Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14442 > unrolled thread

RFS: mercurial-evolve

Started byGeorges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr>
First post2022-09-06 14:50 +0200
Last post2023-02-06 12:10 +0100
Articles 10 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python


Contents

  RFS: mercurial-evolve Georges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr> - 2022-09-06 14:50 +0200
    Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve "Andrej Shadura" <andrewsh@debian.org> - 2022-09-06 15:40 +0200
      Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve "Andrej Shadura" <andrewsh@debian.org> - 2022-09-07 09:40 +0200
        Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> - 2022-09-07 11:50 +0200
          Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve Georges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr> - 2022-09-07 18:50 +0200
        Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve Georges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr> - 2022-09-07 18:30 +0200
        Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve Georges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr> - 2023-01-16 23:50 +0100
          Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve "Andrej Shadura" <andrewsh@debian.org> - 2023-02-06 10:50 +0100
            Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve Georges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr> - 2023-02-06 12:10 +0100
            Re: RFS: mercurial-evolve Georges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr> - 2023-02-06 12:10 +0100

#14442 — RFS: mercurial-evolve

FromGeorges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr>
Date2022-09-06 14:50 +0200
SubjectRFS: mercurial-evolve
Message-ID<F2GbE-5Hg4-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Dear Python Maintainers,

I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "mercurial-evolve".

The salsa project is 
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/mercurial-evolve/

My own ITP is https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008744 
(don't hesitate to tell if I should file an RFS in the bugs.debian.org 
as well)

(Cc-ing DDs I've spoken about it in the past)

Many thanks!


-- 
Georges Racinet
https://octobus.net, https://heptapod.net
GPG: BF5456F4DC625443849B6E58EE20CA44EF691D39, sur serveurs publics

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#14443

From"Andrej Shadura" <andrewsh@debian.org>
Date2022-09-06 15:40 +0200
Message-ID<F2GY1-5HKU-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#14442
Hi Georges,

On Tue, 6 Sep 2022, at 14:45, Georges Racinet wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "mercurial-evolve".

> (Cc-ing DDs I've spoken about it in the past)

Cool. I'm a little bit busy right now packing for the trip, but I will have a look at it a bit later this afternoon.

-- 
Cheers,
  Andrej

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#14446

From"Andrej Shadura" <andrewsh@debian.org>
Date2022-09-07 09:40 +0200
Message-ID<F2XPb-5RU0-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#14443
Hi,

On Tue, 6 Sep 2022, at 14:53, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2022, at 14:45, Georges Racinet wrote:
>> I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "mercurial-evolve".
>
>> (Cc-ing DDs I've spoken about it in the past)

> Cool. I'm a little bit busy right now packing for the trip, but I will 
> have a look at it a bit later this afternoon.

I’ve made some changes and uploaded evolve to NEW.
In one commit I made a "typo" and wrote a wrong word: "Drop unnecessary variable names". What I meant was, of course, "variables" :)
Anyway, DH_VERBOSE=1 is better set by the maintainer rather than directly in debian/rules, as it’s a bit too verbose, and this package is not too tricky to require it at all times. I can’t remember right now how exactly PYBUILD_NAME works, but I don’t think you were using it correctly here, and it didn’t make any visible difference anyway (likely because there’s only one binary package), so I dropped it.

Other than that, the rest of the commits are minor nitpicks and are, hopefully, self-descriptive.

Thanks, you did a good job on your first Debian package :)

-- 
Cheers,
  Andrej

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#14447

FromNicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr>
Date2022-09-07 11:50 +0200
Message-ID<F2ZQZ-5T40-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#14446
Hi List,

Le Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 09:12:05AM +0200, Andrej Shadura a écrit :
> Thanks, you did a good job on your first Debian package :)

Nice to this the progress made for this package. I look forward to using it !

-- 
Nicolas Chauvat

logilab.fr - services en informatique scientifique et gestion de connaissances  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#14449

FromGeorges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr>
Date2022-09-07 18:50 +0200
Message-ID<F36pr-5WUy-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#14447

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 07/09/2022 11:41, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Le Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 09:12:05AM +0200, Andrej Shadura a écrit :
>> Thanks, you did a good job on your first Debian package :)
> Nice to this the progress made for this package. I look forward to using it !
>
Well, thank you and Logilab for supporting the effort!

-- 
Georges Racinet
https://octobus.net, https://heptapod.net
GPG: BF5456F4DC625443849B6E58EE20CA44EF691D39, sur serveurs publics

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#14448

FromGeorges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr>
Date2022-09-07 18:30 +0200
Message-ID<F3665-5WOk-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#14446

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 07/09/2022 09:12, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2022, at 14:53, Andrej Shadura wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Sep 2022, at 14:45, Georges Racinet wrote:
>>> I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "mercurial-evolve".
> I’ve made some changes and uploaded evolve to NEW.
> In one commit I made a "typo" and wrote a wrong word: "Drop unnecessary variable names". What I meant was, of course, "variables" :)
> Anyway, DH_VERBOSE=1 is better set by the maintainer rather than directly in debian/rules, as it’s a bit too verbose, and this package is not too tricky to require it at all times. I can’t remember right now how exactly PYBUILD_NAME works, but I don’t think you were using it correctly here, and it didn’t make any visible difference anyway (likely because there’s only one binary package), so I dropped it.
I'll look into it.
>
> Other than that, the rest of the commits are minor nitpicks and are, hopefully, self-descriptive.
Thank you for the fixes / improvements, and for the upload, this is great!
> Thanks, you did a good job on your first Debian package :)
>
:-) I still have some rookie questions, don't worry :-)

-- 
Georges Racinet
https://octobus.net, https://heptapod.net
GPG: BF5456F4DC625443849B6E58EE20CA44EF691D39, sur serveurs publics

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#14829

FromGeorges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr>
Date2023-01-16 23:50 +0100
Message-ID<FOGsF-Uy9-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#14446

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi, I just made a new version of the mercurial-evolve package, following 
the new upstream 10.5.3. It's still at 
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/mercurial-evolve.

