Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8724 > unrolled thread

pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python

Contents

  pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-08-09 21:30 +0200
    Re: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt Daniel Stender <stender@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 00:00 +0200
      Re: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 00:10 +0200
      PAPT Git (was: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt) "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 01:00 +0200
        Re: PAPT Git (was: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt) Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 09:30 +0200
          Re: PAPT Git Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 09:40 +0200
          Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was:  PAPT Git) Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 10:20 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was:  PAPT Git) "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 11:00 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was: PAPT Git) Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 12:50 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT (was:  PAPT Git) Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 16:20 +0200
            Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org> - 2016-08-10 21:00 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 22:50 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2016-08-11 01:20 +0200
                  Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-11 15:30 +0200
                    Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2016-08-11 18:10 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2016-08-15 23:50 +0200
                  Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-16 00:00 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> - 2016-08-10 23:00 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2016-08-12 12:40 +0200
              Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@sergiodj.net> - 2016-08-13 00:00 +0200
                Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-08-13 00:40 +0200
                  Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@sergiodj.net> - 2016-08-16 22:40 +0200
                  Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)  <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2016-08-31 23:50 +0200
                    Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-09-02 21:20 +0200
    Re: pypi2deb 1.20160809 and --profile dpmt IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)  <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2016-08-31 23:50 +0200

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#8753 — Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Aug 12, 2016, at 05:50 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:

>I understand this is a matter of personal taste, but I beg to differ.  I
>have been using git-buildpackage for most of my non-Python packages and,
>despite really small nits here and there, I think it is an awesome tool.

I think there are multiple ways in which git-buildpackage is used.  E.g. I use
`gbp buildpackage` even for git-dpm maintained packages, to build the source
package, etc.  (It even has a nicer `clone` command that makes it easy to
actually get tracking branches; just wish it had something like
`pull-and-update-all-branches` since it's a bit of a PITA to update the
pristine-tar branch.)

It's just the few things that git-dpm adds on top of gbp that we're discussing
getting rid of, like importing a new upstream, managing the quilt patch set,
tagging.

Cheers,
-Barry

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#8776 — Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Friday, August 12 2016, Barry Warsaw wrote:

> On Aug 12, 2016, at 05:50 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>
>>I understand this is a matter of personal taste, but I beg to differ.  I
>>have been using git-buildpackage for most of my non-Python packages and,
>>despite really small nits here and there, I think it is an awesome tool.
>
> I think there are multiple ways in which git-buildpackage is used.  E.g. I use
> `gbp buildpackage` even for git-dpm maintained packages, to build the source
> package, etc.  (It even has a nicer `clone` command that makes it easy to
> actually get tracking branches; just wish it had something like
> `pull-and-update-all-branches` since it's a bit of a PITA to update the
> pristine-tar branch.)

Yeah, I use 'gbp dch' and 'gbp buildpackage' when dealing with git-dpm
packaging, too.

> It's just the few things that git-dpm adds on top of gbp that we're discussing
> getting rid of, like importing a new upstream, managing the quilt patch set,
> tagging.

Right, that's what I thought, and those things are exactly what make me
unhappy about using git-dpm :-).

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#8837 — Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 08/13/2016 12:39 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> just wish it had something like
> `pull-and-update-all-branches` since it's a bit of a PITA to update the
> pristine-tar branch.

isn't this what `gbp pull` is supposed to do?

gfdsar
IOhannes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#8840 — Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Aug 31, 2016, at 11:31 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:

>isn't this what `gbp pull` is supposed to do?

Indeed.  Either this is new-ish or I missed it, but it does exactly what I
want.  Thanks!

-Barry

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#8838

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 08/09/2016 09:27 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> 
> FYI: I just uploaded pypi2deb 1.20160809 which initializes all the git-dpm
> stuff if you invoke py2dsp with --profile dpmt option

OMG: i just discovered pypi2deb and its wonderful.
unfortunately i missed this mail when it was sent (or - more likely -
forgot about it), and while i was desparately looking really hard for
something that would take care of setting up git-dpm, i was unable to
find it.

pretty please, could you improve the (currently absymal¹) documentation?
pypi2deb deserves it

gfmdsar
IOhannes

¹ as in: no manpages, an empty /usr/share/doc (apart from the required
changelog&copyright) and a very cryptic "--help"

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python

csiph-web