Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.security > #4473

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3438-1] xscreensaver security update

From Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.security
Subject Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3438-1] xscreensaver security update
Date 2016-01-13 14:30 +0100
Message-ID <qQtEU-hT-61@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <qPydz-2YB-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qPFRM-86W-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qPGXw-mu-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qPNmi-4Mf-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <qPOil-5rH-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 1/11/16, Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:14:52AM -0500, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
>>
>> ** Not sure proper protocol but reinserted my original thought process
>> And now me.. I didn't notice that (about the Announce list)
>> originally. I've seen it happen a few times across the Net. It doesn't
>> seem like that should be able to occur. It seems like Announce lists
>> are regularly intended as a one-way admin only message source..
>>
>> Just thinking out loud... that maybe the Announce list settings might
>> need a quick once-over review depending on admin's intentions for it.
>
> The ability to send mail to the debian-security-announce list is
> restricted, and the settings work as intended. Note that Debian security
> announcements include a Reply-To header redirecting replies to the
> debian-security@lists.debian.org discussion list, so it's possible to
> send a reply and think that it did go through, when in fact it went to a
> different mailing list. In fact, that's exactly what's happening here.
> This thread is taking place on debian-security@lists.debian.org, even
> though it was triggered by a reply to a security announcement on
> debian-security-announce.


Good deal. Crossed my mind that I didn't receive 2 copies but didn't
think about checking online archives before posting my response. It's
a great tip suggestion to now have in mind for those other unrelated
listservs where it *does* happen, most often on federal dotGov
government listservs of all things. *grin*

Cindy :)

-- 
Cindy-Sue Causey
Talking Rock, Pickens County, Georgia, USA

* #RIP, Ian. Thank you and to all who contribute to Debian. It's a
Life-affecting, Life-enhancing resource and tool in my usage case. *

Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3438-1] xscreensaver security update David ISIDORE <isidoredavid@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 00:30 +0100
  Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3438-1] xscreensaver security update David Cachau <safranil@safranil.fr> - 2016-01-11 01:00 +0100
  Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3438-1] xscreensaver security update "contact@baal.fr" <contact@baal.fr> - 2016-01-11 01:10 +0100
    Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3438-1] xscreensaver security update Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org> - 2016-01-11 09:20 +0100
      Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3438-1] xscreensaver security update Povl Ole Haarlev Olsen <debian-security@stderr.dk> - 2016-01-11 10:30 +0100
        Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3438-1] xscreensaver security update Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 17:20 +0100
          Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3438-1] xscreensaver security update Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org> - 2016-01-11 18:20 +0100
            Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 3438-1] xscreensaver security update Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 14:30 +0100

csiph-web