Andrej, would you be so kind to take a look at it, I hope the package 
can make it before the freeze.

On the technical side, this new upsteam version provides compatibility 
with Mercurial 6.3 (which I see has come up since last attempt) and 
Python 3.11, according to the changelog, I didn't follow details myself.

I believe I had formerly addressed the ftpmaster reservations about the 
copyright statements, but feel free to tell me if there is something 
else to be done.

Best,

On 9/7/22 09:12, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2022, at 14:53, Andrej Shadura wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Sep 2022, at 14:45, Georges Racinet wrote:
>>> I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "mercurial-evolve".
>>> (Cc-ing DDs I've spoken about it in the past)
>> Cool. I'm a little bit busy right now packing for the trip, but I will
>> have a look at it a bit later this afternoon.
> I’ve made some changes and uploaded evolve to NEW.
> In one commit I made a "typo" and wrote a wrong word: "Drop unnecessary variable names". What I meant was, of course, "variables" :)
> Anyway, DH_VERBOSE=1 is better set by the maintainer rather than directly in debian/rules, as it’s a bit too verbose, and this package is not too tricky to require it at all times. I can’t remember right now how exactly PYBUILD_NAME works, but I don’t think you were using it correctly here, and it didn’t make any visible difference anyway (likely because there’s only one binary package), so I dropped it.
>
> Other than that, the rest of the commits are minor nitpicks and are, hopefully, self-descriptive.
>
> Thanks, you did a good job on your first Debian package :)
>

-- 
Georges Racinet
https://octobus.net, https://about.heptapod.host, https://heptapod.net
GPG: BF5456F4DC625443849B6E58EE20CA44EF691D39, sur serveurs publics

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#14899

From"Andrej Shadura" <andrewsh@debian.org>
Date2023-02-06 10:50 +0100
Message-ID<FW6im-3SNX-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#14829
Hi,

On Mon, 6 Feb 2023, at 10:05, Georges Racinet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 1/16/23 23:44, Georges Racinet wrote:
>> Hi, I just made a new version of the mercurial-evolve package, 
>> following the new upstream 10.5.3. It's still at 
>> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/mercurial-evolve.
>>
>> Andrej, would you be so kind to take a look at it, I hope the package 
>> can make it before the freeze.
>
> Is there something I should do to help make this happen? If I read it 
> right, soft freeze is on 2023-03-12
>
> Andrej, Julien maybe ?

Did you get the rejection email?
Apparently a few more copyright entries are missing.

-- 
Andrej

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#14900

FromGeorges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr>
Date2023-02-06 12:10 +0100
Message-ID<FW7xL-3TLE-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#14899

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 2/6/23 12:07, Georges Racinet wrote:
> On 2/6/23 10:26, Andrej Shadura wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, 6 Feb 2023, at 10:05, Georges Racinet wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 1/16/23 23:44, Georges Racinet wrote:
>>>> Hi, I just made a new version of the mercurial-evolve package,
>>>> following the new upstream 10.5.3. It's still at
>>>> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/mercurial-evolve.
>>>>
>>>> Andrej, would you be so kind to take a look at it, I hope the package
>>>> can make it before the freeze.
>>> Is there something I should do to help make this happen? If I read it
>>> right, soft freeze is on 2023-03-12
>>>
>>> Andrej, Julien maybe ?
>> Did you get the rejection email?
>> Apparently a few more copyright entries are missing.
>>
> No, sorry I haven't noticed. Just to be sure, you're talking of one 
> for 10.5.3 ?
>
Got it now, sorry. I'm on it, will push again today

-- 
Georges Racinet
https://octobus.net, https://about.heptapod.host, https://heptapod.net
GPG: BF5456F4DC625443849B6E58EE20CA44EF691D39, sur serveurs publics

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#14901

FromGeorges Racinet <georges@racinet.fr>
Date2023-02-06 12:10 +0100
Message-ID<FW7xL-3TLE-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#14899

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 2/6/23 10:26, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2023, at 10:05, Georges Racinet wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 1/16/23 23:44, Georges Racinet wrote:
>>> Hi, I just made a new version of the mercurial-evolve package,
>>> following the new upstream 10.5.3. It's still at
>>> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/mercurial-evolve.
>>>
>>> Andrej, would you be so kind to take a look at it, I hope the package
>>> can make it before the freeze.
>> Is there something I should do to help make this happen? If I read it
>> right, soft freeze is on 2023-03-12
>>
>> Andrej, Julien maybe ?
> Did you get the rejection email?
> Apparently a few more copyright entries are missing.
>
No, sorry I haven't noticed. Just to be sure, you're talking of one for 
10.5.3 ?

-- 
Georges Racinet
https://octobus.net, https://about.heptapod.host, https://heptapod.net
GPG: BF5456F4DC625443849B6E58EE20CA44EF691D39, sur serveurs publics

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python


csiph-web