2YB-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #4460 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
send unsuscribe to the mailing list Le 11/01/2016 00:04, David ISIDORE a écrit : > Hi, I'm not on Debian anymore. How can I unsubscribe from mailing list? > > 2016-01-10 20:08 GMT+01:00 Michael Gilbert <mgilbert@debian.org > <mailto:mgilbert@debian.org>>: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > - > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Debian Security Advisory DSA-3438-1 security@debian.org > <mailto:security@debian.org> > https://www.debian.org/security/ Michael Gilbert > January 09, 2016 https://www.debian.org/security/faq > - > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Package : xscreensaver > CVE ID : CVE-2015-8025 > Debian Bug : 802914 > > It was discovered that unplugging one of the monitors in a > multi-monitor > setup can cause xscreensaver to crash. Someone with physical > access to > a machine could use this problem to bypass a locked session. > > For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed > in version 5.15-3+deb7u1. > > For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in > version 5.30-1+deb8u1. > > For the testing (stretch) and unstable (sid) distributions, this > problem > has been fixed in version 5.34-1. > > We recommend that you upgrade your xscreensaver packages. > > Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply > these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be > found at: https://www.debian.org/security/ > > Mailing list: debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org > <mailto:debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1 > > iQQcBAEBCgAGBQJWkdSSAAoJELjWss0C1vRz8f8gAKZVd93r5W9p1DzxjaKo0OCi > cIBnzsUrCi1m89yztrecnYORFAEc5KRMras50I5OcTNQzOqyY0nl9VzfDL4mRIfP > w3p1qyNDvh51+4Kjnrf3g+UxiwcvZg9Js+Y5wWGI5xMeGNyJO9nARi7E1gvHOxu5 > mNoPaZTUiitxsYYR6qNliLWvqeK2DYL+cLHkzP9p14yLumlUpdML33xvgwnznUpH > UlgUCsXxvrPUYgmOACQN23WZ5ETsdj6ZKArGlpCvlx2769o+MziecICY0nYvV+St > KzWoFvf0CQ2JoyIKUcqWvCOl2ku14bSbIW5ySWHehvw+c9lSo/xbeYECUSXUf9d2 > JoO0GPUwTCGGsXsDuTj+UxmzC+7qXOgutiMA6aXWGxWlvewy9+366GVgOqvkjOly > 6/pNRVGX39xZAXdJR+jHuPldjF7iZx3v2R++Oc95nP94A3+RLksku0ZUIrG0mjli > tsfzyYzvjpxDEhS5ETn4V7aKqo0veYwuUCmFgzMjRpIKG3s+jMoO8BJmBb7FW6SR > EIyHvkhir7uVHG8ERJbAQxjWaBzqSOy45fDtasNSChhHZdH4NNzmFyY32Os7FjNF > lVIcXYaOKr+mhnDekYWGvGj+Fr08U+dJBPUztYuRS8MClIgED+y77867PovwyQdR > UM70qRYLpVDCkh46QZ/7dMEbCD5goeuJetshk90cyhl4WgRsyJMmcglIrGBi04aI > yK9JuuqPLesYrlgS+IlhNwhAGVlwrLFtj9vat/E5WckjiXN/fSuLyHxtt/lKLKsx > dxE889BHXrju7QzuCSH9KeGIpnm66CdWhIKn4SRZiaXjC6NbwHyNxalF/F9Xj6uy > q3hPzOXYddASQEH9Wyk1swlXk92uIGq8qo8fqOH9ANygcPEdFxCvSntweIrfqg6A > nJ6xBdW6aMKlLK1Tu/kq3pnIsUUz8tGIdzgYuOIucnbECIJl1SgG8O1XQXAvDx0G > kFVsuxnRJ/3f88+Y0PF1n50/90NCbXBYMQfky27R4xpQXDxppkfH2HYi1MEDXZiq > ZQQL5nm3ZbHprgVSQTrjiZ7E/lDv+g0iyd8EnUmTUi2BCOCPJqdW8+HvfKw74T7n > sDjAn+D6IDlk+qSZwVFMgzZVhOVK8dANQIOzH8Pb2VcTTVuA4SHsEyZ75lkvpXrt > 76QnSPDEo+ItK6+4j2rrZ/Smsl6ujqr7ttPLKrb+/gH/0RlYfyY+NZ6auM27bTTY > eqgKvNM9apzppcX2piMf6OUKV/cMbl+XdWdq0xEgtRixBc/OzhSE+GTTySVriP7/ > UeJinBxRZROJZMBzyavcd8hPX8iLpm9jp4PeyBoDaawUdbgxSc6hwjsVBDUQszY= > =k6lg > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 09:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qPFRM-86W-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #4462 |
contact@baal.fr wrote on Mon, Jan 11, 2016: > Le 11/01/2016 00:04, David ISIDORE a écrit : > > I'm not on Debian anymore. How can I unsubscribe from mailing list? > > send unsuscribe to the mailing list This is confusing and would likely lead to erroneous messages to the actual list, so allowing myself to reply... As per the mail headers: List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debian-security-request@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe> You can send a mail to debian-security-request@lists.debian.org with 'unsubscribe' as Subject and any body. Please note that this is not debian-security@lists.debian.org itself. For what it's worth, RFC 2369 headers are fairly old and quite a few clients should support these and have an option hidden somewhere 'unsubscribe to the list' that will do exactly that. Sorry for the noise to all who don't care, -- Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus, Not that it's going to prevent more of these emails in the future, but, hey, I tried.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Povl Ole Haarlev Olsen <debian-security@stderr.