Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!news.unit0.net!news.panservice.it!diesel.cu.mi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Barry Warsaw Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: using git-dpm or plain git-buildpackage in PAPT and DPMT Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 00:40:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Aug 12 22:39:27 2016 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.88 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5 Organization: The Organization of Unorganized Woozalists X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/EWVoA6imlwu1F1RijBJZ3dv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/14094 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20160812183909.392e6987@subdivisions.wooz.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 49 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 18:39:09 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <20160812183909.392e6987@subdivisions.wooz.org> X-Original-References: <20160809192733.pfsnzejxlmd3knbe@p1otr.com> <356e3407-7970-5c4f-f963-60664898548a@debian.org> <20160809225020.GA30494@fama> <87fuqccv6p.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <87a8gh64j0.fsf@sergiodj.net> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:8753 --Sig_/EWVoA6imlwu1F1RijBJZ3dv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Aug 12, 2016, at 05:50 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >I understand this is a matter of personal taste, but I beg to differ. I >have been using git-buildpackage for most of my non-Python packages and, >despite really small nits here and there, I think it is an awesome tool. I think there are multiple ways in which git-buildpackage is used. E.g. I = use `gbp buildpackage` even for git-dpm maintained packages, to build the source package, etc. (It even has a nicer `clone` command that makes it easy to actually get tracking branches; just wish it had something like `pull-and-update-all-branches` since it's a bit of a PITA to update the pristine-tar branch.) It's just the few things that git-dpm adds on top of gbp that we're discuss= ing getting rid of, like importing a new upstream, managing the quilt patch set, tagging. Cheers, -Barry --Sig_/EWVoA6imlwu1F1RijBJZ3dv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXrlANAAoJEBJutWOnSwa/xbQQAKxIuT9wWlLr/HmwpjAEJYum JlTaxUmwIExOCJQWt0odTbDC1PeW38NhAUJkKRUI1XR91kGjBfhd2Z8X8mvj/Lsr QEpvhBiGlwlKXWMyo/hzd7gVEAyrapJNDOBnu/EQYxvnOoc38ITdV9nFokW2Uu7g mPMLkTrKM6oYaB1tOpgWQY8JMX7NJDi9XlKezqLmqAtMh/daEgELz7w8YINzQgD0 SSKrX7mUfG1WdDEwGQL4zwHCqQ9aL1/zXaaAALCmxZ6KsYLW3OfPd7RSDpl0uiJi P6Xli1kR8Q1BQUSL96irp+kBv5ZMB0l2T/z1/+OEg6d/ggtMgKYjT5hmVxjyhoiY Oc9FFK4zdvAWumX9u8s6clwju1LtrF8A5n2fFGMOSJej60NTBrkWd4aIBqNAJ5pc cr+z7QwKf67IAwXHqP3TZKJJJRAFmoTRCrTAdkDYOTKzg6EPMrMzqpQRqb8ce/nq nVc1uYUcrRbNs8NbIJb3sCb56xJXKmhSwc/2lHELlse6vCOYlzWjn066Xwc5ei2M 748jT6f5qVWIp6O9f7p8w1S2Iqx0dl/nJAmLBYXLrFXbHHmATts5gtEqbE3DKR1l KtoVMHwOwJ2ukGWZb1L5ZoGgon10EACWrcWyM+uwqwjvZXvysDuZ41CuFljT14ks mUxnu64uTd1dyjpRlLRT =9k9k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/EWVoA6imlwu1F1RijBJZ3dv--