Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.security > #5629
| From | Pieter le Roux <pgp@myleroux.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.security |
| Subject | Re: PGP/GnuPG unsecure, should be replaced? |
| Date | 2019-07-25 10:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ynGPn-53U-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ylzyF-7vw-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Good idea! Change something because it works! Any change we can make it part of systemd? My emoticon for being sarcastic: OO|OO On 19/07/19 11:34 PM, Stephan Seitz wrote: > Hi! > > I found the following article about PGP/GnuPG: > https://latacora.singles/2019/07/16/the-pgp-problem.html > > In short you should drop GnuPG because it doesn’t do anything really > the right way. It should be replaced with different tools for > different situations. > > Debian is using GnuPG for signing files. From the article: > > Signing Packages > > Use Signify/Minisign. Ted Unangst will tell you all about it. It’s what > OpenBSD uses to sign packages. It’s extremely simple and uses modern > signing. Minisign, from Frank Denis, the libsodium guy, brings the > same design to Windows and macOS; it has bindings for Go, Rust, > Python, Javascript, and .NET; it’s even compatible with Signify. > > What do you think? > > Shade and sweet water! > > Stephan >
Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
PGP/GnuPG unsecure, should be replaced? Stephan Seitz <stse+debian@fsing.rootsland.net> - 2019-07-19 13:50 +0200
Re: PGP/GnuPG unsecure, should be replaced? "qmi (list)" <lista@miklos.info> - 2019-07-20 21:40 +0200
Re: PGP/GnuPG unsecure, should be replaced? Iain Grant <iain@panfantastic.co.uk> - 2019-07-20 22:10 +0200
Re: PGP/GnuPG unsecure, should be replaced? Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@gmail.com> - 2019-07-21 21:20 +0200
Re: PGP/GnuPG unsecure, should be replaced? Iain Grant <iain@panfantastic.co.uk> - 2019-07-21 23:40 +0200
Re: PGP/GnuPG unsecure, should be replaced? Malte <malte@wk3.org> - 2019-07-21 16:50 +0200
Re: PGP/GnuPG unsecure, should be replaced? qmi <lista@miklos.info> - 2019-07-21 18:30 +0200
Re: PGP/GnuPG unsecure, should be replaced? Pieter le Roux <pgp@myleroux.net> - 2019-07-25 10:00 +0200
Re: PGP/GnuPG unsecure, should be replaced? Volker Birk <vb@pep-project.org> - 2019-07-25 15:30 +0200
csiph-web