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 10:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qPGXw-mu-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #4464 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016, Dominique Martinet wrote: > contact@baal.fr wrote on Mon, Jan 11, 2016: >> Le 11/01/2016 00:04, David ISIDORE a écrit : >>> I'm not on Debian anymore. How can I unsubscribe from mailing list? >> send unsuscribe to the mailing list > This is confusing and would likely lead to erroneous messages to the > actual list, so allowing myself to reply... > As per the mail headers: > List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debian-security-request@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe> > You can send a mail to debian-security-request@lists.debian.org with > 'unsubscribe' as Subject and any body. > Please note that this is not debian-security@lists.debian.org itself. > For what it's worth, RFC 2369 headers are fairly old and quite a few > clients should support these and have an option hidden somewhere > 'unsubscribe to the list' that will do exactly that. > Sorry for the noise to all who don't care, Allow me to add some more noise. The original mail was sent to the debian-security-announce mailinglist, not this list. The unsubscribe address for that list is: List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debian-security-announce-request@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe> -- Povl Ole
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 17:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qPNmi-4Mf-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #4465 |
On 1/11/16, Povl Ole Haarlev Olsen <debian-security@stderr.dk> wrote: > > Allow me to add some more noise. > > The original mail was sent to the debian-security-announce mailinglist, > not this list. The unsubscribe address for that list is: > > List-Unsubscribe: > <mailto:debian-security-announce-request@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe> And now me.. I didn't notice that (about the Announce list) originally. I've seen it happen a few times across the Net. It doesn't seem like that should be able to occur. It seems like Announce lists are regularly intended as a one-way admin only message source.. Or not? Just thinking out loud... that maybe the Announce list settings might need a quick once-over review depending on admin's intentions for it. :) Or not. :) Cindy :) -- Cindy-Sue Causey Talking Rock, Pickens County, Georgia, USA * #RIP, Ian. Thank you and to all who contribute to Debian. It's a Life-affecting, Life-enhancing resource and tool in my usage case. *
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-11 18:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qPOil-5rH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #4466 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:14:52AM -0500, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote: > Just thinking out loud... that maybe the Announce list settings might > need a quick once-over review depending on admin's intentions for it. The ability to send mail to the debian-security-announce list is restricted, and the settings work as intended. Note that Debian security announcements include a Reply-To header redirecting replies to the debian-security@lists.debian.org discussion list, so it's possible to send a reply and think that it did go through, when in fact it went to a different mailing list. In fact, that's exactly what's happening here. This thread is taking place on debian-security@lists.debian.org, even though it was triggered by a reply to a security announcement on debian-security-announce. noah
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-13 14:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qQtEU-hT-61@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #4468 |
On 1/11/16, Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:14:52AM -0500, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote: >> >> ** Not sure proper protocol but reinserted my original thought process >> And now me.. I didn't notice that (about the Announce list) >> originally. I've seen it happen a few times across the Net. It doesn't >> seem like that should be able to occur. It seems like Announce lists >> are regularly intended as a one-way admin only message source.. >> >> Just thinking out loud... that maybe the Announce list settings might >> need a quick once-over review depending on admin's intentions for it. > > The ability to send mail to the debian-security-announce list is > restricted, and the settings work as intended. Note that Debian security > announcements include a Reply-To header redirecting replies to the > debian-security@lists.debian.org discussion list, so it's possible to > send a reply and think that it did go through, when in fact it went to a > different mailing list. In fact, that's exactly what's happening here. > This thread is taking place on debian-security@lists.debian.org, even > though it was triggered by a reply to a security announcement on > debian-security-announce. Good deal. Crossed my mind that I didn't receive 2 copies but didn't think about checking online archives before posting my response. It's a great tip suggestion to now have in mind for those other unrelated listservs where it *does* happen, most often on federal dotGov government listservs of all things. *grin* Cindy :) -- Cindy-Sue Causey Talking Rock, Pickens County, Georgia, USA * #RIP, Ian. Thank you and to all who contribute to Debian. It's a Life-affecting, Life-enhancing resource and tool in my usage case. *
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.security
csiph-web